The Relationship of Coronary Thrombus Burden and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Score in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1177/10760296241237232
Gökhan Coşkun, Cem Ozde, Osman Kayapinar, Gulsah Aktore, Ensar Ekşi, Hamdi Afşin, Ahmet Egemen Sayın
{"title":"The Relationship of Coronary Thrombus Burden and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Score in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Gökhan Coşkun, Cem Ozde, Osman Kayapinar, Gulsah Aktore, Ensar Ekşi, Hamdi Afşin, Ahmet Egemen Sayın","doi":"10.1177/10760296241237232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) score is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, its relationship with coronary thrombus burden is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the ATRIA score and thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Materials and MethodsThe study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional observational study. Our study included 319 patients who were prospectively admitted with STEMI between January 2021 and April 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups with low thrombus burden (LTB) (grade <3) and high thrombus burden (HTB) (grade ≥3). ATRIA score was calculated and recorded for all patients. ATRIA scores of both groups were compared.ResultsIn our study, 58.9% ( n = 188) of patients in the LTB group and 41% ( n = 131) of patients in the HTB group. The ATRIA risk score ( p < .001) was significantly higher in the HTB group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ATRIA score, glomerular filtration rate, hypertensıon, abciximab usage, and no-reflow were found to be independent predictors of HTB in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, ATRIA score >4 had a sensitivity of 66.2% and specificity of 95.2%, and ATRIA score >8 sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100% predicted HTB.ConclusionIn this study, we found that thrombus burden may be associated with ATRIA risk score in patients presenting with STEMI.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241237232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) score is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. However, its relationship with coronary thrombus burden is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the ATRIA score and thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Materials and MethodsThe study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional observational study. Our study included 319 patients who were prospectively admitted with STEMI between January 2021 and April 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups with low thrombus burden (LTB) (grade <3) and high thrombus burden (HTB) (grade ≥3). ATRIA score was calculated and recorded for all patients. ATRIA scores of both groups were compared.ResultsIn our study, 58.9% ( n = 188) of patients in the LTB group and 41% ( n = 131) of patients in the HTB group. The ATRIA risk score ( p < .001) was significantly higher in the HTB group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ATRIA score, glomerular filtration rate, hypertensıon, abciximab usage, and no-reflow were found to be independent predictors of HTB in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, ATRIA score >4 had a sensitivity of 66.2% and specificity of 95.2%, and ATRIA score >8 sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100% predicted HTB.ConclusionIn this study, we found that thrombus burden may be associated with ATRIA risk score in patients presenting with STEMI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉血栓负担与抗凝及心房颤动危险因素(ATRIA)评分的关系
背景心房颤动中的抗凝和危险因素(ATRIA)评分与不良心血管事件有关。然而,其与冠状动脉血栓负荷的关系尚不明确。因此,我们旨在研究接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的 ATRIA 评分与血栓负荷之间的关系。我们的研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间前瞻性收治的 319 例 STEMI 患者。患者被分为低血栓负荷(LTB)(3级)和高血栓负荷(HTB)(≥3级)两组。计算并记录所有患者的 ATRIA 评分。结果在我们的研究中,LTB 组有 58.9% 的患者(n = 188),HTB 组有 41% 的患者(n = 131)。HTB 组的 ATRIA 风险评分 ( p < .001) 明显高于 LTB 组。在多变量逻辑回归分析中发现,ATRIA 评分、肾小球滤过率、高血压、阿昔单抗的使用和无复流是接受初级 PCI 的 STEMI 患者发生 HTB 的独立预测因素。在接受者操作特征分析中,ATRIA 评分 4 预测 HTB 的敏感性为 66.2%,特异性为 95.2%;ATRIA 评分 8 预测 HTB 的敏感性为 98%,特异性为 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1