Study of the feasibility of outpatient sacrocolpopexy by laparoscopy

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102792
V. Collin-Bund , V. Viviani , N. Meyer , T. Goetsch , T. Boisramé , E. Faller , L. Lecointre , V. Gabriele , C. Akladios , O. Garbin , A. Host
{"title":"Study of the feasibility of outpatient sacrocolpopexy by laparoscopy","authors":"V. Collin-Bund ,&nbsp;V. Viviani ,&nbsp;N. Meyer ,&nbsp;T. Goetsch ,&nbsp;T. Boisramé ,&nbsp;E. Faller ,&nbsp;L. Lecointre ,&nbsp;V. Gabriele ,&nbsp;C. Akladios ,&nbsp;O. Garbin ,&nbsp;A. Host","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) is currently the gold standard surgical technique for treating pelvic prolapse. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in ambulatory care.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of LSCP in women who visited the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University Hospital of Strasbourg between July 2018 and December 2021. All women with indications for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for prolapse treatment who were willing to be treated as outpatients were included. The main criterion of the study was to evaluate the rate of re-hospitalization between discharge from the outpatient department after LSCP and postoperative follow-up consultations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the whole population (57/200, 28.5 %) included, 4 (7 %) were hospitalized. The quality of life was not altered with a preserved EuroQol (EQ-5D) quality of life score with a mean score of 73±18.4 standard deviation (SD) 95 % confidence interval (CI) (67.9; 78.1) on postoperative day 3 (D3) and 91.2 ± 16.3 SD 95 % CI (86.2–96) on D30. On D1, D2, D3, and D7, the anxiety rate evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score (STAI Y-A) remained low, with mean scores of 24.8 ± 9.6 SD 95 % [23.4–26.5] on D30. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure and outpatient management, with an average score of 9.6/10 (range: 8–10).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This prospective, monocentric study evaluating the feasibility of outpatient LSCP reported demonstrated low rates of complications and re-hospitalization after outpatient management. Furthermore, the patients’ quality of life was not altered, and they patients were satisfied with this type of management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 7","pages":"Article 102792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) is currently the gold standard surgical technique for treating pelvic prolapse. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in ambulatory care.

Patients and methods

This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of LSCP in women who visited the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University Hospital of Strasbourg between July 2018 and December 2021. All women with indications for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for prolapse treatment who were willing to be treated as outpatients were included. The main criterion of the study was to evaluate the rate of re-hospitalization between discharge from the outpatient department after LSCP and postoperative follow-up consultations.

Results

Among the whole population (57/200, 28.5 %) included, 4 (7 %) were hospitalized. The quality of life was not altered with a preserved EuroQol (EQ-5D) quality of life score with a mean score of 73±18.4 standard deviation (SD) 95 % confidence interval (CI) (67.9; 78.1) on postoperative day 3 (D3) and 91.2 ± 16.3 SD 95 % CI (86.2–96) on D30. On D1, D2, D3, and D7, the anxiety rate evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score (STAI Y-A) remained low, with mean scores of 24.8 ± 9.6 SD 95 % [23.4–26.5] on D30. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure and outpatient management, with an average score of 9.6/10 (range: 8–10).

Conclusion

This prospective, monocentric study evaluating the feasibility of outpatient LSCP reported demonstrated low rates of complications and re-hospitalization after outpatient management. Furthermore, the patients’ quality of life was not altered, and they patients were satisfied with this type of management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过腹腔镜进行门诊骶骨结肠切除术的可行性研究。
简介腹腔镜骶尾部结肠切除术(LSCP)是目前治疗盆腔脱垂的金标准手术技术。这项研究旨在评估腹腔镜骶尾部整形术在门诊治疗中的可行性。患者和方法这项前瞻性研究旨在评估2018年7月至2021年12月期间到斯特拉斯堡大学医院妇产科门诊就诊的女性使用LSCP的可行性。所有有腹腔镜骶骨整形术治疗子宫脱垂适应症且愿意接受门诊治疗的女性均被纳入研究范围。研究的主要标准是评估LSCP术后从门诊部出院到术后复诊之间的再住院率。结果在所有纳入人群(57/200,28.5%)中,有4人(7%)住院治疗。术后第 3 天(D3)的生活质量没有改变,EuroQol(EQ-5D)生活质量评分保持不变,平均分为 73±18.4 标准差(SD)95 % 置信区间(CI)(67.9; 78.1),D30 为 91.2 ± 16.3 SD 95 % CI(86.2-96)。在术后第 1 天、第 2 天、第 3 天和第 7 天,通过国家-特质焦虑量表(STAI Y-A)评分评估的焦虑率仍然很低,D30 天的平均得分为 24.8 ± 9.6 SD 95 % [23.4-26.5]。所有患者均对手术和门诊管理表示满意或非常满意,平均得分为 9.6/10(范围:8-10)。结论这项前瞻性、单中心研究评估了门诊 LSCP 的可行性,结果显示门诊管理后并发症和再住院率较低。此外,患者的生活质量没有改变,他们对这种治疗方式感到满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1