Siti Nazihahasma Hassan, Abdul Aziz Mohamed Yusoff, Zamzuri Idris, Norhanani Mohd Redzwan, Farizan Ahmad
{"title":"A preliminary study on the impact of nutrient stress induction on drug cytotoxicity in glioblastoma cells and fibroblasts","authors":"Siti Nazihahasma Hassan, Abdul Aziz Mohamed Yusoff, Zamzuri Idris, Norhanani Mohd Redzwan, Farizan Ahmad","doi":"10.1186/s43094-024-00637-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nutrient stress (NS), one of the hallmarks of the tumour microenvironment, can render cancer cells tolerant to cytotoxicity. Fibroblasts, on the other hand, have cancer cell-like traits, such as plasticity and resiliency. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the drug on reseeded human U87 glioblastoma (GBM) cells as well as on mouse L929 fibroblasts in the form of monolayer and colonies that grew after NS induction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>No treatment for 48 h showed a statistically significant difference in U87 cell viability when compared to the 50% hypothetical value. However, temozolomide (TMZ) (151.0 µg/ml) and azithromycin (AZI) (92.0 µg/ml) significantly diminished the number of U87 cell colonies compared to the untreated control, and AZI also outperformed doxycycline (DOXY) (147.0 µg/ml). L929 fibroblasts survived NS, but the cytotoxicity of AZI, DOXY, and AZI + DOXY (92.0 + 147.0 µg/ml) substantially increased than in L929 fibroblasts without NS induction.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present findings suggest that NS does not inevitably contribute to cytotoxic drug tolerance in GBM cells. In addition, although fibroblasts can withstand NS, they can also become susceptible to cytotoxic drug-induced death; nevertheless, the type of drug may play a role.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><img></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-024-00637-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-024-00637-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nutrient stress (NS), one of the hallmarks of the tumour microenvironment, can render cancer cells tolerant to cytotoxicity. Fibroblasts, on the other hand, have cancer cell-like traits, such as plasticity and resiliency. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the drug on reseeded human U87 glioblastoma (GBM) cells as well as on mouse L929 fibroblasts in the form of monolayer and colonies that grew after NS induction.
Results
No treatment for 48 h showed a statistically significant difference in U87 cell viability when compared to the 50% hypothetical value. However, temozolomide (TMZ) (151.0 µg/ml) and azithromycin (AZI) (92.0 µg/ml) significantly diminished the number of U87 cell colonies compared to the untreated control, and AZI also outperformed doxycycline (DOXY) (147.0 µg/ml). L929 fibroblasts survived NS, but the cytotoxicity of AZI, DOXY, and AZI + DOXY (92.0 + 147.0 µg/ml) substantially increased than in L929 fibroblasts without NS induction.
Conclusions
The present findings suggest that NS does not inevitably contribute to cytotoxic drug tolerance in GBM cells. In addition, although fibroblasts can withstand NS, they can also become susceptible to cytotoxic drug-induced death; nevertheless, the type of drug may play a role.
期刊介绍:
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.