Preoperative fasting and the risk of pulmonary aspiration—a narrative review of historical concepts, physiological effects, and new perspectives

Anne Rüggeberg , Patrick Meybohm , Eike A. Nickel
{"title":"Preoperative fasting and the risk of pulmonary aspiration—a narrative review of historical concepts, physiological effects, and new perspectives","authors":"Anne Rüggeberg ,&nbsp;Patrick Meybohm ,&nbsp;Eike A. Nickel","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the early days of anaesthesia, the fasting period for liquids was kept short. By the mid-20th century ‘nil by mouth after midnight’ had become routine as the principles of the management of ‘full stomach’ emergencies were extended to include elective healthy patients. Back then, no distinction was made between the withholding of liquids and solids. Towards the end of the last century, recommendations of professional anaesthesiology bodies began to reduce the fasting time of clear liquids to 2 h. This reduction in fasting time was based on the understanding that gastric emptying of clear liquids is rapid, exponential, and proportional to the current filling state of the stomach. Furthermore, there was no evidence of a link between drinking clear liquids and the risk of aspiration. Indeed, most instances of aspiration are caused by failure to identify aspiration risk factors and adjust the anaesthetic technique accordingly. In contrast, long periods of liquid withdrawal cause discomfort and may also lead to serious postoperative complications. Despite this, more than two decades after the introduction of the 2 h limit, patients still fast for a median of up to 12 h before anaesthesia, mainly because of organisational issues. Therefore, some hospitals have decided to allow patients to drink clear liquids within 2 h of induction of anaesthesia. Well-designed clinical trials should investigate whether these concepts are safe in patients scheduled for anaesthesia or procedural sedation, focusing on both aspiration risk and complications of prolonged fasting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000261/pdfft?md5=1835d3a376703ef20b66bf8e87f4e357&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000261-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early days of anaesthesia, the fasting period for liquids was kept short. By the mid-20th century ‘nil by mouth after midnight’ had become routine as the principles of the management of ‘full stomach’ emergencies were extended to include elective healthy patients. Back then, no distinction was made between the withholding of liquids and solids. Towards the end of the last century, recommendations of professional anaesthesiology bodies began to reduce the fasting time of clear liquids to 2 h. This reduction in fasting time was based on the understanding that gastric emptying of clear liquids is rapid, exponential, and proportional to the current filling state of the stomach. Furthermore, there was no evidence of a link between drinking clear liquids and the risk of aspiration. Indeed, most instances of aspiration are caused by failure to identify aspiration risk factors and adjust the anaesthetic technique accordingly. In contrast, long periods of liquid withdrawal cause discomfort and may also lead to serious postoperative complications. Despite this, more than two decades after the introduction of the 2 h limit, patients still fast for a median of up to 12 h before anaesthesia, mainly because of organisational issues. Therefore, some hospitals have decided to allow patients to drink clear liquids within 2 h of induction of anaesthesia. Well-designed clinical trials should investigate whether these concepts are safe in patients scheduled for anaesthesia or procedural sedation, focusing on both aspiration risk and complications of prolonged fasting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前禁食与肺吸入风险--对历史概念、生理效应和新观点的叙述性回顾
在麻醉早期,禁食液体的时间很短。到 20 世纪中期,随着 "饱腹 "急症的处理原则扩展到择期手术的健康患者,"午夜后禁食 "已成为惯例。在当时,并没有区分禁食液体和固体。上世纪末,专业麻醉学机构开始建议将清流液的禁食时间缩短至 2 小时。禁食时间的缩短是基于这样一种认识,即清流液的胃排空是快速的、指数式的,并且与胃的当前充盈状态成正比。此外,没有证据表明饮用透明液体与吸入风险之间存在联系。事实上,大多数吸入事件都是由于未能识别吸入风险因素并相应调整麻醉技术造成的。相反,长时间不喝液体会引起不适,还可能导致严重的术后并发症。尽管如此,在引入 2 小时限制的二十多年后,患者在麻醉前禁食的时间中位数仍长达 12 小时,这主要是由于组织问题。因此,一些医院决定允许患者在麻醉诱导后 2 小时内饮用清水。设计良好的临床试验应研究这些概念对计划进行麻醉或手术镇静的患者是否安全,重点关注吸入风险和长期禁食的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study of a new combined approach for managing preoperative anxiety in patients with breast or gynaecological cancer Perioperative considerations in the paediatric patient with congenital and acquired coagulopathy Evaluation of lung homogeneity in neonates and small infants during general anaesthesia using electrical impedance tomography: a prospective observational study Paediatric perioperative hypersensitivity: the performance of the current consensus formula and the effect of uneventful anaesthesia on serum tryptase. Reply to BJA Open 2024; 9: 100254 An update on iron therapy as an intervention to reduce blood transfusion for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1