William Diymba Dzemo, Oriel Thekisoe, Patrick Vudriko
{"title":"Risk factors contributing to tick-acaricide control failure in communal areas of the Oliver Tambo district eastern cape province, South Africa","authors":"William Diymba Dzemo, Oriel Thekisoe, Patrick Vudriko","doi":"10.1007/s10493-024-00910-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Application of chemical acaricides in the control of ticks has led to the problem of tick-acaricide control failure. To obtain an understanding of the possible risk factors involved in this tick-acaricide control failure, this study investigated tick control practices on communal farms in the north-eastern part of the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. A semi-structured questionnaire designed to document specific farm attributes and acaricide usage practices was administered at 94 communal farms from the Oliver Tambo District municipality of the ECP. Data collected indicated that the main acaricide chemicals used at plunge dips of inland and coastal areas were synthetic pyrethroid formulations. Most (75%) farmers claimed not to have noticed a significant reduction in numbers of actively feeding and growing ticks on cattle after several acaricide treatments. Based on the farmers’ perceptions, leading factors that could have led to tick-acaricide control failure included: weak strength of the dip solution (76%); poor structural state of dip tanks (42%); and irregular tick control (21%). The rearing of crossbreeds of local and exotic cattle breeds, perceived weak strength of the dip solution and high frequency of acaricide treatment, were statistically associated with proportions of farms reporting tick-acaricide control failure. Furthermore, approximately 50% of farms reported at least four tick control malpractices, which could have resulted in the emergence and spread of tick-acaricide control failure. Other sub-optimal tick control practices encountered included incorrect acaricide rotation, and failure to treat all cattle in a herd. This data will inform and guide the development of management strategies for tick-acaricide control failure and resistance in communal farming areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":12088,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Applied Acarology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00910-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Application of chemical acaricides in the control of ticks has led to the problem of tick-acaricide control failure. To obtain an understanding of the possible risk factors involved in this tick-acaricide control failure, this study investigated tick control practices on communal farms in the north-eastern part of the Eastern Cape Province (ECP) of South Africa. A semi-structured questionnaire designed to document specific farm attributes and acaricide usage practices was administered at 94 communal farms from the Oliver Tambo District municipality of the ECP. Data collected indicated that the main acaricide chemicals used at plunge dips of inland and coastal areas were synthetic pyrethroid formulations. Most (75%) farmers claimed not to have noticed a significant reduction in numbers of actively feeding and growing ticks on cattle after several acaricide treatments. Based on the farmers’ perceptions, leading factors that could have led to tick-acaricide control failure included: weak strength of the dip solution (76%); poor structural state of dip tanks (42%); and irregular tick control (21%). The rearing of crossbreeds of local and exotic cattle breeds, perceived weak strength of the dip solution and high frequency of acaricide treatment, were statistically associated with proportions of farms reporting tick-acaricide control failure. Furthermore, approximately 50% of farms reported at least four tick control malpractices, which could have resulted in the emergence and spread of tick-acaricide control failure. Other sub-optimal tick control practices encountered included incorrect acaricide rotation, and failure to treat all cattle in a herd. This data will inform and guide the development of management strategies for tick-acaricide control failure and resistance in communal farming areas.
应用化学杀螨剂控制蜱虫导致了蜱虫杀螨剂控制失败的问题。为了了解蜱虫杀螨剂控制失败可能涉及的风险因素,本研究调查了南非东开普省(ECP)东北部公共农场的蜱虫控制方法。研究人员在东开普省奥利弗-坦博区(Oliver Tambo District municipality)的94个公社农场发放了一份半结构式问卷,旨在记录农场的具体属性和杀螨剂的使用方法。收集到的数据表明,内陆和沿海地区在浸种时使用的主要杀螨剂是合成拟除虫菊酯制剂。大多数(75%)农民声称,经过几次杀螨剂处理后,没有发现牛身上活跃觅食和生长的蜱虫数量有明显减少。根据养殖户的看法,可能导致蜱虫杀螨剂控制失败的主要因素包括:浸渍溶液的强度弱(76%);浸渍槽的结构状态差(42%);以及蜱虫控制不规范(21%)。饲养本地牛和外来牛的杂交品种、认为浸液强度弱和杀螨剂处理频率高与报告杀蜱灭螨失败的农场比例有统计学关联。此外,约 50%的农场报告了至少四种蜱虫控制不当做法,这可能导致蜱虫杀螨剂控制失败的出现和蔓延。其他次优的蜱虫控制措施还包括不正确的杀螨剂轮换以及未对牛群中的所有牛只进行治疗。这些数据将为制定公社农业区蜱虫杀螨剂控制失败和抗药性的管理策略提供信息和指导。
期刊介绍:
Experimental and Applied Acarology publishes peer-reviewed original papers describing advances in basic and applied research on mites and ticks. Coverage encompasses all Acari, including those of environmental, agricultural, medical and veterinary importance, and all the ways in which they interact with other organisms (plants, arthropods and other animals). The subject matter draws upon a wide variety of disciplines, including evolutionary biology, ecology, epidemiology, physiology, biochemistry, toxicology, immunology, genetics, molecular biology and pest management sciences.