Inferential confusion in the worldview of individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): a qualitative approach

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2024.008
Edward Jensen García, Guillermina Natera Rey
{"title":"Inferential confusion in the worldview of individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): a qualitative approach","authors":"Edward Jensen García, Guillermina Natera Rey","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2024.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The Inference-based Approach (IBA) is an etiologic, therapeutic research paradigm regarding inferential confusion (IC) as an exclusive metacognitive process of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). IC is the rational tendency of individuals with OCD to underrate abstract data and personal experiences and overrate hypothetical possibilities. IC therefore fosters uncertainty and facilitates the justification of obsessive constructs. IBA has noted that qualitative research on IC and the exploration of IC in non-OCD cognitive constructs are required to refine cognitive and therapeutic OCD models. This could help clarify whether OCD treatment by IBA is overlooking non-obsessive IC habits which, if left untreated, could compromise treatment success. Objective. To identify the possible influence of IC on non-obsessive, cognitive worldview constructs of individuals with OCD and to compare these constructs with those of individuals without OCD. Method. Twenty-five semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted, 15 with individuals with OCD and 10 with a comparison group without OCD or OCD symptoms. Data were collected and analyzed using Grounded Theory methodology. Results. IC was identified in the non-obsessive cognitive worldview constructs of every participant with OCD. IC was not identified in the comparative group. Discussion and conclusion. The results suggest that IC affects the rational composition of non-obsessive cognitive worldview constructs of individuals with OCD. The implications this could have for the cognitive and therapeutic models of OCD are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2024.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The Inference-based Approach (IBA) is an etiologic, therapeutic research paradigm regarding inferential confusion (IC) as an exclusive metacognitive process of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). IC is the rational tendency of individuals with OCD to underrate abstract data and personal experiences and overrate hypothetical possibilities. IC therefore fosters uncertainty and facilitates the justification of obsessive constructs. IBA has noted that qualitative research on IC and the exploration of IC in non-OCD cognitive constructs are required to refine cognitive and therapeutic OCD models. This could help clarify whether OCD treatment by IBA is overlooking non-obsessive IC habits which, if left untreated, could compromise treatment success. Objective. To identify the possible influence of IC on non-obsessive, cognitive worldview constructs of individuals with OCD and to compare these constructs with those of individuals without OCD. Method. Twenty-five semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted, 15 with individuals with OCD and 10 with a comparison group without OCD or OCD symptoms. Data were collected and analyzed using Grounded Theory methodology. Results. IC was identified in the non-obsessive cognitive worldview constructs of every participant with OCD. IC was not identified in the comparative group. Discussion and conclusion. The results suggest that IC affects the rational composition of non-obsessive cognitive worldview constructs of individuals with OCD. The implications this could have for the cognitive and therapeutic models of OCD are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症患者世界观中的推理混乱:一种定性方法
导言。基于推理的方法(IBA)是一种关于推理混乱(IC)的病因学和治疗学研究范式,是强迫症(OCD)特有的元认知过程。IC 是强迫症患者低估抽象数据和个人经历、高估假设可能性的理性倾向。因此,强迫症会助长不确定性,并为强迫症建构的合理性提供便利。国际心理咨询师协会指出,需要对强迫症认知建构的定性研究以及对非强迫症认知建构中的强迫症认知建构进行探索,以完善强迫症的认知和治疗模型。这有助于澄清国际心理咨询协会的强迫症治疗是否忽略了非强迫性的 IC 习惯,如果不加以治疗,可能会影响治疗的成功。目的。确定强迫症患者的非强迫性认知世界观建构可能受到的 IC 影响,并将这些建构与非强迫症患者的建构进行比较。方法。对 15 名强迫症患者和 10 名无强迫症或强迫症症状的对比群体进行了 25 次半结构式深度访谈。采用基础理论方法收集和分析数据。结果。在每位强迫症患者的非强迫性认知世界观建构中都发现了 IC。在对比组中没有发现 IC。讨论和结论。研究结果表明,强迫症患者的非强迫性认知世界观结构的合理构成受到 IC 的影响。本文讨论了这对强迫症认知和治疗模式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the presence of depression, anxiety, and substance use in health students from 10 Latin American countries during the COVID-19 pandemic Predictive Factors for Suicidal Behaviors among University Students in the North-Central Region of Mexico Protection and Risk Factors for Attempted Suicide in Mexican Students Majoring in Psychology The relevance of social analysis in mental health research Inferential confusion in the worldview of individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): a qualitative approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1