A new era of genetic diversity conservation through novel tools and accessible data

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1002/fee.2740
Margaret E Hunter, Jessica M da Silva, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Sean M Hoban
{"title":"A new era of genetic diversity conservation through novel tools and accessible data","authors":"Margaret E Hunter,&nbsp;Jessica M da Silva,&nbsp;Alicia Mastretta-Yanes,&nbsp;Sean M Hoban","doi":"10.1002/fee.2740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to increasing alarm over lost diversity, the past few years have seen quantum leaps in making genetics more accessible and relevant for use in practice and policy. A historic advance for conservation was made at the 2022 United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity COP15, when genetic diversity was protected for <i>all</i> species—not just socioeconomically and culturally valuable ones—in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Here, we highlight new, affordable, and inclusive tools for measuring genetic diversity and emphasize the importance of their use to benefit nature and society.</p><p>Improved application of genetic diversity data to conservation and management first requires documenting change across space and time. Meta-analyses have shown substantial genetic losses—incurred during the past century—in many species, especially those endemic to islands or that are heavily harvested (eg commercial fisheries). Genomic patterns across thousands of DNA nucleotides (eg runs of homozygosity) can now provide deeper insight into demographic histories, inbreeding, and the effects of natural selection. New models such as the mutations–area relationship can quantify the effects of habitat loss on genetic diversity at the population level, thereby helping to approximate the impacts of both threats and management (including restoration) activities.</p><p>Meanwhile, Genetic Composition Essential Biodiversity Variables were developed to standardize the reporting of genetic diversity and to facilitate comparisons across studies (<i>Biol Rev</i> 2022; doi.org/10.1111/brv.12852). FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) have also been embraced to enable better comparisons across species and regions and to allow for more transparent and rigorous conclusions. Major efforts have focused on compiling, aggregating, and creating detailed metadata for thousands of previously produced genetic datasets. Through such efforts, an entirely new discipline—<i>macrogenetics</i>, which involves analyzing thousands of datasets to identify ecological drivers of genetic change in space and time—has arisen. Macrogenetics can empower systematic conservation planning, while also enabling the comparison of global genetic diversity maps to species-richness maps (<i>Nat Rev Genet</i> 2021; doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00394-0).</p><p>Even as genetic data become more available, &gt;99% of described species have yet to be studied genetically. Consequently, scalable and affordable non-DNA–based indicators were built on core evolutionary principles (eg maintaining sufficiently large distinct populations to prevent genetic erosion) and adopted by the GBF. These indicators enable rapid estimation of genetic diversity for more inclusive assessment and conservation action at large scales, including within developing and megadiverse countries (<i>Conserv Lett</i> 2023; doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953). Inclusivity is an important emphasis for the field of conservation genetics, with CARE principles (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) adopted/adhered to during the collection, analysis, storage, and interpretation of genetic data, and linkage to other biodiversity information (eg occurrence data in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility).</p><p>For decades, analyses of DNA sequences have helped guide ecological restoration, assess population resilience, and track processes like inbreeding or hybridization to address applied management questions. Formalized genetic monitoring programs at regional or national levels can be used to repeatedly and systematically assess populations through time to detect deleterious changes in genetic diversity that may require urgent protections. Genetic monitoring across species and ecosystems has identified areas undergoing rapid habitat loss or climate change—for example, by highlighting the importance of niche margins to protect unique genetic diversity (<i>Nat Ecol Evol</i> 2024; doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02260-0).</p><p>Moving forward, genetic diversity assessments are likely to include more remote data collection, like environmental DNA (eDNA), to infer species’ presence through the analysis of DNA shed into the environment (for example, in water, soil, or air). The field of eDNA is experiencing rapid technological advances that include abundance estimations and the sequencing of genetic diversity within populations. Simultaneously, high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning can be used to estimate genetic diversity and population differentiation, without the need to physically sample DNA.</p><p>We have entered a new era of transparent and inclusive analysis of the world's genetic diversity with advancements in macrogenetics, proxy-based tools, FAIR and CARE standards, and novel technologies. Uptake of new approaches can be amplified by collaborating through regional and global initiatives, such as the Coalition for Conservation Genetics (<i>Conserv Sci Pract</i> 2022; doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12635). Additional resources, along with new legal frameworks, tools, and policies, can help to advance the contributions of genetics in applied ecology and biodiversity conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2740","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to increasing alarm over lost diversity, the past few years have seen quantum leaps in making genetics more accessible and relevant for use in practice and policy. A historic advance for conservation was made at the 2022 United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity COP15, when genetic diversity was protected for all species—not just socioeconomically and culturally valuable ones—in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Here, we highlight new, affordable, and inclusive tools for measuring genetic diversity and emphasize the importance of their use to benefit nature and society.

