Predicting influenza-like illness trends based on sentinel surveillance data in China from 2011 to 2019: A modelling and comparative study1

IF 8.8 3区 医学 Q1 Medicine Infectious Disease Modelling Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.idm.2024.04.010
Xingxing Zhang , Liuyang Yang , Teng Chen , Qing Wang , Jin Yang , Ting Zhang , Jiao Yang , Hongqing Zhao , Shengjie Lai , Luzhao Feng , Weizhong Yang
{"title":"Predicting influenza-like illness trends based on sentinel surveillance data in China from 2011 to 2019: A modelling and comparative study1","authors":"Xingxing Zhang ,&nbsp;Liuyang Yang ,&nbsp;Teng Chen ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiao Yang ,&nbsp;Hongqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Shengjie Lai ,&nbsp;Luzhao Feng ,&nbsp;Weizhong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.idm.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Influenza is an acute respiratory infectious disease with a significant global disease burden. Additionally, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and its related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have introduced uncertainty to the spread of influenza. However, comparative studies on the performance of innovative models and approaches used for influenza prediction are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the trend of influenza-like illness (ILI) in settings with diverse climate characteristics in China based on sentinel surveillance data using three approaches and evaluate and compare their predictive performance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The generalized additive model (GAM), deep learning hybrid model based on Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU), and autoregressive moving average-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARMA—GARCH) model were established to predict the trends of ILI 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week-ahead in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi, Hubei, Chongqing, Guangdong, Hainan, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in China, based on sentinel surveillance data from 2011 to 2019. Three relevant metrics, namely, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and R squared, were calculated to evaluate and compare the goodness of fit and robustness of the three models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Considering the MAPE, RMSE, and R squared values, the ARMA—GARCH model performed best, while the GRU-based deep learning hybrid model exhibited moderate performance and GAM made predictions with the least accuracy in the eight settings in China. Additionally, the models’ predictive performance declined as the weeks ahead increased. Furthermore, blocked cross-validation indicated that all models were robust to changes in data and had low risks of overfitting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggested that the ARMA—GARCH model exhibited the best accuracy in predicting ILI trends in China compared to the GAM and GRU-based deep learning hybrid model. Therefore, in the future, the ARMA—GARCH model may be used to predict ILI trends in public health practice across diverse climatic zones, thereby contributing to influenza control and prevention efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36831,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042724000642/pdfft?md5=7be190d3baa9e1f1f010c2c653af27b2&pid=1-s2.0-S2468042724000642-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468042724000642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Influenza is an acute respiratory infectious disease with a significant global disease burden. Additionally, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and its related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have introduced uncertainty to the spread of influenza. However, comparative studies on the performance of innovative models and approaches used for influenza prediction are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the trend of influenza-like illness (ILI) in settings with diverse climate characteristics in China based on sentinel surveillance data using three approaches and evaluate and compare their predictive performance.

Methods

The generalized additive model (GAM), deep learning hybrid model based on Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU), and autoregressive moving average-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARMA—GARCH) model were established to predict the trends of ILI 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week-ahead in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi, Hubei, Chongqing, Guangdong, Hainan, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in China, based on sentinel surveillance data from 2011 to 2019. Three relevant metrics, namely, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and R squared, were calculated to evaluate and compare the goodness of fit and robustness of the three models.

Results

Considering the MAPE, RMSE, and R squared values, the ARMA—GARCH model performed best, while the GRU-based deep learning hybrid model exhibited moderate performance and GAM made predictions with the least accuracy in the eight settings in China. Additionally, the models’ predictive performance declined as the weeks ahead increased. Furthermore, blocked cross-validation indicated that all models were robust to changes in data and had low risks of overfitting.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that the ARMA—GARCH model exhibited the best accuracy in predicting ILI trends in China compared to the GAM and GRU-based deep learning hybrid model. Therefore, in the future, the ARMA—GARCH model may be used to predict ILI trends in public health practice across diverse climatic zones, thereby contributing to influenza control and prevention efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于哨点监测数据预测 2011 至 2019 年中国流感样病例趋势:建模与比较研究1
背景流感是一种急性呼吸道传染病,给全球带来了沉重的疾病负担。此外,2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行及其相关的非药物干预措施(NPIs)也给流感的传播带来了不确定性。然而,对用于流感预测的创新模型和方法的性能进行的比较研究十分有限。因此,本研究旨在基于哨点监测数据,使用三种方法预测中国不同气候特征环境下流感样病例(ILI)的趋势,并评估和比较它们的预测性能。方法基于2011-2019年哨点监测数据,建立广义加性模型(GAM)、基于门递归单元(GRU)的深度学习混合模型和自回归移动平均-广义自回归条件异方差(ARMA-GARCH)模型,预测中国北京、天津、山西、湖北、重庆、广东、海南和香港特别行政区提前1周、2周、3周和4周的ILI趋势。计算了三个相关指标,即平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和R平方,以评估和比较三个模型的拟合度和鲁棒性。结果考虑到MAPE、RMSE和R平方值,ARMA-GARCH模型在中国的八个环境中表现最佳,而基于GRU的深度学习混合模型表现中等,GAM预测的准确性最低。此外,模型的预测性能随着未来周数的增加而下降。结论我们的研究表明,与 GAM 和基于 GRU 的深度学习混合模型相比,ARMA-GARCH 模型在预测中国 ILI 趋势方面表现出最佳的准确性。因此,ARMA-GARCH 模型未来可用于预测不同气候区公共卫生实践中的 ILI 趋势,从而为流感防控工作做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Modelling
Infectious Disease Modelling Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
73
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Disease Modelling is an open access journal that undergoes peer-review. Its main objective is to facilitate research that combines mathematical modelling, retrieval and analysis of infection disease data, and public health decision support. The journal actively encourages original research that improves this interface, as well as review articles that highlight innovative methodologies relevant to data collection, informatics, and policy making in the field of public health.
期刊最新文献
Application of multiple linear regression model and long short-term memory with compartmental model to forecast dengue cases in Selangor, Malaysia based on climate variables Network-based virus dynamic simulation: Evaluating the fomite disinfection effectiveness on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in indoor environment Dynamics of an SVEIR transmission model with protection awareness and two strains A tentative exploration for the association between influenza virus infection and SARS-CoV-2 infection in Shihezi, China: A test-negative study Modelling and investigating memory immune responses in infectious disease. Application to influenza a virus and sars-cov-2 reinfections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1