Nurturing families: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a whole-family intervention with vulnerable families in Jordan

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.43
Felicity L. Brown, Hind Yousef, Alexandra C.E. Bleile, Hadeel Mansour, Anna Barrett, Maha Ghatasheh, Eve S. Puffer, Zeinab Mansour, Karam Hayef, Samer Kurdi, Qaasim Ali, Wietse A. Tol, Aala El-Khani, Rachel Calam, Hana Abu Hassan, Mark J.D. Jordans
{"title":"Nurturing families: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a whole-family intervention with vulnerable families in Jordan","authors":"Felicity L. Brown, Hind Yousef, Alexandra C.E. Bleile, Hadeel Mansour, Anna Barrett, Maha Ghatasheh, Eve S. Puffer, Zeinab Mansour, Karam Hayef, Samer Kurdi, Qaasim Ali, Wietse A. Tol, Aala El-Khani, Rachel Calam, Hana Abu Hassan, Mark J.D. Jordans","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Armed conflict and forced displacement can significantly strain nurturing family environments, which are essential for child well-being. Yet, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of family-systemic interventions in these contexts. We conducted a two-arm, single-masked, feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (fRCT) of a whole-family intervention with Syrian, Iraqi and Jordanian families in Jordan. We aimed to determine the feasibility of intervention and study procedures to inform a fully-powered RCT. Eligible families were randomised to receive the Nurturing Families intervention or enhanced usual care (1:1). Masked assessors measured outcomes at baseline and endline; primary outcome measures were caregiver psychological distress, family functioning, and parenting practices. Families and implementing staff participated in qualitative interviews at endline. Of the 62 families screened, 60 (98%) were eligible, 97% completed the baseline and 90% completed the endline. Qualitative feedback indicated specific improvements in adolescent well-being, caregiver distress and parenting, and family relationships. Data highlighted high participant engagement and adequate facilitator fidelity and competence. Outcome measures had good psychometric properties (most α &gt; 0.80) and sensitivity to change, with significant changes seen on most measures in the intervention but not control group. Findings indicate the acceptability and feasibility of intervention and study procedures. Subsequent full-scale evaluation is needed to determine effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.43","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Armed conflict and forced displacement can significantly strain nurturing family environments, which are essential for child well-being. Yet, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of family-systemic interventions in these contexts. We conducted a two-arm, single-masked, feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (fRCT) of a whole-family intervention with Syrian, Iraqi and Jordanian families in Jordan. We aimed to determine the feasibility of intervention and study procedures to inform a fully-powered RCT. Eligible families were randomised to receive the Nurturing Families intervention or enhanced usual care (1:1). Masked assessors measured outcomes at baseline and endline; primary outcome measures were caregiver psychological distress, family functioning, and parenting practices. Families and implementing staff participated in qualitative interviews at endline. Of the 62 families screened, 60 (98%) were eligible, 97% completed the baseline and 90% completed the endline. Qualitative feedback indicated specific improvements in adolescent well-being, caregiver distress and parenting, and family relationships. Data highlighted high participant engagement and adequate facilitator fidelity and competence. Outcome measures had good psychometric properties (most α > 0.80) and sensitivity to change, with significant changes seen on most measures in the intervention but not control group. Findings indicate the acceptability and feasibility of intervention and study procedures. Subsequent full-scale evaluation is needed to determine effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培育家庭:针对约旦弱势家庭的全家庭干预可行性随机对照试验
武装冲突和被迫流离失所会严重影响对儿童福祉至关重要的家庭培育环境。然而,在这些情况下,有关家庭系统干预措施有效性的证据却很有限。我们在约旦的叙利亚、伊拉克和约旦家庭中开展了一项双臂、单掩蔽、可行性随机对照试验(fRCT)。我们的目标是确定干预措施和研究程序的可行性,以便为完全有效的随机对照试验提供依据。符合条件的家庭被随机分配接受 "培育家庭 "干预或加强型常规护理(1:1)。蒙面评估员在基线和终点测量结果;主要测量结果为照顾者的心理压力、家庭功能和养育方式。家庭和实施人员在终点参加了定性访谈。在筛选出的 62 个家庭中,有 60 个(98%)符合条件,97% 完成了基线调查,90% 完成了终点调查。定性反馈表明,青少年的幸福感、照顾者的苦恼和养育子女以及家庭关系都有了具体改善。数据显示,参与者的参与度很高,促进者的忠诚度和能力也很高。结果测量具有良好的心理测量特性(大多数 α > 0.80)和对变化的敏感性,干预组的大多数测量结果都有显著变化,而对照组则没有。研究结果表明了干预和研究程序的可接受性和可行性。需要进行后续的全面评估,以确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
Father’s involvement associated with rural children’s depression and anxiety: A large-scale analysis based on data from seven provinces in China Digital mental health interventions for treating mental disorders in young people based in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature Erratum: Scaling up the task-sharing of psychological therapies: A formative study of the PEERS smartphone application for supervision and quality assurance in rural India - CORRIGENDUM. “I was also trying to protect myself and save my life,” experiences of people living with severe mental illness and their caregivers regarding COVID-19 response in Uganda Erratum: Improving psychosocial well-being and parenting practices among refugees in Uganda: Results of the journey of life effectiveness trial - CORRIGENDUM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1