Evaluation of the efficacy of silymarin and dexmedetomidine on kidney and lung tissue in the treatment of sepsis in rats with cecal perforation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Experimental and therapeutic medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.3892/etm.2024.12530
Aydin Yavuz, Ayşegül Küçük, Aydan İremnur Ergörün, Ali Doğan Dursun, Zeynep Yiğman, Metin Alkan, Mustafa Arslan
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of silymarin and dexmedetomidine on kidney and lung tissue in the treatment of sepsis in rats with cecal perforation.","authors":"Aydin Yavuz, Ayşegül Küçük, Aydan İremnur Ergörün, Ali Doğan Dursun, Zeynep Yiğman, Metin Alkan, Mustafa Arslan","doi":"10.3892/etm.2024.12530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that develops in the host against microorganisms. This response develops away from the primary infection site and results in end-organ damage. The present study aimed to investigate the protective and therapeutic effects on lung and kidney tissue of silymarin (S) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) applied 1 h before and after sepsis induced by the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) method in rats. A total of 62 rats was randomly divided into eight groups: i) Control (n=6); ii) cecal perforation (CLP; n=8); iii) S + CLP (n=8; S + CLP; S administered 1 h before CPL); iv) CLP + S (n=8; S administered 1 h after CLP); v) DEX + CLP (n=8; D + CLP; DEX administered 1 h before CLP); vi) CLP + D (n=8; DEX administered 1 h after CLP); vii) SD + CLP (n=8; S and DEX administered 1 h before CLP) and viii) CLP + SD (n=8; S and DEX administered 1 h after CLP). After the cecum filled with stool, it was tied with 3/0 silk under the ileocecal valve and the anterior surface of the cecum was punctured twice with an 18-gauge needle. A total of 100 mg/kg silymarin and 100 µg/kg DEX were administered intraperitoneally to the treatment groups. Lung and kidney tissue samples were collected to evaluate biochemical and histopathological parameters. In the histopathological examination, all parameters indicating kidney injury; interstitial edema, peritubular capillary dilatation, vacuolization, ablation of tubular epithelium from the basement membrane, loss of brush border in the proximal tubule epithelium, cell swelling and nuclear defragmentation; were increased in the CLP compared with the control group. Silymarin administration increased kidney damage, including ablation of tubular epithelium from the basement membrane, compared with that in the CLP group. DEX significantly reduced kidney damage compared with the CLP and silymarin groups. The co-administration of DEX + silymarin decreased kidney damage, although it was not as effective as DEX-alone. To conclude, intraperitoneal DEX ameliorated injury in CLP rats. DEX + silymarin partially ameliorated injury but silymarin administration increased damage. As a result, silymarin has a negative effects with this dosage and DEX has a protective effect. In the present study, it was determined that using the two drugs together had a greater therapeutic effect than silymarin and no differences in the effects were not observed any when the application times of the agents were changed.","PeriodicalId":12285,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and therapeutic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that develops in the host against microorganisms. This response develops away from the primary infection site and results in end-organ damage. The present study aimed to investigate the protective and therapeutic effects on lung and kidney tissue of silymarin (S) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) applied 1 h before and after sepsis induced by