Critical appraisal of the Colombian clinical practice guide for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of suicidal ideation and/or behaviour (adoption)

Diana Restrepo, Ana M. Zapata-Barco, Juan A. Escobar, David Mejía-Rodríguez, Daniela Parra-Dunoyer, Oscar Vargas, Luis Miguel Vélez, Iris T. Buriticá, Isabel Vélez, Sebastián Estrada, Diego Rojas-Gualdrón
{"title":"Critical appraisal of the Colombian clinical practice guide for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of suicidal ideation and/or behaviour (adoption)","authors":"Diana Restrepo,&nbsp;Ana M. Zapata-Barco,&nbsp;Juan A. Escobar,&nbsp;David Mejía-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Daniela Parra-Dunoyer,&nbsp;Oscar Vargas,&nbsp;Luis Miguel Vélez,&nbsp;Iris T. Buriticá,&nbsp;Isabel Vélez,&nbsp;Sebastián Estrada,&nbsp;Diego Rojas-Gualdrón","doi":"10.1016/j.rcpeng.2021.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0–1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions: \"scope and objective\" (0.86), \"clarity of presentation\" (0.89), \"applicability\" (0.73) and \"editorial independence\" (0.89). The lowest scores were for “participation of those involved” (0.67) and “rigour in preparation” (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74702,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530312024000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.

Methods

An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0–1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.

Results

The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions: "scope and objective" (0.86), "clarity of presentation" (0.89), "applicability" (0.73) and "editorial independence" (0.89). The lowest scores were for “participation of those involved” (0.67) and “rigour in preparation” (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.

Conclusions

The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对哥伦比亚预防、诊断和治疗自杀意念和/或行为的临床实践指南的批判性评估(通过)
导言自杀是一个复杂的全球性公共卫生问题。哥伦比亚临床实践指南为其预防、诊断和治疗提供了相关信息。该研究旨在评估哥伦比亚自杀行为临床实践指南的方法质量、可信度和适用性。方法:成立一个由 12 名评估员组成的学术小组,使用 AGREE-II 和 AGREE-REX 工具,以标准化的方式评估指南及其建议。评估范围为 0.0-1.0,以 0.7 作为适当质量的分界点。结果AGREE-II 在以下方面的总体评估结果均大于 0.7:"范围和目标"(0.86)、"表述清晰"(0.89)、"适用性"(0.73)和 "编辑独立性"(0.89)。得分最低的是 "相关人员的参与"(0.67)和 "编写的严谨性"(0.69)。在 AGREE-REX 中,所有维度的得分均低于 0.70,这表明该指南的质量和适用性较低。结论哥伦比亚自杀行为指南的采用过程是一个严格的方法论过程,但由于本地证据支持度较低,实践建议的适用性较低。有必要在国家层面加强证据的生成和综合,以便为实践建议提供更多支持和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders: A systematic review Assessing skills in psychiatry. Experience and implementation of OSCE for medical students Association between cognitive impairment and socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors in Colombian older adults Successful treatment for serious depression with suicidal risk in a heart transplant patient Telerehabilitation of subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders during confinement due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1