Exploring the concept of unmet need within sexual and reproductive health in England: A qualitative Delphi exercise

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100969
Danielle Solomon , Jo Gibbs , Fiona Burns , Caroline A Sabin
{"title":"Exploring the concept of unmet need within sexual and reproductive health in England: A qualitative Delphi exercise","authors":"Danielle Solomon ,&nbsp;Jo Gibbs ,&nbsp;Fiona Burns ,&nbsp;Caroline A Sabin","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unmet need within sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is a concept that is difficult to define and measure. This qualitative Delphi exercise was used to ascertain the opinions of SRH professionals on the conceptualisation and measurement of unmet need within SRH.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This exercise was carried out in two rounds. In the first round, respondents responded narratively to three prompts, which were then used to create a series of statements. In the second round, participants responded narratively to the statements created in the first round. Responses from both rounds were then coded and analysed thematically.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants felt that an understanding of unmet need is an important part of SRH service design and provision, and believed that certain populations are often underrepresented within the datasets that are used to assess unmet need. Many respondents felt that a full understanding of unmet need within SRH would only come from involvement of relevant stakeholders in the process of investigating unmet need, and that qualitative methods may also have a role to play in gaining a more holistic understanding of unmet need within SRH.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Respondents within this study felt that unmet need is complex concept that has a significant impact on service delivery and the outcomes and experiences of the most vulnerable populations. We need to improve our understanding of unmet need and prioritise stakeholder voices if we want to create interventions that address unmet need within SRH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100969"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000247/pdfft?md5=4c9c1463e48c86b3f129900d8b8cd041&pid=1-s2.0-S1877575624000247-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unmet need within sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is a concept that is difficult to define and measure. This qualitative Delphi exercise was used to ascertain the opinions of SRH professionals on the conceptualisation and measurement of unmet need within SRH.

Methods

This exercise was carried out in two rounds. In the first round, respondents responded narratively to three prompts, which were then used to create a series of statements. In the second round, participants responded narratively to the statements created in the first round. Responses from both rounds were then coded and analysed thematically.

Results

Participants felt that an understanding of unmet need is an important part of SRH service design and provision, and believed that certain populations are often underrepresented within the datasets that are used to assess unmet need. Many respondents felt that a full understanding of unmet need within SRH would only come from involvement of relevant stakeholders in the process of investigating unmet need, and that qualitative methods may also have a role to play in gaining a more holistic understanding of unmet need within SRH.

Conclusions

Respondents within this study felt that unmet need is complex concept that has a significant impact on service delivery and the outcomes and experiences of the most vulnerable populations. We need to improve our understanding of unmet need and prioritise stakeholder voices if we want to create interventions that address unmet need within SRH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索英格兰性健康和生殖健康领域未满足需求的概念:德尔菲定性研究
背景性健康和生殖健康(SRH)中未满足的需求是一个难以界定和衡量的概念。本德尔菲定性研究旨在了解性健康和生殖健康专业人员对性健康和生殖健康领域未满足需求的概念化和测量方法的看法。在第一轮中,受访者对三条提示做出叙述性回答,然后根据这些回答形成一系列陈述。在第二轮中,参与者对第一轮中创建的陈述进行叙述式回答。结果参与者认为,了解未满足的需求是设计和提供性健康和生殖健康服务的重要部分,并认为某些人群在用于评估未满足需求的数据集中的代表性往往不足。许多受访者认为,只有让相关利益方参与到未满足需求的调查过程中,才能全面了解性健康和生殖健康领域未满足的需求,定性方法也可以在更全面地了解性健康和生殖健康领域未满足的需求方面发挥作用。如果我们想要制定干预措施来解决性健康和生殖健康方面未得到满足的需求,我们就需要加深对未满足需求的理解,并优先考虑利益相关者的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
The road to equity: A scoping review of the evidence and practices on abortion policies and services in Sweden Women experiencing the second stage of labour for the first time: A qualitative free-text analysis within the Oneplus trial Comparing perceived heating effect and intensity of therapeutic ultrasound between breast tissue and calf muscle in lactating women: An observational study Women’s experiences of participating in a digital continuity of care model designed for fear of birth in a rural setting Perceptions of the Black population on fertility care: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1