Tolerability of electrodiagnostic studies in patients: a prospective study

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000706
Chin-Hen Chang, Timithy Mark McClellan, Kevin David Lopez, Thomas Wasser, Somkiat Hemtasilpa
{"title":"Tolerability of electrodiagnostic studies in patients: a prospective study","authors":"Chin-Hen Chang, Timithy Mark McClellan, Kevin David Lopez, Thomas Wasser, Somkiat Hemtasilpa","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Nerve conduction study (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) are electrodiagnostic studies that are highly tolerated by patients despite their nature of causing pain and discomfort. However, few studies have focused on the true tolerability of these procedures in patients. This study aimed to determine the true tolerance rate of NCS and EMG in patient populations and the factors that might be associated with them. Methods Participants scheduled for electrodiagnostic studies were prospectively recruited between March 2023 and September 2023. After completion of the study, the physicians completed a questionnaire on each patient’s tolerance of the studies. Results Of the 103 patients enrolled in the study, 98 were able to tolerate both tests, and 5 patients were intolerant to 1 or both tests. The overall tolerance rate of NCS and EMG was 95.1% (0.951, 95% CI 0.897 to 0.981). Age, sex, ethnicity, the type of NCS performed and the type of EMG performed were not associated with NCS or EMG intolerance. Conclusion Most patients tolerated the NCS and EMG; however, a small percentage of patients were intolerant. Clinicians should recognise the intolerance of certain patients when introducing and performing electrodiagnostic tests. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Nerve conduction study (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) are electrodiagnostic studies that are highly tolerated by patients despite their nature of causing pain and discomfort. However, few studies have focused on the true tolerability of these procedures in patients. This study aimed to determine the true tolerance rate of NCS and EMG in patient populations and the factors that might be associated with them. Methods Participants scheduled for electrodiagnostic studies were prospectively recruited between March 2023 and September 2023. After completion of the study, the physicians completed a questionnaire on each patient’s tolerance of the studies. Results Of the 103 patients enrolled in the study, 98 were able to tolerate both tests, and 5 patients were intolerant to 1 or both tests. The overall tolerance rate of NCS and EMG was 95.1% (0.951, 95% CI 0.897 to 0.981). Age, sex, ethnicity, the type of NCS performed and the type of EMG performed were not associated with NCS or EMG intolerance. Conclusion Most patients tolerated the NCS and EMG; however, a small percentage of patients were intolerant. Clinicians should recognise the intolerance of certain patients when introducing and performing electrodiagnostic tests. Data are available upon reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对电诊断研究的耐受性:一项前瞻性研究
导言 神经传导研究(NCS)和肌电图(EMG)是一种电诊断研究,尽管会引起疼痛和不适,但患者的耐受性很高。然而,很少有研究关注患者对这些检查的真正耐受性。本研究旨在确定 NCS 和 EMG 在患者群体中的真实耐受率以及可能与之相关的因素。方法 在 2023 年 3 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,前瞻性地招募了计划进行电诊断研究的参与者。研究结束后,医生填写了一份关于每位患者对研究耐受性的调查问卷。结果 在参加研究的 103 名患者中,98 名患者能够耐受两项检查,5 名患者不能耐受其中一项或两项检查。对 NCS 和 EMG 的总体耐受率为 95.1%(0.951,95% CI 0.897 至 0.981)。年龄、性别、种族、所进行的 NCS 类型和 EMG 类型与 NCS 或 EMG 不耐受无关。结论 大多数患者能耐受 NCS 和 EMG,但也有一小部分患者不能耐受。临床医生在引入和进行电诊断测试时应认识到某些患者的不耐受性。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing insomnia after stroke: a diagnostic validation of the Sleep Condition Indicator in self-reported stroke survivors. Major vascular events after first incident stroke: a population-based study. Minimising the rate of vascular complications in Deep Brain Stimulation surgery for the management of Parkinson's disease: a single-centre 600-patient case series. Development and internal validation of prehospital prediction models for identifying intracerebral haemorrhage in suspected stroke patients. Review of theories into the pathogenesis of normal pressure hydrocephalus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1