Contact patterns between index patients and their close contacts and assessing risk for COVID-19 transmission during different exposure time windows: a large retrospective observational study of 450 770 close contacts in Shanghai

Abstract

To characterise age-mixing patterns among index cases and contacts of COVID-19, and explore when patients are most infectious during the disease process.This study examined all initial 90 885 confirmed index cases in Shanghai and their 450 770 close contacts. A generalised additive mixed model was used to analyse the associations of the number of close contacts with different demographic and clinical characteristics. The effect of different exposure time windows on the infection of close contacts was evaluated using a modified mixed-effects Poisson regression.Analysis of contacts indicated that 82 467 (18.29%; 95% CI 18.17%, 18.42%) were second-generation cases. Our result indicated the q-index was 0.300 (95% CI 0.298, 0.302) for overall contact matrix, and that assortativity was greatest for students (q-index=0.377; 95% CI 0.357, 0.396) and weakest for people working age not in the labour force (q-index=0.246; 95% CI 0.240, 0.252). The number of contacts was 4.96 individuals per index case (95% CI 4.86, 5.06). Contacts had a higher risk if they were exposed from 1 day before to 3 days after the onset of symptoms in the index patient, with a maximum at day 0 (adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.52; 95% CI 1.30, 1.76). Contacts exposed from 3 days before to 3 days after an asymptomatic index case had a positive reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) result had a higher risk, with a maximum on day 0 (aRR=1.48; 95% CI 1.37, 1.59).The greatest assortativity was for students and weakest for people working age not in the labour force. Contact in the household was a significant contributor to the infection of close contacts. Contact tracing should focus on individuals who had contact soon before or soon after the onset of symptoms (or positive RT-PCR test) in the index case.