The Long COVID Symptoms and Severity Score: Development, Validation, and Application

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.009
{"title":"The Long COVID Symptoms and Severity Score: Development, Validation, and Application","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary focus of this research is the proposition of a methodological framework for the clinical application of the long COVID symptoms and severity score (LC-SSS). This tool is not just a self-reported assessment instrument developed and validated but serves as a standardized, quantifiable means to monitor the diverse and persistent symptoms frequently observed in individuals with long COVID.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 3-stage process was used to develop, validate, and establish scoring standards for the LC-SSS. Validation measures included correlations with other patient-reported measures, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s α for internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Scoring standards were determined using K-means clustering, with comparative assessments made against hierarchical clustering and the Gaussian Mixture Model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The LC-SSS showed correlations with EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.55), EuroQol visual analog scale (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.368), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.538), Beck Anxiety Inventory (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.689), and Insomnia Severity Index (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.516), confirming its construct validity. Structural validity was good with a comparative fit index of 0.969, with Cronbach’s α of 0.93 indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was also satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.732). K-means clustering identified 3 distinct severity categories in individuals living with long COVID, providing a basis for personalized treatment strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The LC-SSS provides a robust and valid tool for assessing long COVID. The severity categories established via K-means clustering demonstrate significant variation in symptom severity, informing personalized treatment and improving care quality for patients with long COVID.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023416/pdfft?md5=86160a63dcd23c8386405b2f4c4a4dfc&pid=1-s2.0-S1098301524023416-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301524023416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The primary focus of this research is the proposition of a methodological framework for the clinical application of the long COVID symptoms and severity score (LC-SSS). This tool is not just a self-reported assessment instrument developed and validated but serves as a standardized, quantifiable means to monitor the diverse and persistent symptoms frequently observed in individuals with long COVID.

Methods

A 3-stage process was used to develop, validate, and establish scoring standards for the LC-SSS. Validation measures included correlations with other patient-reported measures, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s α for internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Scoring standards were determined using K-means clustering, with comparative assessments made against hierarchical clustering and the Gaussian Mixture Model.

Results

The LC-SSS showed correlations with EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (rs = −0.55), EuroQol visual analog scale (rs = −0.368), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (rs = 0.538), Beck Anxiety Inventory (rs = 0.689), and Insomnia Severity Index (rs = 0.516), confirming its construct validity. Structural validity was good with a comparative fit index of 0.969, with Cronbach’s α of 0.93 indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was also satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.732). K-means clustering identified 3 distinct severity categories in individuals living with long COVID, providing a basis for personalized treatment strategies.

Conclusions

The LC-SSS provides a robust and valid tool for assessing long COVID. The severity categories established via K-means clustering demonstrate significant variation in symptom severity, informing personalized treatment and improving care quality for patients with long COVID.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长冠状病毒病(COVID)症状和严重程度评分:开发、验证和应用。
研究目的本研究的主要重点是为长COVID症状和严重程度评分(LC-SSS)的临床应用提出一个方法框架。该工具不仅是一种经过开发和验证的自我报告评估工具,而且还是一种标准化、可量化的手段,用于监测长 COVID 患者经常出现的各种持续性症状。研究方法通过三个阶段来开发、验证和建立 LC-SSS 的评分标准。验证措施包括与其他患者报告措施的相关性、确认性因素分析、内部一致性 Cronbach's α 和测试-再测可靠性。结果 LC-SSS 与 EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level 相关(rs = -0.55)、EuroQol 视觉模拟量表(rs = -0.368)、患者健康问卷-9(rs = 0.538)、贝克焦虑量表(rs = 0.689)和失眠严重程度指数(rs = 0.516)相关,证实了其结构效度。结构效度良好,比较拟合指数为 0.969,Cronbach's α 为 0.93,表明内部一致性极佳。重测可靠性也令人满意(类内相关系数为 0.732)。K-means 聚类确定了长时 COVID 患者的 3 个不同严重程度类别,为个性化治疗策略提供了依据。通过 K-means 聚类确定的严重程度类别显示了症状严重程度的显著差异,为个性化治疗提供了依据,并提高了长程 COVID 患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Measuring Healthcare Experiences Among People With Intellectual Disability: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis of Tools and Methods Attribute Development in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Methods and Techniques to Inform Quantitative Instruments The Cost-Effectiveness of Germline BReast CAncer Gene Testing in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Followed by Cascade Testing of First-Degree Relatives of Mutation Carriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1