Cognitive control circuit function predicts antidepressant outcomes: A signal detection approach to actionable clinical decisions

Leanne M. Williams , Jerome Yesavage
{"title":"Cognitive control circuit function predicts antidepressant outcomes: A signal detection approach to actionable clinical decisions","authors":"Leanne M. Williams ,&nbsp;Jerome Yesavage","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We previously identified a cognitive biotype of depression characterized by dysfunction of the brain’s cognitive control circuit, comprising the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We evaluate these circuit metrics as personalized predictors of antidepressant remission.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We undertook a secondary analysis of data from the international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) for 159 patients who completed fMRI during a GoNoGo task, 8 weeks treatment with one of three study antidepressants and who were assessed for remission status (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≤ 7). Circuit predictors of remission were dLPFC and dACC activity and connectivity quantified in standard deviations. Using established software implementing receiver operating analysis (ROC) we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these predictors at every cut-point for every circuit measure. We calculated number needed to treat (NNT) metrics for the ROC model identifying optimal cut-point values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ROC models identified maximum separation of remitters (62.5%) from non-remitters (21.2%) at an initial cut-point of −0.75 standard deviations for dLPFC activity and averaged circuit metrics at secondary cutpoints. The NNT was 3.72, implying that if 4 patients (rounding of 3.72) were randomly selected, one would be likely to remit, but if circuit metrics informed treatment, two would be likely to remit.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings contribute to identifying clinically actionable circuit measures for clinical trials and clinical practice. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and expand the assessment of longer-term outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We previously identified a cognitive biotype of depression characterized by dysfunction of the brain’s cognitive control circuit, comprising the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We evaluate these circuit metrics as personalized predictors of antidepressant remission.

Methods

We undertook a secondary analysis of data from the international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) for 159 patients who completed fMRI during a GoNoGo task, 8 weeks treatment with one of three study antidepressants and who were assessed for remission status (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≤ 7). Circuit predictors of remission were dLPFC and dACC activity and connectivity quantified in standard deviations. Using established software implementing receiver operating analysis (ROC) we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these predictors at every cut-point for every circuit measure. We calculated number needed to treat (NNT) metrics for the ROC model identifying optimal cut-point values.

Results

ROC models identified maximum separation of remitters (62.5%) from non-remitters (21.2%) at an initial cut-point of −0.75 standard deviations for dLPFC activity and averaged circuit metrics at secondary cutpoints. The NNT was 3.72, implying that if 4 patients (rounding of 3.72) were randomly selected, one would be likely to remit, but if circuit metrics informed treatment, two would be likely to remit.

Conclusions

Our findings contribute to identifying clinically actionable circuit measures for clinical trials and clinical practice. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and expand the assessment of longer-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知控制回路功能可预测抗抑郁治疗效果:可操作临床决策的信号检测方法
背景我们之前通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)发现了一种抑郁症认知生物型,其特征是大脑认知控制回路功能障碍,该回路由背外侧前额叶皮层(dLPFC)和背侧前扣带回皮层(dACC)组成。我们对 "预测抑郁症优化治疗国际研究"(iSPOT-D)的数据进行了二次分析,这些数据来自159名患者,他们在GoNoGo任务中完成了fMRI,接受了8周三种研究抗抑郁药中一种的治疗,并被评估为缓解状态(汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分≤7分)。缓解的回路预测因子是以标准偏差量化的 dLPFC 和 dACC 活动和连通性。我们使用成熟的接收器操作分析(ROC)软件,计算了这些预测指标在每个切点对每个回路测量的敏感性和特异性。结果ROC模型确定了在dLPFC活动的初始切点-0.75标准差和次级切点的平均回路指标时,缓解者(62.5%)与非缓解者(21.2%)的最大分离率。NNT为3.72,这意味着如果随机选择4名患者(3.72的四舍五入),其中1名患者的病情有可能得到缓解,但如果以回路指标作为治疗依据,则有2名患者的病情有可能得到缓解。未来的研究需要复制这些发现,并扩大对长期结果的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1