Impact of neonatal pain and opiate administration in animal models: A meta-analysis concerning pain threshold

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106014
Philipp Steinbauer , Tamara Lisy , Francisco J. Monje , Eva Chwala , Brigitte Wildner , Hannah Schned , Philipp Deindl , Angelika Berger , Vito Giordano , Monika Olischar
{"title":"Impact of neonatal pain and opiate administration in animal models: A meta-analysis concerning pain threshold","authors":"Philipp Steinbauer ,&nbsp;Tamara Lisy ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Monje ,&nbsp;Eva Chwala ,&nbsp;Brigitte Wildner ,&nbsp;Hannah Schned ,&nbsp;Philipp Deindl ,&nbsp;Angelika Berger ,&nbsp;Vito Giordano ,&nbsp;Monika Olischar","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><p>Neonatal intensive care treatment, including frequently performed painful procedures and administration of analgesic drugs, can have different effects on the neurodevelopment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the influence of pain, opiate administration, and pre-emptive opiate administration on pain threshold in animal studies in rodents, which had a brain development corresponding to preterm and term infants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search of electronic data bases including CENTRAL (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase.com, Medline (OVID), Web of Science, and PsycInfo (OVID) was conducted. A total of 42 studies examining the effect of pain (n = 38), opiate administration (n = 9), and opiate administration prior to a painful event (n = 5) in rodents were included in this analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results revealed that pain (g = 0.42, 95%CI 0.16–0.67, <em>p</em> = 0.001) increased pain threshold leading to hypoalgesia. Pre-emptive opiate administration had the opposite effect, lowering pain threshold, when compared to pain without prior treatment (g = −1.79, 95%CI −2.71–0.86, <em>p</em> = 0.0001).</p><p>Differences were found in the meta regression for type of stimulus (thermal: g = 0.66, 95%CI 0.26–1.07, <em>p</em> = 0.001; vs. mechanical: g = 0.13, 95%CI −0.98–1.25, <em>p</em> = 0.81) and gestational age (b = −1.85, SE = 0.82, <em>p</em> = 0.027). In addition, meta regression indicated an association between higher pain thresholds and the amount of cumulative pain events (b = 0.06, SE = 0.03, <em>p</em> = 0.05) as well as severity of pain events (b = 0.94, SE = 0.28, <em>p</em> = 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neonatal exposure to pain results in higher pain thresholds. However, caution is warranted in extrapolating these findings directly to premature infants. Further research is warranted to validate similar effects in clinical contexts and inform evidence-based practices in neonatal care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 106014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224000835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim

Neonatal intensive care treatment, including frequently performed painful procedures and administration of analgesic drugs, can have different effects on the neurodevelopment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the influence of pain, opiate administration, and pre-emptive opiate administration on pain threshold in animal studies in rodents, which had a brain development corresponding to preterm and term infants.

Methods

A systematic literature search of electronic data bases including CENTRAL (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase.com, Medline (OVID), Web of Science, and PsycInfo (OVID) was conducted. A total of 42 studies examining the effect of pain (n = 38), opiate administration (n = 9), and opiate administration prior to a painful event (n = 5) in rodents were included in this analysis.

Results

The results revealed that pain (g = 0.42, 95%CI 0.16–0.67, p = 0.001) increased pain threshold leading to hypoalgesia. Pre-emptive opiate administration had the opposite effect, lowering pain threshold, when compared to pain without prior treatment (g = −1.79, 95%CI −2.71–0.86, p = 0.0001).

Differences were found in the meta regression for type of stimulus (thermal: g = 0.66, 95%CI 0.26–1.07, p = 0.001; vs. mechanical: g = 0.13, 95%CI −0.98–1.25, p = 0.81) and gestational age (b = −1.85, SE = 0.82, p = 0.027). In addition, meta regression indicated an association between higher pain thresholds and the amount of cumulative pain events (b = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = 0.05) as well as severity of pain events (b = 0.94, SE = 0.28, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Neonatal exposure to pain results in higher pain thresholds. However, caution is warranted in extrapolating these findings directly to premature infants. Further research is warranted to validate similar effects in clinical contexts and inform evidence-based practices in neonatal care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿疼痛和鸦片制剂对动物模型的影响:关于疼痛阈值的荟萃分析
背景和目的新生儿重症监护治疗,包括经常进行的疼痛程序和镇痛药物的使用,会对神经发育产生不同的影响。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在通过对啮齿类动物的动物实验,研究疼痛、阿片类药物的使用和预先阿片类药物的使用对疼痛阈值的影响,啮齿类动物的大脑发育情况与早产儿和足月儿相似。结果结果显示,疼痛(g = 0.42,95%CI 0.16-0.67,p = 0.001)会提高痛阈值,导致痛觉减退。与未预先治疗的疼痛相比,预先服用阿片类药物具有相反的效果,可降低痛阈值(g = -1.79, 95%CI -2.71-0.86, p = 0.0001)。在刺激类型(热刺激:g = 0.66,95%CI 0.26-1.07,p = 0.001;机械刺激:g = 0.13,95%CI -0.98-1.25,p = 0.81)和胎龄(b = -1.85,SE = 0.82,p = 0.027)的元回归中发现了差异。此外,元回归表明,较高的疼痛阈值与累积疼痛事件的数量(b = 0.06,SE = 0.03,p = 0.05)以及疼痛事件的严重程度(b = 0.94,SE = 0.28,p = 0.001)有关。然而,将这些研究结果直接推断到早产儿身上还需谨慎。需要进一步研究以验证临床环境中的类似效应,并为新生儿护理中的循证实践提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Early pain findings in infants with brachial plexus birth injury: Relationship with function and comorbidities, and cut-off point for fractures Cardiac autonomic regulation as a proxy of early neurodevelopment: A systematic review Implementation of nutritional care bundle is associated with improved growth in preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks Evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal renal microvascular flow characteristics of three-dimensional MV-flow imaging Validity and use of the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1