A randomized controlled educational pilot trial of interictal epileptiform discharge identification for neurology residents

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epileptic Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1002/epd2.20229
Fábio A. Nascimento, Jin Jing, Christopher Traner, Wan Yee Kong, Marcia Olandoski, Srishti Kapur, Erik Duhaime, Roy Strowd, Jeremy Moeller, M. Brandon Westover
{"title":"A randomized controlled educational pilot trial of interictal epileptiform discharge identification for neurology residents","authors":"Fábio A. Nascimento,&nbsp;Jin Jing,&nbsp;Christopher Traner,&nbsp;Wan Yee Kong,&nbsp;Marcia Olandoski,&nbsp;Srishti Kapur,&nbsp;Erik Duhaime,&nbsp;Roy Strowd,&nbsp;Jeremy Moeller,&nbsp;M. Brandon Westover","doi":"10.1002/epd2.20229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of an educational program leveraging technology-enhanced learning and retrieval practice to teach trainees how to correctly identify interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a bi-institutional prospective randomized controlled educational trial involving junior neurology residents. The intervention consisted of three video tutorials focused on the six IFCN criteria for IED identification and rating 500 candidate IEDs with instant feedback either on a web browser (intervention 1) or an iOS app (intervention 2). The control group underwent no educational intervention (“inactive control”). All residents completed a survey and a test at the onset and offset of the study. Performance metrics were calculated for each participant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one residents completed the study: control (<i>n</i> = 8); intervention 1 (<i>n</i> = 6); intervention 2 (<i>n</i> = 7). All but two had no prior EEG experience. Intervention 1 residents improved from baseline (mean) in multiple metrics including AUC (.74; .85; <i>p</i> &lt; .05), sensitivity (.53; .75; <i>p</i> &lt; .05), and level of confidence (LOC) in identifying IEDs/committing patients to therapy (1.33; 2.33; <i>p</i> &lt; .05). Intervention 2 residents improved in multiple metrics including AUC (.81; .86; <i>p</i> &lt; .05) and LOC in identifying IEDs (2.00; 3.14; <i>p</i> &lt; .05) and spike–wave discharges (2.00; 3.14; <i>p</i> &lt; .05). Controls had no significant improvements in any measure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This program led to significant subjective and objective improvements in IED identification. Rating candidate IEDs with instant feedback on a web browser (intervention 1) generated greater objective improvement in comparison to rating candidate IEDs on an iOS app (intervention 2). This program can complement trainee education concerning IED identification.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":"26 4","pages":"444-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epd2.20229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of an educational program leveraging technology-enhanced learning and retrieval practice to teach trainees how to correctly identify interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs).

Methods

This was a bi-institutional prospective randomized controlled educational trial involving junior neurology residents. The intervention consisted of three video tutorials focused on the six IFCN criteria for IED identification and rating 500 candidate IEDs with instant feedback either on a web browser (intervention 1) or an iOS app (intervention 2). The control group underwent no educational intervention (“inactive control”). All residents completed a survey and a test at the onset and offset of the study. Performance metrics were calculated for each participant.

Results

Twenty-one residents completed the study: control (n = 8); intervention 1 (n = 6); intervention 2 (n = 7). All but two had no prior EEG experience. Intervention 1 residents improved from baseline (mean) in multiple metrics including AUC (.74; .85; p < .05), sensitivity (.53; .75; p < .05), and level of confidence (LOC) in identifying IEDs/committing patients to therapy (1.33; 2.33; p < .05). Intervention 2 residents improved in multiple metrics including AUC (.81; .86; p < .05) and LOC in identifying IEDs (2.00; 3.14; p < .05) and spike–wave discharges (2.00; 3.14; p < .05). Controls had no significant improvements in any measure.

Significance

This program led to significant subjective and objective improvements in IED identification. Rating candidate IEDs with instant feedback on a web browser (intervention 1) generated greater objective improvement in comparison to rating candidate IEDs on an iOS app (intervention 2). This program can complement trainee education concerning IED identification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对神经内科住院医师的发作间期癫痫样放电识别随机对照教育试点试验
目的评估利用技术强化学习和检索练习教授学员如何正确识别发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)的教育计划的有效性。方法这是一项双机构前瞻性随机对照教育试验,涉及神经内科低年级住院医师。干预措施包括三段视频教程,重点是 IFCN 鉴定 IED 的六项标准,以及通过网络浏览器(干预措施 1)或 iOS 应用程序(干预措施 2)对 500 个候选 IED 进行评级并提供即时反馈。对照组不进行教育干预("非活动对照")。所有居民都在研究开始和结束时完成了调查和测试。结果21 名住院医师完成了研究:对照组(8 人);干预 1 组(6 人);干预 2 组(7 人)。除两人外,其余人员之前均无脑电图经验。干预 1 的住院医师在多个指标上都比基线(平均值)有所提高,包括 AUC(.74;.85;p <;.05)、灵敏度(.53;.75;p <;.05)和识别 IED/让患者接受治疗的信心水平 (LOC)(1.33;2.33;p <;.05)。干预 2 的住院医师在多个指标上都有所改善,包括 AUC(.81;.86;p <;.05)和识别 IED 的 LOC(2.00;3.14;p <;.05)以及尖波放电(2.00;3.14;p <;.05)。该项目在识别简易爆炸装置方面取得了明显的主观和客观进步。与通过 iOS 应用程序(干预 2)对候选 IED 进行评级相比,通过网络浏览器(干预 1)对候选 IED 进行评级并提供即时反馈,客观上有了更大的提高。该程序可作为受训人员简易爆炸装置识别教育的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Surface electromyography patterns of epileptic seizures. Genetic neonatal seizures in the neonatal intensive care unit: Diagnostic and prognostic implications for three families. Nucleus accumbens shell electrical lesion attenuates seizures and gliosis in chronic temporal lobe epilepsy rats. Slow alpha variant: A normal EEG pattern. Retrospective characterization of seizure semiology and treatment using continuous video-EEG monitoring in neonatal encephalopathy in Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1