Feeling signs: motor encoding enhances sign language learning in hearing adults

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Studies in Second Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1017/s0272263124000196
Laura M. Morett, Mathew Cieśla, Mary E. Bray, Karen Emmorey
{"title":"Feeling signs: motor encoding enhances sign language learning in hearing adults","authors":"Laura M. Morett, Mathew Cieśla, Mary E. Bray, Karen Emmorey","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Manual production enhances learning and recall of signs by hearing second language learners; however, the mechanisms enabling this effect are unclear. We examined whether the motor encoding (somatosensory feedback) that occurs during sign production benefits learning and whether it interacts with sign iconicity, which also enhances learning. American Sign Language (ASL) signs varying in iconicity were learned either via production (repetition) with the eyes closed or via observation without production. Signs learned via production were recalled more accurately than signs learned via observation, indicating that motor encoding from manual production enriches the representations of signs. Moreover, the effect of motor encoding interacted with iconicity, suggesting that motor encoding may particularly enhance the recall of signs low in iconicity. Together, these results reveal the importance of somatosensory feedback as a key mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of production on sign learning, demonstrating that feeling one’s own signing promotes learning and recall of signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual production enhances learning and recall of signs by hearing second language learners; however, the mechanisms enabling this effect are unclear. We examined whether the motor encoding (somatosensory feedback) that occurs during sign production benefits learning and whether it interacts with sign iconicity, which also enhances learning. American Sign Language (ASL) signs varying in iconicity were learned either via production (repetition) with the eyes closed or via observation without production. Signs learned via production were recalled more accurately than signs learned via observation, indicating that motor encoding from manual production enriches the representations of signs. Moreover, the effect of motor encoding interacted with iconicity, suggesting that motor encoding may particularly enhance the recall of signs low in iconicity. Together, these results reveal the importance of somatosensory feedback as a key mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of production on sign learning, demonstrating that feeling one’s own signing promotes learning and recall of signs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感受手语:运动编码可促进听力成年人的手语学习
手动制作能增强听力第二语言学习者对手势的学习和记忆;然而,产生这种效果的机制尚不清楚。我们研究了手语制作过程中发生的运动编码(体感反馈)是否有利于学习,以及它是否与同样能促进学习的手语标志性相互作用。美国手语(American Sign Language,ASL)中不同标志性的手语是通过闭眼制作(重复)或不制作而通过观察来学习的。通过制作学习到的手语比通过观察学习到的手语更能被准确地回忆起来,这表明通过手动制作进行运动编码能丰富手语的表征。此外,运动编码的效果与标志性相互影响,表明运动编码尤其能增强对标志性较低的标志的回忆。总之,这些结果揭示了体感反馈作为制作对符号学习有利影响的关键机制的重要性,证明了感受自己的手势能促进符号的学习和回忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Acquisition is a refereed journal of international scope devoted to the scientific discussion of acquisition or use of non-native and heritage languages. Each volume (five issues) contains research articles of either a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods nature in addition to essays on current theoretical matters. Other rubrics include shorter articles such as Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports.
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian approach to (re)examining learning effects of cognitive linguistics–inspired instruction: A close replication of Wong, Zhao, and MacWhinney (2018) Validation crisitunity: A response to Al-Hoorie, Hiver, and In’nami (2024) Do they like me?: Exploring the role of metaperception in L1–L2 speaker interaction Learning without awareness revisited and reconsidered: A conceptual replication and extension Exploring the roles of ideal L2 writing self, growth L2 writing mindset, and L2 writing grit in L2 writing achievement among EFL learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1