Interhospital variability in cardiac rehabilitation use after cardiac surgery among Medicare beneficiaries

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.019
Maximilian A. Fliegner BA , Hechuan Hou MS , Tyler M. Bauer MD , Temilolaoluwa Daramola MD , Jeffrey S. McCullough PhD , Francis D. Pagani MD, PhD , Devraj Sukul MD, MSc , Donald S. Likosky PhD , Steven J. Keteyian PhD , Michael P. Thompson PhD
{"title":"Interhospital variability in cardiac rehabilitation use after cardiac surgery among Medicare beneficiaries","authors":"Maximilian A. Fliegner BA ,&nbsp;Hechuan Hou MS ,&nbsp;Tyler M. Bauer MD ,&nbsp;Temilolaoluwa Daramola MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. McCullough PhD ,&nbsp;Francis D. Pagani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Devraj Sukul MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Donald S. Likosky PhD ,&nbsp;Steven J. Keteyian PhD ,&nbsp;Michael P. Thompson PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Despite guideline recommendation, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after cardiac surgery remains underused, and the extent of interhospital variability is not well understood. This study evaluated determinants of interhospital variability in CR use and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included 166,809 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing cardiac surgery who were discharged alive between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. CR participation was identified in outpatient facility claims within a year of discharge. Hospital-level CR rates were tabulated, and multilevel models evaluated the extent to which patient, organizational, and regional factors accounted for interhospital variability. Adjusted 1-year mortality and readmission rates were also calculated for each hospital quartile of CR use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Overall, 90,171 (54.1%) participated in at least 1 CR session within a year of discharge. Interhospital CR rates ranged from 0.0% to 96.8%. Hospital factors that predicted CR use included nonteaching status and lower-hospital volume. Before adjustment for patient, organizational, and regional factors, 19.3% of interhospital variability was attributable to the admitting hospital. After accounting for covariates, 12.3% of variation was attributable to the admitting hospital. Patient (0.5%), structural (2.8%), and regional (3.7%) factors accounted for the remaining explained variation. Hospitals in the lowest quartile of CR use had greater adjusted 1-year mortality rates (Q1 = 6.7%, Q4 = 5.2%, </span><em>P</em> &lt; .001) and readmission rates (Q1 = 37.6%, Q4 = 33.9%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Identifying best practices among high CR use facilities and barriers to access in low CR use hospitals may reduce interhospital variability in CR use and advance national improvement efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"169 3","pages":"Pages 916-923.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522324003635","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Despite guideline recommendation, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after cardiac surgery remains underused, and the extent of interhospital variability is not well understood. This study evaluated determinants of interhospital variability in CR use and outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 166,809 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing cardiac surgery who were discharged alive between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. CR participation was identified in outpatient facility claims within a year of discharge. Hospital-level CR rates were tabulated, and multilevel models evaluated the extent to which patient, organizational, and regional factors accounted for interhospital variability. Adjusted 1-year mortality and readmission rates were also calculated for each hospital quartile of CR use.

Results

Overall, 90,171 (54.1%) participated in at least 1 CR session within a year of discharge. Interhospital CR rates ranged from 0.0% to 96.8%. Hospital factors that predicted CR use included nonteaching status and lower-hospital volume. Before adjustment for patient, organizational, and regional factors, 19.3% of interhospital variability was attributable to the admitting hospital. After accounting for covariates, 12.3% of variation was attributable to the admitting hospital. Patient (0.5%), structural (2.8%), and regional (3.7%) factors accounted for the remaining explained variation. Hospitals in the lowest quartile of CR use had greater adjusted 1-year mortality rates (Q1 = 6.7%, Q4 = 5.2%, P < .001) and readmission rates (Q1 = 37.6%, Q4 = 33.9%, P < .001).

Conclusions

Identifying best practices among high CR use facilities and barriers to access in low CR use hospitals may reduce interhospital variability in CR use and advance national improvement efforts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险受益人心脏手术后使用心脏康复治疗的医院间差异。
目的尽管有指南推荐,但心脏手术后的心脏康复(CR)仍未得到充分利用,医院间差异的程度尚不清楚。本研究评估了医院间CR使用和预后变异性的决定因素。方法本回顾性队列研究纳入2016年7月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受心脏手术的166,809名医疗保险受益人。在出院一年内门诊设施索赔中确定了CR参与。将医院水平的CR率制成表格,并采用多水平模型评估患者、组织和地区因素对医院间变异性的影响程度。调整后的1年死亡率和再入院率也计算了每个使用CR的医院四分位数。结果90171例(54.1%)患者在出院一年内至少参加了1次CR治疗。医院间CR率从0.0%到96.8%不等。预测CR使用的医院因素包括非教学状态和较低的医院容量。在调整患者、组织和地区因素之前,19.3%的医院间变异可归因于入院医院。在考虑协变量后,12.3%的变异可归因于入院医院。患者(0.5%)、结构(2.8%)和区域(3.7%)因素解释了其余的变异。CR使用最低四分位数的医院调整后1年死亡率更高(Q1 = 6.7%, Q4 = 5.2%, P <;措施)和重新接纳率(Q1 = 37.6%,第四季度= 33.9%,P & lt;措施)。结论:确定高CR使用设施的最佳实践和低CR使用医院的准入障碍可以减少CR使用的医院间差异,并推进国家改进工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Interpretable artificial intelligence to predict preoperative risk factors for failure to rescue after coronary artery bypass grafting Outcomes among patients bridged to heart transplant with microaxial flow versus durable left ventricular assist device support Early promise, enduring questions: Endovascular repair for type A aortic dissection continues to seek stronger evidence Stroke after aortic arch surgery with short circulatory arrest times: The role of cerebral perfusion strategies Safety risks of intratracheal lipid nanoparticle gene delivery to the lung and potential mitigation strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1