James K Ruffle, Samia Mohinta, Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau, Rebekah Rajiah, Faith Lee, Sebastian Brandner, Parashkev Nachev, Harpreet Hyare
{"title":"VASARI-auto: equitable, efficient, and economical featurisation of glioma MRI","authors":"James K Ruffle, Samia Mohinta, Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau, Rebekah Rajiah, Faith Lee, Sebastian Brandner, Parashkev Nachev, Harpreet Hyare","doi":"arxiv-2404.15318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The VASARI MRI feature set is a quantitative system designed to standardise\nglioma imaging descriptions. Though effective, deriving VASARI is\ntime-consuming and seldom used in clinical practice. This is a problem that\nmachine learning could plausibly automate. Using glioma data from 1172\npatients, we developed VASARI-auto, an automated labelling software applied to\nboth open-source lesion masks and our openly available tumour segmentation\nmodel. In parallel, two consultant neuroradiologists independently quantified\nVASARI features in a subsample of 100 glioblastoma cases. We quantified: 1)\nagreement across neuroradiologists and VASARI-auto; 2) calibration of\nperformance equity; 3) an economic workforce analysis; and 4) fidelity in\npredicting patient survival. Tumour segmentation was compatible with the\ncurrent state of the art and equally performant regardless of age or sex. A\nmodest inter-rater variability between in-house neuroradiologists was\ncomparable to between neuroradiologists and VASARI-auto, with far higher\nagreement between VASARI-auto methods. The time taken for neuroradiologists to\nderive VASARI was substantially higher than VASARI-auto (mean time per case 317\nvs. 3 seconds). A UK hospital workforce analysis forecast that three years of\nVASARI featurisation would demand 29,777 consultant neuroradiologist workforce\nhours ({\\pounds}1,574,935), reducible to 332 hours of computing time (and\n{\\pounds}146 of power) with VASARI-auto. The best-performing survival model\nutilised VASARI-auto features as opposed to those derived by neuroradiologists.\nVASARI-auto is a highly efficient automated labelling system with equitable\nperformance across patient age or sex, a favourable economic profile if used as\na decision support tool, and with non-inferior fidelity in downstream patient\nsurvival prediction. Future work should iterate upon and integrate such tools\nto enhance patient care.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.15318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The VASARI MRI feature set is a quantitative system designed to standardise
glioma imaging descriptions. Though effective, deriving VASARI is
time-consuming and seldom used in clinical practice. This is a problem that
machine learning could plausibly automate. Using glioma data from 1172
patients, we developed VASARI-auto, an automated labelling software applied to
both open-source lesion masks and our openly available tumour segmentation
model. In parallel, two consultant neuroradiologists independently quantified
VASARI features in a subsample of 100 glioblastoma cases. We quantified: 1)
agreement across neuroradiologists and VASARI-auto; 2) calibration of
performance equity; 3) an economic workforce analysis; and 4) fidelity in
predicting patient survival. Tumour segmentation was compatible with the
current state of the art and equally performant regardless of age or sex. A
modest inter-rater variability between in-house neuroradiologists was
comparable to between neuroradiologists and VASARI-auto, with far higher
agreement between VASARI-auto methods. The time taken for neuroradiologists to
derive VASARI was substantially higher than VASARI-auto (mean time per case 317
vs. 3 seconds). A UK hospital workforce analysis forecast that three years of
VASARI featurisation would demand 29,777 consultant neuroradiologist workforce
hours ({\pounds}1,574,935), reducible to 332 hours of computing time (and
{\pounds}146 of power) with VASARI-auto. The best-performing survival model
utilised VASARI-auto features as opposed to those derived by neuroradiologists.
VASARI-auto is a highly efficient automated labelling system with equitable
performance across patient age or sex, a favourable economic profile if used as
a decision support tool, and with non-inferior fidelity in downstream patient
survival prediction. Future work should iterate upon and integrate such tools
to enhance patient care.