Comparative Analysis of Bifacial and Monofacial Floating Solar Power Plants: Performance Evaluation and Economic Analysis

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s40997-024-00771-0
Atul Avasthi, Rachana Garg, Priya Mahajan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Bifacial and Monofacial Floating Solar Power Plants: Performance Evaluation and Economic Analysis","authors":"Atul Avasthi, Rachana Garg, Priya Mahajan","doi":"10.1007/s40997-024-00771-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of a bi-facial floating solar photovoltaic plant (FSPV<sub>B</sub>) and evaluate its technological and economic performance in comparison to an established simulated mono-facial floating solar power plant (FSPV<sub>M</sub>). This study evaluates the practicality of floating solar photovoltaic projects in Water Works, Chandigarh, by assessing a 2 MW grid-connected system with a bi-facial PV configuration. The study involves simulating the outcomes of both FSPV<sub>B</sub> and FSPV<sub>M</sub> plants to identify the most efficient design to achieve maximum power output. The performance parameters, i.e. performance ratio, energy production, levelized cost of energy, and payback period of the floating solar PV plant are evaluated using the PVsyst software. The findings demonstrate that the FSPV<sub>B</sub> plant can produce 2887 MWh of energy per year, with a superior performance ratio of 92.90%. Furthermore, the economic analysis indicates that the FSPV<sub>B</sub> plant had a shorter payback period (PBP) of 8.3 years compared to the FSPV<sub>M</sub> plant with a PBP of 12.7 years. Additionally, the FSPV<sub>B</sub> plant has a lower LCOE than the FSPV<sub>M</sub> plant. Hence, the study suggests that the proposed bi-facial floating solar power plant would be better, technologically, economically, and environmentally.</p>","PeriodicalId":49063,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-024-00771-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of a bi-facial floating solar photovoltaic plant (FSPVB) and evaluate its technological and economic performance in comparison to an established simulated mono-facial floating solar power plant (FSPVM). This study evaluates the practicality of floating solar photovoltaic projects in Water Works, Chandigarh, by assessing a 2 MW grid-connected system with a bi-facial PV configuration. The study involves simulating the outcomes of both FSPVB and FSPVM plants to identify the most efficient design to achieve maximum power output. The performance parameters, i.e. performance ratio, energy production, levelized cost of energy, and payback period of the floating solar PV plant are evaluated using the PVsyst software. The findings demonstrate that the FSPVB plant can produce 2887 MWh of energy per year, with a superior performance ratio of 92.90%. Furthermore, the economic analysis indicates that the FSPVB plant had a shorter payback period (PBP) of 8.3 years compared to the FSPVM plant with a PBP of 12.7 years. Additionally, the FSPVB plant has a lower LCOE than the FSPVM plant. Hence, the study suggests that the proposed bi-facial floating solar power plant would be better, technologically, economically, and environmentally.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双面和单面浮动太阳能发电站的比较分析:性能评估和经济分析
本文旨在介绍双面浮动太阳能光伏电站(FSPVB)的概念,并将其与已建立的模拟单面浮动太阳能电站(FSPVM)进行比较,评估其技术和经济性能。本研究通过评估双面光伏配置的 2 兆瓦并网系统,评估了昌迪加尔水厂浮动太阳能光伏项目的实用性。研究包括模拟 FSPVB 和 FSPVM 电站的结果,以确定实现最大电力输出的最有效设计。使用 PVsyst 软件评估了浮动太阳能光伏电站的性能参数,即性能比、发电量、平准化能源成本和投资回收期。结果表明,FSPVB 电站每年可生产 2887 兆瓦时的电能,性能比高达 92.90%。此外,经济分析表明,与投资回收期为 12.7 年的 FSPVM 电站相比,FSPVB 电站的投资回收期更短,仅为 8.3 年。此外,FSPVB 工厂的 LCOE 低于 FSPVM 工厂。因此,研究表明,拟议的双面浮动式太阳能发电站在技术、经济和环境方面都更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of Mechanical Engineering is to foster the growth of scientific research in all branches of mechanical engineering and its related grounds and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attentionof the world’s scientific communities. The journal has the focus on the frontier topics in the theoretical, mathematical, numerical, experimental and scientific developments in mechanical engineering as well as applications of established techniques to new domains in various mechanical engineering disciplines such as: Solid Mechanics, Kinematics, Dynamics Vibration and Control, Fluids Mechanics, Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer, Energy and Environment, Computational Mechanics, Bio Micro and Nano Mechanics and Design and Materials Engineering & Manufacturing. The editors will welcome papers from all professors and researchers from universities, research centers, organizations, companies and industries from all over the world in the hope that this will advance the scientific standards of the journal and provide a channel of communication between Iranian Scholars and their colleague in other parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Influence of Vibration on Natural Convection in Hybrid Nanofluids via the IB-STLBM Application of Entropy Production Theory for Evaluating the Performance of a Gorlov Hydrokinetic Turbine Analyzing the Influence of Mid-Layer Cracks on the Operational Performance of a Silicon-Substrate Bimorph Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Study of Thermo-Viscoelastic Interactions in Microplates Resting on an Elastic Foundation and Subjected to External Loads Using DPL Thermoelastic Model Numerical Study of the Superhydrophobic Nature of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS): Energy Characteristics of Droplet Impact, Spreading and Rebounding Phenomena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1