Inclusive classroom norms and children's expectations of inclusion of peers with learning difficulties in their social world

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101312
Carmen Barth , Jeanine Grütter
{"title":"Inclusive classroom norms and children's expectations of inclusion of peers with learning difficulties in their social world","authors":"Carmen Barth ,&nbsp;Jeanine Grütter","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined whether inclusive classroom norms predicted children's reasoning and expectations about the inclusion of peers with learning difficulties from different perspectives (i.e., self, friends, and unfamiliar story protagonist). Swiss elementary school children (<em>N</em> = 1019; 51% girls; <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 10.20 years; Grades 3–6) shared their perceptions of inclusive classroom norms and answered questions regarding the inclusion of a character with learning difficulties in an academic scenario. Multilevel analyses revealed that children expected less inclusion from their friends (estimated <em>OR</em> = 0.14, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) or the unfamiliar story protagonist (estimated <em>OR</em> = 0.15, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) than from themselves. Inclusive classroom norms positively predicted children's own (estimated <em>OR</em> = 3.17, <em>p</em> = .041) and their friends' inclusion expectations (estimated <em>OR</em> = 4.59, <em>p</em> = .007). Moreover, individuals who perceived higher inclusive norms than the classroom average were less concerned that the inclusion of the child with learning difficulties would threaten successful group functioning (γ = − 0.19, <em>p</em> = .011). To target the inclusion of children with learning difficulties, school psychologists can heighten classmates' perceptions of inclusive norms and pay attention to individual differences in norm perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000323/pdfft?md5=ded92d4a5286a65b65adf35dbbdb3ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0022440524000323-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined whether inclusive classroom norms predicted children's reasoning and expectations about the inclusion of peers with learning difficulties from different perspectives (i.e., self, friends, and unfamiliar story protagonist). Swiss elementary school children (N = 1019; 51% girls; Mage = 10.20 years; Grades 3–6) shared their perceptions of inclusive classroom norms and answered questions regarding the inclusion of a character with learning difficulties in an academic scenario. Multilevel analyses revealed that children expected less inclusion from their friends (estimated OR = 0.14, p < .001) or the unfamiliar story protagonist (estimated OR = 0.15, p < .001) than from themselves. Inclusive classroom norms positively predicted children's own (estimated OR = 3.17, p = .041) and their friends' inclusion expectations (estimated OR = 4.59, p = .007). Moreover, individuals who perceived higher inclusive norms than the classroom average were less concerned that the inclusion of the child with learning difficulties would threaten successful group functioning (γ = − 0.19, p = .011). To target the inclusion of children with learning difficulties, school psychologists can heighten classmates' perceptions of inclusive norms and pay attention to individual differences in norm perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全纳课堂规范和儿童对在其社交世界中包容有学习困难的同伴的期望
我们研究了全纳课堂规范是否能预测儿童从不同角度(即自己、朋友和陌生的故事主人公)对有学习困难的同伴的包容的推理和期望。瑞士小学生(人数 = 1019;51% 为女生;年龄 = 10.20 岁;3-6 年级)分享了他们对全纳课堂规范的看法,并回答了有关在学习情景中包容有学习困难的角色的问题。多层次分析表明,孩子们对朋友(估计 OR = 0.14,p < .001)或陌生故事主人公(估计 OR = 0.15,p < .001)的全纳期望低于对自己的期望。全纳课堂规范对儿童自己(估计 OR = 3.17,p = .041)及其朋友的全纳期望(估计 OR = 4.59,p = .007)有积极的预测作用。此外,认为全纳规范高于班级平均水平的人,不太担心学习困难儿童的融入会威胁到小组的成功运作(γ = - 0.19,p = .011)。为了有针对性地接纳有学习困难的儿童,学校心理学家可以提高同学们对全纳规范的感知,并关注规范感知方面的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the treatment utility of the Cognitive Assessment System: A meta-analysis of reading and mathematics outcomes The CARES classroom observation tool: Psychometrics of an observational measure of culturally responsive practices Profiles of principal stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates Emotional intersection: Delineating test anxiety, emotional disorders, and student well-being Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in early childhood special education: Identifying mechanisms of action that explain why it works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1