Sequential bilateral total ankle replacements: No difference in patient-reported outcomes between the first and second ankle

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.005
{"title":"Sequential bilateral total ankle replacements: No difference in patient-reported outcomes between the first and second ankle","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Total ankle replacement is an established treatment for end-stage arthritis. However, there is little data examining outcomes in sequential bilateral replacements. This study aimed to compare outcomes between first and second ankles in sequential replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients were retrospectively contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire including the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D-3 L, and a question assessing satisfaction. Electronic records identified demographics, procedural details, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty patients underwent sequential bilateral ankle replacement over the study period. At a mean follow-up of four years, 18 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between first and second ankles in terms of MOXFQ score, EQ-5D-3 L or satisfaction. Eleven complications were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We report excellent outcomes after sequential bilateral ankle replacement with no difference in outcomes between first and second ankles. These results can be used to counsel patients in the future and manage expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 520-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124000754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Total ankle replacement is an established treatment for end-stage arthritis. However, there is little data examining outcomes in sequential bilateral replacements. This study aimed to compare outcomes between first and second ankles in sequential replacement.

Methods

Patients were retrospectively contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire including the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D-3 L, and a question assessing satisfaction. Electronic records identified demographics, procedural details, and complications.

Results

Twenty patients underwent sequential bilateral ankle replacement over the study period. At a mean follow-up of four years, 18 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between first and second ankles in terms of MOXFQ score, EQ-5D-3 L or satisfaction. Eleven complications were noted.

Conclusions

We report excellent outcomes after sequential bilateral ankle replacement with no difference in outcomes between first and second ankles. These results can be used to counsel patients in the future and manage expectations.

Level of evidence

IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续双侧全踝关节置换术:第一踝关节和第二踝关节的患者报告结果无差异
全踝关节置换术是一种治疗终末期关节炎的成熟疗法。然而,很少有数据研究双侧顺序置换的疗效。本研究旨在比较顺序置换术中第一踝和第二踝的治疗效果。研究人员回顾性地联系了患者,让他们填写一份随访问卷,其中包括曼彻斯特-牛津足部问卷(MOXFQ)、EQ-5D-3 L和一个评估满意度的问题。电子记录确定了人口统计学、手术细节和并发症。在研究期间,20 名患者先后接受了双侧踝关节置换术。在平均四年的随访中,有 18 名患者完成了随访问卷。在 MOXFQ 评分、EQ-5D-3 L 或满意度方面,第一踝关节和第二踝关节之间没有明显的统计学差异。共发现 11 例并发症。我们报告了双侧踝关节置换术后的良好疗效,第一踝关节和第二踝关节的疗效没有差异。这些结果可用于今后对患者的指导和期望管理。IV.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Integrating weightbearing CT findings into evaluation of conventional radiographs in progressive collapsing foot deformity. Open and all-inside arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould for chronic lateral ankle instability: A comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curves. Impact of dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment and biomechanics of patients with insertional achilles tendinopathy; A weightbearing CT-based simulation study. A systematic review of outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with INBONE II. Factors influencing the speed of correction speed of distal tibial valgus deformity in children with percutaneous epiphyseodesis using transphyseal screw.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1