{"title":"Large-scale knowledge graph representations of disease processes","authors":"Matti Hoch , Shailendra Gupta , Olaf Wolkenhauer","doi":"10.1016/j.coisb.2024.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Today, a wide range of technologies and data types are available when studying disease-relevant processes. Therefore, a major challenge is integrating data from different technologies covering different levels of functional cellular organization. This motivates approaches that start with a bird's-eye perspective, initially considering as many molecules, cell types, and cellular functions as possible. Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide such a perspective through graphically structured representations of the functional connections between biological entities. However, linking KGs of disease processes with experimental or clinical data requires their curation in a large-scale, multi-level layout. The resulting heterogeneity leads to new challenges in KG curation, data integration, and analysis. Existing approaches for small-scale applications must be adapted or combined into multi-scale tools to analyze multi-omics data in KGs. This short review reflects upon the large-scale KG approach to studying disease processes. We do not review all modeling approaches but focus on a personal perspective on.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37400,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310024000131/pdfft?md5=612c0970fb95e722075e70945bafea7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2452310024000131-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310024000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Today, a wide range of technologies and data types are available when studying disease-relevant processes. Therefore, a major challenge is integrating data from different technologies covering different levels of functional cellular organization. This motivates approaches that start with a bird's-eye perspective, initially considering as many molecules, cell types, and cellular functions as possible. Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide such a perspective through graphically structured representations of the functional connections between biological entities. However, linking KGs of disease processes with experimental or clinical data requires their curation in a large-scale, multi-level layout. The resulting heterogeneity leads to new challenges in KG curation, data integration, and analysis. Existing approaches for small-scale applications must be adapted or combined into multi-scale tools to analyze multi-omics data in KGs. This short review reflects upon the large-scale KG approach to studying disease processes. We do not review all modeling approaches but focus on a personal perspective on.
如今,在研究疾病相关过程时,有多种技术和数据类型可供选择。因此,一个主要的挑战是整合来自不同技术、涵盖不同功能细胞组织水平的数据。这就需要从鸟瞰角度出发,首先考虑尽可能多的分子、细胞类型和细胞功能。知识图谱(KG)通过对生物实体之间功能联系的图形化结构表示,提供了这样一种视角。然而,要将疾病过程的知识图谱与实验或临床数据联系起来,就需要以大规模、多层次的布局对其进行整理。由此产生的异质性给 KG 整理、数据整合和分析带来了新的挑战。现有的小规模应用方法必须加以调整或组合成多尺度工具,以分析 KG 中的多组学数据。这篇简短的综述反映了研究疾病过程的大规模 KG 方法。我们并不回顾所有建模方法,而是着重从个人角度探讨以下问题。
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Systems Biology is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up-to-date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Systems Biology. It publishes polished, concise and timely systematic reviews and opinion articles. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion on the topics discussed. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following areas will be covered by Current Opinion in Systems Biology: -Genomics and Epigenomics -Gene Regulation -Metabolic Networks -Cancer and Systemic Diseases -Mathematical Modelling -Big Data Acquisition and Analysis -Systems Pharmacology and Physiology -Synthetic Biology -Stem Cells, Development, and Differentiation -Systems Biology of Mold Organisms -Systems Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interaction -Systems Ecology and Evolution