Value relevance of accounting numbers and sustainability information in Europe: Empirical evidence from nonfinancial companies

Alessandro Migliavacca
{"title":"Value relevance of accounting numbers and sustainability information in Europe: Empirical evidence from nonfinancial companies","authors":"Alessandro Migliavacca","doi":"10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information is considered value relevant when used by financial markets in equity valuation and is reflected in market values. The value relevance of different information, such as accounting numbers, changes according to shifts in investors’ needs. Given the rising importance of environmental and social agendas for policymakers and practitioners, this study examines whether accounting numbers have lost explanatory power and sustainability information has become value relevant. The analysis focuses on 3025 nonfinancial companies operating in the eurozone from 2005 to 2020. This study makes several contributions to the extant literature. First, analyzing the trend in the value relevance of financial accounting numbers, the results point to an overall decrease in the explanatory power of book values and earnings, particularly for environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-rated companies. However, the results indicate that ESG ratings have not gained value relevance over time. These findings have important implications for policymakers and practitioners. In line with the concept of “double materiality,” implementing ESG agendas will be possible only by redirecting corporate investment decision and increasing awareness of sustainability issues. This paper documents that such a shift has not yet been accomplished, despite the increasing commitment of the European Union to the ESG agenda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951824000260/pdfft?md5=cd14bb0ce05a5e7f584e242288936982&pid=1-s2.0-S1061951824000260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951824000260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information is considered value relevant when used by financial markets in equity valuation and is reflected in market values. The value relevance of different information, such as accounting numbers, changes according to shifts in investors’ needs. Given the rising importance of environmental and social agendas for policymakers and practitioners, this study examines whether accounting numbers have lost explanatory power and sustainability information has become value relevant. The analysis focuses on 3025 nonfinancial companies operating in the eurozone from 2005 to 2020. This study makes several contributions to the extant literature. First, analyzing the trend in the value relevance of financial accounting numbers, the results point to an overall decrease in the explanatory power of book values and earnings, particularly for environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-rated companies. However, the results indicate that ESG ratings have not gained value relevance over time. These findings have important implications for policymakers and practitioners. In line with the concept of “double materiality,” implementing ESG agendas will be possible only by redirecting corporate investment decision and increasing awareness of sustainability issues. This paper documents that such a shift has not yet been accomplished, despite the increasing commitment of the European Union to the ESG agenda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲会计数字和可持续性信息的价值相关性:来自非金融公司的经验证据
当金融市场将信息用于股票估值时,这些信息就被视为与价值相关,并反映在市场价值中。会计数字等不同信息的价值相关性会随着投资者需求的变化而变化。鉴于环境和社会议程对政策制定者和从业者的重要性日益增加,本研究探讨了会计数字是否失去了解释力,而可持续性信息是否变得与价值相关。分析的重点是 2005 年至 2020 年在欧元区运营的 3025 家非金融公司。本研究对现有文献做出了多项贡献。首先,分析了财务会计数据的价值相关性趋势,结果表明账面价值和收益的解释力总体下降,尤其是对环境、社会和治理(ESG)评级的公司。然而,结果表明,随着时间的推移,ESG 评级的价值相关性并没有提高。这些发现对政策制定者和实践者具有重要意义。根据 "双重重要性 "的概念,只有通过调整企业投资决策和提高对可持续发展问题的认识,才能落实 ESG 议程。本文指出,尽管欧盟越来越重视环境、社会和治理议程,但这种转变尚未实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation publishes articles which deal with most areas of international accounting including auditing, taxation and management accounting. The journal''s goal is to bridge the gap between academic researchers and practitioners by publishing papers that are relevant to the development of the field of accounting. Submissions are expected to make a contribution to the accounting literature, including as appropriate the international accounting literature typically found in JIAAT and other primary US-based international accounting journals as well as in leading European accounting journals. Applied research findings, critiques of current accounting practices and the measurement of their effects on business decisions, general purpose solutions to problems through models, and essays on world affairs which affect accounting practice are all within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Evolution, trends, and recent developments in international accounting studies: A synthesis of evidence published in “Research in Accounting Regulation” Why do female lead auditors charge a fee premium? evidence from the UK audit market Editorial Board Diffusion theory, economic consequences, and adoption of international standards on auditing around the world Related party transactions and earnings management under the UK different regulatory environments of the main and alternative investment markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1