Prostate Radiotherapy in Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.018
Soumyajit Roy , Gagan Fervaha , Daniel E. Spratt , Yilun Sun , Amar U. Kishan , Andrew Loblaw , Shawn Malone , Michael Ong , Fred Saad , Christopher J.D. Wallis , Scott C. Morgan
{"title":"Prostate Radiotherapy in Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis","authors":"Soumyajit Roy ,&nbsp;Gagan Fervaha ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Spratt ,&nbsp;Yilun Sun ,&nbsp;Amar U. Kishan ,&nbsp;Andrew Loblaw ,&nbsp;Shawn Malone ,&nbsp;Michael Ong ,&nbsp;Fred Saad ,&nbsp;Christopher J.D. Wallis ,&nbsp;Scott C. Morgan","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>The utility of prostate radiotherapy (RT) is unclear in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving intensified systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the role of prostate RT in low-volume mHSPC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Bibliographic databases and conference proceedings were searched through July 2023 for RCTs evaluating the addition of ARPIs or prostate RT to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy, defined as ADT or ADT plus docetaxel, for the initial treatment of mHSPC. We focused exclusively on aggregate data from the low-volume mHSPC subpopulation in these trials. We pooled the treatment arms into four groups: SOC, SOC plus ARPI, SOC plus RT, and SOC plus ARPI plus RT. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). To compare treatment strategies, a fixed-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis was undertaken, while a Bayesian network meta-regression was performed to account for across-trial differences in docetaxel use as part of SOC and in proportions of patients with de novo presentation.</p></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><p>Ten RCTs comprising 4423 patients were eligible. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve scores were 0.0006, 0.45, 0.62, and 0.94 for SOC, SOC plus RT, SOC plus ARPI, and SOC plus ARPI plus RT, respectively. On a meta-regression, in a population with de novo mHSPC and no docetaxel use, we did not find sufficient evidence of a difference in OS between SOC plus ARPI plus RT versus SOC plus ARPI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% credible interval: 0.51–1.16) and SOC plus RT versus SOC plus ARPI (HR: 1.10; 95% credible interval: 0.92–1.42).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><p>There was some evidence that SOC plus ARPI plus RT reduced mortality compared with the next best strategy of SOC plus ARPI in patients with low-volume de novo mHSPC. A meta-analysis with individual patient data or an RCT is needed to confirm these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283824022395/pdfft?md5=103d51cec4daf332e16f9eda9dce73a6&pid=1-s2.0-S0302283824022395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283824022395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

The utility of prostate radiotherapy (RT) is unclear in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) receiving intensified systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the role of prostate RT in low-volume mHSPC.

Methods

Bibliographic databases and conference proceedings were searched through July 2023 for RCTs evaluating the addition of ARPIs or prostate RT to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy, defined as ADT or ADT plus docetaxel, for the initial treatment of mHSPC. We focused exclusively on aggregate data from the low-volume mHSPC subpopulation in these trials. We pooled the treatment arms into four groups: SOC, SOC plus ARPI, SOC plus RT, and SOC plus ARPI plus RT. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). To compare treatment strategies, a fixed-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis was undertaken, while a Bayesian network meta-regression was performed to account for across-trial differences in docetaxel use as part of SOC and in proportions of patients with de novo presentation.

Key findings and limitations

Ten RCTs comprising 4423 patients were eligible. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve scores were 0.0006, 0.45, 0.62, and 0.94 for SOC, SOC plus RT, SOC plus ARPI, and SOC plus ARPI plus RT, respectively. On a meta-regression, in a population with de novo mHSPC and no docetaxel use, we did not find sufficient evidence of a difference in OS between SOC plus ARPI plus RT versus SOC plus ARPI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% credible interval: 0.51–1.16) and SOC plus RT versus SOC plus ARPI (HR: 1.10; 95% credible interval: 0.92–1.42).

Conclusions and clinical implications

There was some evidence that SOC plus ARPI plus RT reduced mortality compared with the next best strategy of SOC plus ARPI in patients with low-volume de novo mHSPC. A meta-analysis with individual patient data or an RCT is needed to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低体积转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的前列腺放疗:网络 Meta 分析
背景和目的对于接受雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)和雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPIs)强化系统治疗的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)男性患者,前列腺放射治疗(RT)的作用尚不明确。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了网络荟萃分析,以研究前列腺RT在低容量mHSPC中的作用。方法检索了截至2023年7月的文献数据库和会议论文集,以了解评估在标准治疗(SOC)系统疗法(定义为ADT或ADT加多西他赛)基础上增加ARPIs或前列腺RT用于mHSPC初始治疗的RCT。我们只关注这些试验中低容量 mHSPC 亚群的总体数据。我们将治疗方案分为四组:SOC组、SOC加ARPI组、SOC加RT组和SOC加ARPI加RT组。主要结果是总生存期(OS)。为了比较治疗策略,我们进行了一项固定效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,同时进行了一项贝叶斯网络荟萃回归,以考虑作为SOC一部分的多西他赛在各试验中的使用差异以及新发病患者比例的差异。SOC、SOC加RT、SOC加ARPI和SOC加ARPI加RT的累积排名曲线下表面得分分别为0.0006、0.45、0.62和0.94。在新发 mHSPC 且未使用多西他赛的人群中进行荟萃回归时,我们没有发现足够的证据表明 SOC 加 ARPI 加 RT 与 SOC 加 ARPI 相比在 OS 方面存在差异(危险比 [HR]:0.76;95% 可信区间:0.51-1.16),也没有发现 SOC 加 RT 与 SOC 加 ARPI 加 RT 相比在 OS 方面存在差异(危险比 [HR]:0.76;95% 可信区间:0.51-1.16)。结论和临床意义有证据表明,与次优策略SOC加ARPI相比,SOC加ARPI加RT可降低低容量新发mHSPC患者的死亡率。要证实这些研究结果,需要进行包含单个患者数据的荟萃分析或 RCT 分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
期刊最新文献
First and Second-line Treatments in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Re: Maarten De Rooij, Clare Allen, Jasper J. Twilt, et al. PI-QUAL Version 2: An Update of a Standardised Scoring System for the Assessment of Image Quality of Prostate MRI. Eur Radiol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10795-4 Challenges and Considerations in Modern Adjuvant Therapy Trials in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Call to Power Best Practice in Using Social Media: The European Association of Urology Position Statement What’s in a Name? Why Words Matter in Advanced Prostate Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1