466 Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Symptomatic VTE at Time of Admission and Time of Discharge after Severe Traumatic Injury

Sergio M Navarro, Riley Thompson, Taleen A. MacArthur, Grant M Spears, Kent Bailey, Joe Immermann, Matthew T Auton, Jing-Fei Dong, Rosemary A Kozar, Myung S Park
{"title":"466 Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Symptomatic VTE at Time of Admission and Time of Discharge after Severe Traumatic Injury","authors":"Sergio M Navarro, Riley Thompson, Taleen A. MacArthur, Grant M Spears, Kent Bailey, Joe Immermann, Matthew T Auton, Jing-Fei Dong, Rosemary A Kozar, Myung S Park","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical indicators predictive of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients at multiple time points are not well outlined, particularly at time of discharge. We aimed to describe and predict inpatient and post-discharge risk factors of VTE after trauma using a multi-variate regression model and best of class machine learning (ML) models. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In a prospective, case-cohort study, all trauma patients (pts) who arrived as level 1 or 2 trauma activations, from June 2018 to February 2020 were considered for study inclusion. A subset of pts who developed incident, first time, VTE and those who did not develop VTE within 90 days of discharge were identified. VTE were confirmed either by imaging or at autopsy during inpatient stay or post-discharge. Outcomes were defined as the development of symptomatic VTE (DVT and/or PE) within 90 days of discharge.A multi-variate Cox regression model and a best in class of a set of 5 different ML models (support-vector machine, random-forest, naives Bayes, logistic regression, neural network]) were used to predict VTE using models applied a) at 24 hours of injury date or b) on day of patient discharge. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among 393 trauma pts (ISS=12.0, hospital LOS=4.0 days, age=48 years, 71% male, 96% with blunt mechanism, mortality 2.8%), 36 developed inpatient VTE and 36 developed VTE after discharge. In a weighted, multivariate Cox model, any type of surgery by day 1, increased age per 10 years, and BMI per 5 points were predictors of overall symptomatic VTE (C-stat 0.738). Prophylactic IVC filter placement (4.40), increased patient age per 10 years, and BMI per 5 points were predictors of post-discharge symptomatic VTE (C-stat= 0.698). A neural network ML model predicted VTE by day 1 with accuracy and AUC of 0.82 and 0.76, with performance exceeding those of a Cox model. A naīve Bayesian ML model predicted VTE at discharge, with accuracy and AUC of 0.81 and 0.77 at time of discharge, with performance exceeding those of a Cox model. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The rate of inpatient and post-discharge VTEs remain high. Limitations: single institution study, limited number of patients, internal validation only, with the use of limited number of ML models. We developed and internally validated a ML based tool.Future work will focus on external validation and expansion of ML techniques.","PeriodicalId":508693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"92 12","pages":"136 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical indicators predictive of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients at multiple time points are not well outlined, particularly at time of discharge. We aimed to describe and predict inpatient and post-discharge risk factors of VTE after trauma using a multi-variate regression model and best of class machine learning (ML) models. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In a prospective, case-cohort study, all trauma patients (pts) who arrived as level 1 or 2 trauma activations, from June 2018 to February 2020 were considered for study inclusion. A subset of pts who developed incident, first time, VTE and those who did not develop VTE within 90 days of discharge were identified. VTE were confirmed either by imaging or at autopsy during inpatient stay or post-discharge. Outcomes were defined as the development of symptomatic VTE (DVT and/or PE) within 90 days of discharge.A multi-variate Cox regression model and a best in class of a set of 5 different ML models (support-vector machine, random-forest, naives Bayes, logistic regression, neural network]) were used to predict VTE using models applied a) at 24 hours of injury date or b) on day of patient discharge. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among 393 trauma pts (ISS=12.0, hospital LOS=4.0 days, age=48 years, 71% male, 96% with blunt mechanism, mortality 2.8%), 36 developed inpatient VTE and 36 developed VTE after discharge. In a weighted, multivariate Cox model, any type of surgery by day 1, increased age per 10 years, and BMI per 5 points were predictors of overall symptomatic VTE (C-stat 0.738). Prophylactic IVC filter placement (4.40), increased patient age per 10 years, and BMI per 5 points were predictors of post-discharge symptomatic VTE (C-stat= 0.698). A neural network ML model predicted VTE by day 1 with accuracy and AUC of 0.82 and 0.76, with performance exceeding those of a Cox model. A naīve Bayesian ML model predicted VTE at discharge, with accuracy and AUC of 0.81 and 0.77 at time of discharge, with performance exceeding those of a Cox model. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The rate of inpatient and post-discharge VTEs remain high. Limitations: single institution study, limited number of patients, internal validation only, with the use of limited number of ML models. We developed and internally validated a ML based tool.Future work will focus on external validation and expansion of ML techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
466 开发机器学习算法,预测严重创伤后入院时和出院时的无症状 VTE
目的/目标:在多个时间点预测创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的临床指标尚未得到很好的概述,尤其是在出院时。我们旨在使用多变量回归模型和最佳机器学习(ML)模型来描述和预测创伤后 VTE 的住院和出院后风险因素。方法/研究对象:在一项前瞻性病例队列研究中,所有在 2018 年 6 月至 2020 年 2 月期间以 1 级或 2 级创伤激活身份到达医院的创伤患者(pts)均被纳入研究对象。研究人员确定了首次发生 VTE 的患者子集,以及出院后 90 天内未发生 VTE 的患者子集。VTE在住院期间或出院后通过影像学检查或尸检得到确认。多变量 Cox 回归模型和 5 种不同 ML 模型(支持向量机、随机森林、天真贝叶斯、逻辑回归、神经网络)中的同类最佳模型用于预测 VTE,模型应用于 a) 受伤后 24 小时内或 b) 患者出院当天。结果/推断结果:在 393 名外伤患者(ISS=12.0,住院时间=4.0 天,年龄=48 岁,71% 为男性,96% 为钝器伤,死亡率为 2.8%)中,36 人在住院时发生 VTE,36 人在出院后发生 VTE。在加权多变量 Cox 模型中,第 1 天之前接受过任何类型的手术、年龄每增加 10 岁和体重指数每增加 5 点均可预测总体症状性 VTE(C-stat 0.738)。预防性 IVC 过滤器置入 (4.40)、患者年龄每 10 年增加一次以及体重指数每 5 点增加一次是出院后症状性 VTE 的预测因素(C-stat= 0.698)。神经网络 ML 模型预测 VTE 第 1 天的准确率和 AUC 分别为 0.82 和 0.76,其性能超过了 Cox 模型。天真贝叶斯 ML 模型可预测出院时的 VTE,准确率和 AUC 分别为 0.81 和 0.77,其性能超过了 Cox 模型。讨论/意义:住院和出院后的 VTE 发生率仍然很高。局限性:单机构研究,患者数量有限,仅进行内部验证,使用的 ML 模型数量有限。我们开发并在内部验证了一种基于 ML 的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in self-confidence in professional, personal and scientific skills by gender during physician scientist training at the University of Pittsburgh Developing a Bayesian Workshop for Full-time Staff Statisticians Inpatient Screening for Social Determinants of Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative The Epidemiology of Errors in Data Capture, Management, and Analysis: A Scoping Review of Retracted Articles and Retraction Notices in Clinical and Translational Research Interactive Visualization Tool to Understand and Monitor Health Disparities in Diabetes Care and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1