Improved application of genetic diversity data to conservation and management first requires documenting change across space and time. Meta-analyses have shown substantial genetic losses—incurred during the past century—in many species, especially those endemic to islands or that are heavily harvested (eg commercial fisheries). Genomic patterns across thousands of DNA nucleotides (eg runs of homozygosity) can now provide deeper insight into demographic histories, inbreeding, and the effects of natural selection. New models such as the mutations–area relationship can quantify the effects of habitat loss on genetic diversity at the population level, thereby helping to approximate the impacts of both threats and management (including restoration) activities.

Meanwhile, Genetic Composition Essential Biodiversity Variables were developed to standardize the reporting of genetic diversity and to facilitate comparisons across studies (Biol Rev 2022; doi.org/10.1111/brv.12852). FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) have also been embraced to enable better comparisons across species and regions and to allow for more transparent and rigorous conclusions. Major efforts have focused on compiling, aggregating, and creating detailed metadata for thousands of previously produced genetic datasets. Through such efforts, an entirely new discipline—macrogenetics, which involves analyzing thousands of datasets to identify ecological drivers of genetic change in space and time—has arisen. Macrogenetics can empower systematic conservation planning, while also enabling the comparison of global genetic diversity maps to species-richness maps (Nat Rev Genet 2021; doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00394-0).

Even as genetic data become more available, >99% of described species have yet to be studied genetically. Consequently, scalable and affordable non-DNA–based indicators were built on core evolutionary principles (eg maintaining sufficiently large distinct populations to prevent genetic erosion) and adopted by the GBF. These indicators enable rapid estimation of genetic diversity for more inclusive assessment and conservation action at large scales, including within developing and megadiverse countries (Conserv Lett 2023; doi.org/10.1111/conl.12953). Inclusivity is an important emphasis for the field of conservation genetics, with CARE principles (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) adopted/adhered to during the collection, analysis, storage, and interpretation of genetic data, and linkage to other biodiversity information (eg occurrence data in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility).

For decades, analyses of DNA sequences have helped guide ecological restoration, assess population resilience, and track processes like inbreeding or hybridization to address applied management questions. Formalized genetic monitoring programs at regional or national levels can be used to repeatedly and systematically assess populations through time to detect deleterious changes in genetic diversity that may require urgent protections. Genetic monitoring across species and ecosystems has identified areas undergoing rapid habitat loss or climate change—for example, by highlighting the importance of niche margins to protect unique genetic diversity (Nat Ecol Evol 2024; doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02260-0).

Moving forward, genetic diversity assessments are likely to include more remote data collection, like environmental DNA (eDNA), to infer species’ presence through the analysis of DNA shed into the environment (for example, in water, soil, or air). The field of eDNA is experiencing rapid technological advances that include abundance estimations and the sequencing of genetic diversity within populations. Simultaneously, high-resolution satellite imagery and deep learning can be used to estimate genetic diversity and population differentiation, without the need to physically sample DNA.

We have entered a new era of transparent and inclusive analysis of the world's genetic diversity with advancements in macrogenetics, proxy-based tools, FAIR and CARE standards, and novel technologies. Uptake of new approaches can be amplified by collaborating through regional and global initiatives, such as the Coalition for Conservation Genetics (Conserv Sci Pract 2022; doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12635). Additional resources, along with new legal frameworks, tools, and policies, can help to advance the contributions of genetics in applied ecology and biodiversity conservation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过新工具和可获取数据开创遗传多样性保护新纪元
更多的资源以及新的法律框架、工具和政策有助于推动遗传学在应用生态学和生物多样性保护方面的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Bone gnawing in a Japanese squirrel Deoxygenation—coming to a water body near you Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1