the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) method in rats. A total of 62 rats was randomly divided into eight groups: i) Control (n=6); ii) cecal perforation (CLP; n=8); iii) S + CLP (n=8; S + CLP; S administered 1 h before CPL); iv) CLP + S (n=8; S administered 1 h after CLP); v) DEX + CLP (n=8; D + CLP; DEX administered 1 h before CLP); vi) CLP + D (n=8; DEX administered 1 h after CLP); vii) SD + CLP (n=8; S and DEX administered 1 h before CLP) and viii) CLP + SD (n=8; S and DEX administered 1 h after CLP). After the cecum filled with stool, it was tied with 3/0 silk under the ileocecal valve and the anterior surface of the cecum was punctured twice with an 18-gauge needle. A total of 100 mg/kg silymarin and 100 µg/kg DEX were administered intraperitoneally to the treatment groups. Lung and kidney tissue samples were collected to evaluate biochemical and histopathological parameters. In the histopathological examination, all parameters indicating kidney injury; interstitial edema, peritubular capillary dilatation, vacuolization, ablation of tubular epithelium from the basement membrane, loss of brush border in the proximal tubule epithelium, cell swelling and nuclear defragmentation; were increased in the CLP compared with the control group. Silymarin administration increased kidney damage, including ablation of tubular epithelium from the basement membrane, compared with that in the CLP group. DEX significantly reduced kidney damage compared with the CLP and silymarin groups. The co-administration of DEX + silymarin decreased kidney damage, although it was not as effective as DEX-alone. To conclude, intraperitoneal DEX ameliorated injury in CLP rats. DEX + silymarin partially ameliorated injury but silymarin administration increased damage. As a result, silymarin has a negative effects with this dosage and DEX has a protective effect. In the present study, it was determined that using the two drugs together had a greater therapeutic effect than silymarin and no differences in the effects were not observed any when the application times of the agents were changed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估水飞蓟素和右美托咪定治疗大鼠盲肠穿孔败血症对肾脏和肺组织的疗效
败血症是宿主对微生物产生的一种全身炎症反应综合征。这种反应远离原发感染部位,并导致终末器官损伤。本研究旨在探讨水飞蓟素(S)和右美托咪定(DEX)在大鼠盲肠结扎法(CLP)诱发败血症前后 1 小时内对肺和肾组织的保护和治疗作用。共 62 只大鼠被随机分为 8 组:i) 对照组(n=6);ii) 盲肠穿孔组(CLP;n=8);iii) S + CLP 组(n=8;S + CLP;CPL 前 1 小时给予 S);iv) CLP + S 组(n=8;CLP 后 1 小时给予 S);v) DEX + CLP 组(n=8;D + CLP;CLP 前 1 小时给予 DEX);vi) CLP + D 组(n=8;CLP 后 1 小时给予 DEX);vii) SD + CLP 组(n=8;S + CLP;CPL 前 1 小时给予 SD)。SD + CLP(n=8;S 和 DEX 在 CLP 前 1 小时给药)和 viii)CLP+SD(n=8;S和DEX在CLP后1小时给药)。盲肠充满粪便后,在回盲瓣下用 3/0 号丝线扎紧,然后用 18 号针头在盲肠前表面穿刺两次。治疗组腹腔注射 100 mg/kg 水飞蓟素和 100 µg/kg DEX。收集肺和肾组织样本以评估生化和组织病理学参数。在组织病理学检查中,与对照组相比,中电组中所有表明肾脏损伤的参数(间质水肿、肾小管周围毛细血管扩张、空泡化、肾小管上皮与基底膜剥离、近端肾小管上皮刷状缘缺失、细胞肿胀和核碎裂)均有所增加。与中性粒细胞白蛋白组相比,服用水飞蓟素增加了肾脏损伤,包括肾小管上皮细胞基底膜缺损。与中药组和水飞蓟素组相比,DEX能明显减轻肾损伤。联合使用DEX+水飞蓟素可减少肾损伤,但效果不如单独使用DEX。总之,腹腔注射 DEX 可改善 CLP 大鼠的损伤。DEX+水飞蓟素可部分缓解损伤,但水飞蓟素的用药会加重损伤。因此,该剂量的水飞蓟素具有负面影响,而 DEX 具有保护作用。在本研究中,两种药物同时使用的治疗效果要优于水飞蓟素,而且在改变药物使用时间时也没有观察到效果上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental and therapeutic medicine
Experimental and therapeutic medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
570
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Off‑label and unapproved pediatric drug utilization: A meta‑analysis. Multivariate analysis of blood parameters for predicting mortality in patients with hip fractures. New insights on the link between Epstein‑Barr virus infection and cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases (Review). Peptic ulcer induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors successfully treated with glucocorticoids: A report of three cases and a literature review. Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1