Adult patients with alopecia areata report a significantly better medication adherence compared to those with atopic dermatitis: Results from a large cross-sectional cohort study

Mischa J. Mallbris , Lea Krog Nymand BS , Yuki Maria Fukuda Andersen MD, PhD , Alexander Egeberg MD, PhD
{"title":"Adult patients with alopecia areata report a significantly better medication adherence compared to those with atopic dermatitis: Results from a large cross-sectional cohort study","authors":"Mischa J. Mallbris ,&nbsp;Lea Krog Nymand BS ,&nbsp;Yuki Maria Fukuda Andersen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander Egeberg MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jdin.2024.03.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Alopecia areata (AA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic skin diseases where the suboptimal medication adherence (MA) may result in poor clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the impact of AA on MA among adults compared to AD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patient reported MA of adults with AA were compared with AD. Patients were identified from the Danish Skin Cohort, a nationwide prospective cohort of dermatological patients in Denmark. We used the Medication Adherence Report Scale- 5, a self-reporting questionnaire, to assess MA. Demographic and disease characteristics were collected. Logistic regression was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with AA reported higher MA than AD (mean 21.81 vs 18.29). Logistic regression analyses showed AA diagnosis had a statistically significant positive effect on MA (odds ratio = 3.94, 95% CI 2.01-8.89). Men reported significantly higher MA (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% CI 1.14-1.94). Current disease severity did not impact MA.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Data were self-reported by patients. Data regarding the specific treatment undergone by patients were not available.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with AA have significantly higher MA compared to patients with AD. The stability of AA patients’ symptoms may lead to higher MA due to a desire for disease control. Conversely, the sporadicity of AD symptoms could negatively affect adherence, causing fluctuations in medication use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34410,"journal":{"name":"JAAD International","volume":"16 ","pages":"Pages 79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328724000701/pdfft?md5=9554aad39cc2660e5765aedbf936afbe&pid=1-s2.0-S2666328724000701-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAD International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666328724000701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic skin diseases where the suboptimal medication adherence (MA) may result in poor clinical outcomes.

Objective

To assess the impact of AA on MA among adults compared to AD.

Methods

Patient reported MA of adults with AA were compared with AD. Patients were identified from the Danish Skin Cohort, a nationwide prospective cohort of dermatological patients in Denmark. We used the Medication Adherence Report Scale- 5, a self-reporting questionnaire, to assess MA. Demographic and disease characteristics were collected. Logistic regression was conducted.

Results

Patients with AA reported higher MA than AD (mean 21.81 vs 18.29). Logistic regression analyses showed AA diagnosis had a statistically significant positive effect on MA (odds ratio = 3.94, 95% CI 2.01-8.89). Men reported significantly higher MA (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% CI 1.14-1.94). Current disease severity did not impact MA.

Limitations

Data were self-reported by patients. Data regarding the specific treatment undergone by patients were not available.

Conclusion

Patients with AA have significantly higher MA compared to patients with AD. The stability of AA patients’ symptoms may lead to higher MA due to a desire for disease control. Conversely, the sporadicity of AD symptoms could negatively affect adherence, causing fluctuations in medication use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与异位性皮炎患者相比,成年斑秃患者的用药依从性明显更好--一项大型横断面队列研究的结果
背景斑秃(AA)和特应性皮炎(AD)都是慢性皮肤病,不理想的用药依从性(MA)可能会导致不良的临床结果。方法将成人斑秃患者报告的 MA 与成人特应性皮炎患者报告的 MA 进行比较。患者是从丹麦皮肤队列(Danish Skin Cohort)中确定的,该队列是丹麦全国范围内皮肤病患者的前瞻性队列。我们使用自我报告问卷 "用药依从性报告量表-5 "来评估用药依从性。我们还收集了人口统计学特征和疾病特征。结果AA患者的MA值高于AD患者(平均值为21.81 vs 18.29)。逻辑回归分析表明,AA 诊断对 MA 有统计学意义上的积极影响(几率比 = 3.94,95% CI 2.01-8.89)。男性报告的 MA 明显更高(几率比 = 1.49,95% CI 1.14-1.94)。目前的疾病严重程度对 MA 没有影响。结论与 AD 患者相比,AA 患者的 MA 明显更高。AA患者症状的稳定性可能会导致患者希望控制病情,从而提高MA值。相反,AD 症状的不稳定性可能会对患者的用药依从性产生负面影响,导致用药量波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAAD International
JAAD International Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
45 days
期刊最新文献
The great automatic grammatizator: On the use and misuse of large language models in scientific and academic writing Video synchronous isotretinoin management is associated with lower risk of patient attrition compared to in-person follow-up: A single-center cohort study involving propensity-score matched analysis of patients with acne COVID-19 infection or vaccination and hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review Inverse association between regional solar radiation and hospital discharges due to bullous diseases in Chile: An ecological study Geospatial analysis of dermatologist distribution and access among US seniors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1