Article: Sustainable AI Regulation

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.54648/cola2024025
Philipp Hacker
{"title":"Article: Sustainable AI Regulation","authors":"Philipp Hacker","doi":"10.54648/cola2024025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses a critical gap in the current AI regulatory discourse by focusing on the environmental sustainability of AI and technology more broadly, a topic often overlooked both in environmental law and in technology regulation, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the EU AI Act. Recognizing AI’s significant impact on climate change and its substantial water consumption, especially in large generative models like ChatGPT, GPT-4, or Gemini, the article aims to integrate sustainability considerations into technology regulation, in three steps. First, while current EU environmental law does not directly address these issues, there is potential to reinterpret existing legislation, such as the GDPR, to support sustainability goals. Counterintuitively, the article argues that this also implies the need to balance individual rights, such as the right to erasure, with collective environmental interests. Second, based on an analysis of current law, and the proposed EU AI Act, the article suggests a suite of policy measures to align AI and technology regulation with environmental sustainability. They extend beyond mere transparency mechanisms, such as disclosing greenhouse gas footprints, to include a mix of strategies like co-regulation, sustainability by design, restrictions on training data, and consumption caps, potentially integrating AI and technology more broadly into the EU emissions trading regime. Third, this regulatory toolkit could serve as a blueprint for other technologies with high environmental impacts, such as blockchain and metaverse applications. The aim is to establish a comprehensive framework that addresses the dual fundamental societal transformations of digitization and climate change mitigation.\nAI regulation, environmental sustainability, GDPR, EU AI Act, sustainability goals","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Market Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2024025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses a critical gap in the current AI regulatory discourse by focusing on the environmental sustainability of AI and technology more broadly, a topic often overlooked both in environmental law and in technology regulation, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the EU AI Act. Recognizing AI’s significant impact on climate change and its substantial water consumption, especially in large generative models like ChatGPT, GPT-4, or Gemini, the article aims to integrate sustainability considerations into technology regulation, in three steps. First, while current EU environmental law does not directly address these issues, there is potential to reinterpret existing legislation, such as the GDPR, to support sustainability goals. Counterintuitively, the article argues that this also implies the need to balance individual rights, such as the right to erasure, with collective environmental interests. Second, based on an analysis of current law, and the proposed EU AI Act, the article suggests a suite of policy measures to align AI and technology regulation with environmental sustainability. They extend beyond mere transparency mechanisms, such as disclosing greenhouse gas footprints, to include a mix of strategies like co-regulation, sustainability by design, restrictions on training data, and consumption caps, potentially integrating AI and technology more broadly into the EU emissions trading regime. Third, this regulatory toolkit could serve as a blueprint for other technologies with high environmental impacts, such as blockchain and metaverse applications. The aim is to establish a comprehensive framework that addresses the dual fundamental societal transformations of digitization and climate change mitigation. AI regulation, environmental sustainability, GDPR, EU AI Act, sustainability goals
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章:可持续的人工智能监管
本文通过关注人工智能和更广泛的技术在环境方面的可持续性,解决了当前人工智能监管讨论中的一个重要空白,而这一话题在环境法和技术监管(如《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)或《欧盟人工智能法案》)中经常被忽视。本文认识到人工智能对气候变化的重大影响及其对水的大量消耗,尤其是在 ChatGPT、GPT-4 或 Gemini 等大型生成模型中,因此旨在分三步将可持续性因素纳入技术监管。首先,虽然目前欧盟的环境法并不直接涉及这些问题,但有可能重新解释现有法律,如 GDPR,以支持可持续发展目标。文章反其道而行之,认为这也意味着需要平衡个人权利(如删除权)与集体环境利益。其次,基于对现行法律和拟议的《欧盟人工智能法》的分析,文章提出了一系列政策措施,以使人工智能和技术监管与环境可持续性相一致。这些措施不仅包括披露温室气体足迹等单纯的透明机制,还包括共同监管、设计的可持续性、对训练数据的限制和消费上限等策略组合,有可能将人工智能和技术更广泛地纳入欧盟排放交易制度。第三,这一监管工具包可作为其他对环境影响较大的技术(如区块链和元数据应用)的蓝图。我们的目标是建立一个全面的框架,解决数字化和减缓气候变化的双重基本社会变革问题。人工智能监管、环境可持续性、GDPR、欧盟人工智能法案、可持续性目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The Common Market Law Review has provided a forum for the keenest legal minds in the fields for more than 40 years. Because of the international composition of its Editorial Board, and in view of the fact that it is able to attract contributions from all over Europe, and from the United States, the Review is able to adopt a unique approach to capitilize Community issues. Each issue contains articles dealing with matters of current interest; the authoritative treatment given to each topic ensures lasting juridical value. This pre-eminent journal brings you detailed, in-depth examination of the most pressing and far-reaching issues on Community Law.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: The passion for security in European societies Equality between EU citizens and third-country nationals when implementing European arrest warrants. The national judge and the weight of facts: O.G. v. Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri Book review: La création du Parquet européen. Simple évolution ou révolution au sein de l’espace judiciaire européen? Edited by Constance Chevallier-Govers and Anne Weyembergh (Brussels: Bruylant, 2021) Book review: Research Handbook on European Union Citizenship Law and Policy: Navigating Challenges and Crises. Edited by Dora Kostakopoulou and Daniel Thym (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022) Book review: The EU as a Global Digital Actor: Institutionalising Global Data Protection, Trade, and Cybersecurity. by Elaine Fahey (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1