A historical narrative review through the field of tocolysis in threatened preterm birth

Tijn van Winden , Carolien Roos , Ben W. Mol , E. Pajkrt , Martijn A. Oudijk
{"title":"A historical narrative review through the field of tocolysis in threatened preterm birth","authors":"Tijn van Winden ,&nbsp;Carolien Roos ,&nbsp;Ben W. Mol ,&nbsp;E. Pajkrt ,&nbsp;Martijn A. Oudijk","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preterm birth presents a significant challenge in clinical obstetrics, requiring effective strategies to reduce associated mortality and morbidity risks. Tocolytic drugs, aimed at inhibiting uterine contractions, are a key aspect of addressing this challenge. Despite extensive research over many years, determining the most effective tocolytic agents remains a complex task, prompting better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of spontaneous preterm birth and recording meaningful outcome measures. This paper provides a comprehensive review of various obsolete and current tocolytic drug regimens that were instituted over the past century, examining both historical contexts and contemporary challenges in their development and adoption. The examination of historical debates and advancements highlights the complexity of introducing new therapies. While the search for effective tocolytics continues, questions arise regarding their actual benefits in obstetric care and the necessity for ongoing exploration. The presence of methodological limitations in current research emphasizes the importance of well-designed randomized controlled trials with robust endpoints and extended follow-up periods.In response to these complexities, the consideration of shifting towards prevention strategies aimed at addressing the root causes of preterm labor becomes more and more evident. This potential shift may offer a more effective approach than relying solely on tocolytics to delay labor initiation.Ultimately, effectively managing threatened preterm birth necessitates ongoing investigation, innovation, and a willingness to reassess strategies in pursuit of optimal outcomes for mothers, neonates, and long-term child health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000334/pdfft?md5=a89fed44464c6af42ed47bc4fc0d3b51&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000334-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preterm birth presents a significant challenge in clinical obstetrics, requiring effective strategies to reduce associated mortality and morbidity risks. Tocolytic drugs, aimed at inhibiting uterine contractions, are a key aspect of addressing this challenge. Despite extensive research over many years, determining the most effective tocolytic agents remains a complex task, prompting better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of spontaneous preterm birth and recording meaningful outcome measures. This paper provides a comprehensive review of various obsolete and current tocolytic drug regimens that were instituted over the past century, examining both historical contexts and contemporary challenges in their development and adoption. The examination of historical debates and advancements highlights the complexity of introducing new therapies. While the search for effective tocolytics continues, questions arise regarding their actual benefits in obstetric care and the necessity for ongoing exploration. The presence of methodological limitations in current research emphasizes the importance of well-designed randomized controlled trials with robust endpoints and extended follow-up periods.In response to these complexities, the consideration of shifting towards prevention strategies aimed at addressing the root causes of preterm labor becomes more and more evident. This potential shift may offer a more effective approach than relying solely on tocolytics to delay labor initiation.Ultimately, effectively managing threatened preterm birth necessitates ongoing investigation, innovation, and a willingness to reassess strategies in pursuit of optimal outcomes for mothers, neonates, and long-term child health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿溶血疗法的历史回顾
早产是临床产科的一项重大挑战,需要采取有效的策略来降低相关的死亡率和发病率风险。旨在抑制子宫收缩的催产药物是应对这一挑战的关键环节。尽管经过多年的广泛研究,但确定最有效的催产药物仍是一项复杂的任务,这促使人们更好地了解自发性早产的潜在机制,并记录有意义的结果测量。本文全面回顾了过去一个世纪中采用的各种过时和现行的促溶血药物疗法,研究了这些疗法的历史背景以及在开发和采用过程中遇到的当代挑战。对历史上的争论和进展的研究凸显了引入新疗法的复杂性。在继续寻找有效溶解剂的同时,人们也对其在产科护理中的实际益处提出了质疑,并认为有必要对其进行持续探索。目前的研究存在方法上的局限性,这强调了设计良好的随机对照试验的重要性,这些试验应具有可靠的终点和较长的随访期。针对这些复杂性,越来越多的人开始考虑转向旨在解决早产根源的预防策略。这种潜在的转变可能会提供一种比单纯依赖催产药来推迟分娩开始时间更有效的方法。最终,要有效控制濒临早产的威胁,就必须不断调查、创新,并愿意重新评估各种策略,以追求对母亲、新生儿和儿童长期健康的最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate (PETN) for prevention of fetal growth restriction in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Recurrent pain after laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: Clinical features and long-term follow up The Association and diagnostic value between Maternal Serum Placental Markers and Placenta Previa Cervical cerclage vs cervical pessary in women with cervical insufficiency: A multicentric, open-label, randomised, controlled pilot trial [the CEPEIC trial] Vegetarian diet and pregnancy outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1