P1′ specificity of the S219V/R203G mutant tobacco etch virus protease

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1002/prot.26693
Mária Golda, Gyula Hoffka, Scott Cherry, Joseph E. Tropea, George T. Lountos, David S. Waugh, Alexander Wlodawer, József Tőzsér, János András Mótyán
{"title":"P1′ specificity of the S219V/R203G mutant tobacco etch virus protease","authors":"Mária Golda, Gyula Hoffka, Scott Cherry, Joseph E. Tropea, George T. Lountos, David S. Waugh, Alexander Wlodawer, József Tőzsér, János András Mótyán","doi":"10.1002/prot.26693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proteases that recognize linear amino acid sequences with high specificity became indispensable tools of recombinant protein technology for the removal of various fusion tags. Due to its stringent sequence specificity, the catalytic domain of the nuclear inclusion cysteine protease of tobacco etch virus (TEV PR) is also a widely applied reagent for enzymatic removal of fusion tags. For this reason, efforts have been made to improve its stability and modify its specificity. For example, P1′ autoproteolytic cleavage‐resistant mutant (S219V) TEV PR was found not only to be nearly impervious to self‐inactivation, but also exhibited greater stability and catalytic efficiency than the wild‐type enzyme. An R203G substitution has been reported to further relax the P1′ specificity of the enzyme, however, these results were obtained from crude intracellular assays. Until now, there has been no rigorous comparison of the P1′ specificity of the S219V and S219V/R203G mutants in vitro, under carefully controlled conditions. Here, we compare the P1′ amino acid preferences of these single and double TEV PR mutants. The in vitro analysis was performed by using recombinant protein substrates representing 20 P1′ variants of the consensus TENLYFQ*SGT cleavage site, and synthetic oligopeptide substrates were also applied to study a limited set of the most preferred variants. In addition, the enzyme–substrate interactions were analyzed in silico. The results indicate highly similar P1′ preferences for both enzymes, many side‐chains can be accommodated by the S1′ binding sites, but the kinetic assays revealed lower catalytic efficiency for the S219V/R203G than for the S219V mutant.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26693","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proteases that recognize linear amino acid sequences with high specificity became indispensable tools of recombinant protein technology for the removal of various fusion tags. Due to its stringent sequence specificity, the catalytic domain of the nuclear inclusion cysteine protease of tobacco etch virus (TEV PR) is also a widely applied reagent for enzymatic removal of fusion tags. For this reason, efforts have been made to improve its stability and modify its specificity. For example, P1′ autoproteolytic cleavage‐resistant mutant (S219V) TEV PR was found not only to be nearly impervious to self‐inactivation, but also exhibited greater stability and catalytic efficiency than the wild‐type enzyme. An R203G substitution has been reported to further relax the P1′ specificity of the enzyme, however, these results were obtained from crude intracellular assays. Until now, there has been no rigorous comparison of the P1′ specificity of the S219V and S219V/R203G mutants in vitro, under carefully controlled conditions. Here, we compare the P1′ amino acid preferences of these single and double TEV PR mutants. The in vitro analysis was performed by using recombinant protein substrates representing 20 P1′ variants of the consensus TENLYFQ*SGT cleavage site, and synthetic oligopeptide substrates were also applied to study a limited set of the most preferred variants. In addition, the enzyme–substrate interactions were analyzed in silico. The results indicate highly similar P1′ preferences for both enzymes, many side‐chains can be accommodated by the S1′ binding sites, but the kinetic assays revealed lower catalytic efficiency for the S219V/R203G than for the S219V mutant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
S219V/R203G 突变体烟草蚀变病毒蛋白酶的 P1′特异性
能高度特异性识别线性氨基酸序列的蛋白酶已成为重组蛋白技术中去除各种融合标记不可或缺的工具。由于其严格的序列特异性,烟草蚀变病毒核包涵半胱氨酸蛋白酶(TEV PR)的催化结构域也是一种广泛应用于酶解去除融合标记的试剂。因此,人们一直在努力提高其稳定性并改变其特异性。例如,研究发现抗 P1′自蛋白水解裂解的突变体(S219V)TEV PR 不仅几乎不会自失活,而且比野生型酶具有更高的稳定性和催化效率。据报道,R203G 取代进一步放宽了该酶的 P1′特异性,但这些结果都是通过粗略的细胞内测定获得的。到目前为止,还没有在严格控制的条件下对 S219V 和 S219V/R203G 突变体的 P1′特异性进行体外严格比较。在这里,我们比较了这些单TEV PR突变体和双TEV PR突变体的P1′氨基酸偏好。体外分析使用了重组蛋白底物,代表了共识 TENLYFQ*SGT 裂解位点的 20 个 P1′变体,还使用了合成寡肽底物来研究一组有限的最偏好变体。此外,还对酶与底物之间的相互作用进行了硅学分析。结果表明,两种酶的 P1′偏好高度相似,S1′结合位点可以容纳许多侧链,但动力学测定显示 S219V/R203G 的催化效率低于 S219V 突变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1