Experience with the utilization of new-generation shared-control robotic system for spinal instrumentation.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06206-4
Ghani Haider, Vaibhavi Shah, Ivan Lopez, Katherine E Wagner, Martin N. Stienen, Anand Veeravagu
{"title":"Experience with the utilization of new-generation shared-control robotic system for spinal instrumentation.","authors":"Ghani Haider, Vaibhavi Shah, Ivan Lopez, Katherine E Wagner, Martin N. Stienen, Anand Veeravagu","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06206-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nRobotic assistance in spine surgery is emerging as an accurate, effective and enabling technology utilized in the treatment of patients with surgical spinal pathology. The safety and reproducibility of robotic assistance in the placement of pedicle screw instrumentation is still being investigated. The objective of this study was to present our experience of instrumented spinal fusion utilizing an intraoperative robotic guidance system.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe retrospectively reviewed all cases of spinal instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbo-sacral spine using the Mazor X robotic system (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA), performed at our institution by one surgeon between July 2017 and June 2020. Wilcoxon Rank test was used to compare time taken to place each screw during the first 20 cases and the cases thereafter.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 28 patients were included. A total of 159 screws were placed using the Mazor X robotic system. The overall mean time for screw placement was 7.8±2.3 minutes and there was a significant reduction in the mean time for screw placement after the 20th case or 120 screws (8.70 vs. 5.42 min, P=0.008). No postoperative neurologic deficit or new radiculopathy was noted to occur secondary to hardware placement. No revision surgery was required for replacement or removal of a mispositioned screw.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFrom this single-center, single-surgeon series we conclude that robot-assisted spine surgery can be safely and efficiently integrated into the operating room workflow, which improves after a learning curve of approximately 20 operative interventions. We found robot-assisted spinal instrumentation to be reliable, safe, effective and highly precise.","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06206-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Robotic assistance in spine surgery is emerging as an accurate, effective and enabling technology utilized in the treatment of patients with surgical spinal pathology. The safety and reproducibility of robotic assistance in the placement of pedicle screw instrumentation is still being investigated. The objective of this study was to present our experience of instrumented spinal fusion utilizing an intraoperative robotic guidance system. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all cases of spinal instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbo-sacral spine using the Mazor X robotic system (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA), performed at our institution by one surgeon between July 2017 and June 2020. Wilcoxon Rank test was used to compare time taken to place each screw during the first 20 cases and the cases thereafter. RESULTS A total of 28 patients were included. A total of 159 screws were placed using the Mazor X robotic system. The overall mean time for screw placement was 7.8±2.3 minutes and there was a significant reduction in the mean time for screw placement after the 20th case or 120 screws (8.70 vs. 5.42 min, P=0.008). No postoperative neurologic deficit or new radiculopathy was noted to occur secondary to hardware placement. No revision surgery was required for replacement or removal of a mispositioned screw. CONCLUSIONS From this single-center, single-surgeon series we conclude that robot-assisted spine surgery can be safely and efficiently integrated into the operating room workflow, which improves after a learning curve of approximately 20 operative interventions. We found robot-assisted spinal instrumentation to be reliable, safe, effective and highly precise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新一代共享控制机器人系统进行脊柱器械手术的经验。
背景脊柱手术中的机器人辅助技术正逐渐成为治疗脊柱病变患者的一种准确、有效的辅助技术。机器人辅助放置椎弓根螺钉器械的安全性和可重复性仍在研究之中。本研究的目的是介绍我们利用术中机器人引导系统进行器械脊柱融合术的经验。方法我们回顾性地回顾了2017年7月至2020年6月期间本院一名外科医生使用Mazor X机器人系统(美敦力公司,美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市)进行胸椎和骶骨脊柱器械置入术的所有病例。采用Wilcoxon秩检验比较前20个病例和之后病例放置每颗螺钉所需的时间。共使用 Mazor X 机器人系统置入 159 颗螺钉。放置螺钉的总平均时间为(7.8±2.3)分钟,在第20例或120枚螺钉后,放置螺钉的平均时间显著缩短(8.70对5.42分钟,P=0.008)。没有发现术后神经功能缺损或新的神经根病继发于硬件置入。结论通过这个单中心、单外科医生的系列研究,我们得出结论:机器人辅助脊柱手术可以安全、高效地融入手术室工作流程,在经过约20次手术干预的学习曲线后,手术效果会有所改善。我们发现机器人辅助脊柱器械是可靠、安全、有效和高度精确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Roxadustat protects oxidative stress and tissue injury in the brain induced by ischemic stroke via the HIF-1α/NRF2 axis. Follow-up neuroimaging after non-perimesencephalic, angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: surgical outcomes in 65 patients, review of the literature and proposal for an anatomical and radiological classification. Association of baseline frailty and age with postoperative outcomes in metastatic brain tumor patients. VEGF gene polymorphisms in Iranian patients with intracranial glioblastoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1