A Multiple Lines of Evidence Approach to Demonstrate Effectiveness of PFAS Remediation Technologies

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1111/gwmr.12657
Tom Wanzek, Elisabeth Hawley, John Merrill, Rula Deeb, David Sedlak, Jennifer Field, Chris Higgins
{"title":"A Multiple Lines of Evidence Approach to Demonstrate Effectiveness of PFAS Remediation Technologies","authors":"Tom Wanzek,&nbsp;Elisabeth Hawley,&nbsp;John Merrill,&nbsp;Rula Deeb,&nbsp;David Sedlak,&nbsp;Jennifer Field,&nbsp;Chris Higgins","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Significant investments have been made to develop treatment technologies, particularly destructive approaches, for a variety of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are present in groundwater, surface water, and other environmental media. A multiple lines of evidence approach were developed to assist regulators, funding agencies, and practitioners in evaluating PFAS treatment technology performance. This article describes each of three lines of evidence that a technology is effective: (1) decrease in target PFAS concentrations is observed; (2) PFAS treatment transformation products are identified and quantified; and (3) a treatment mechanism is proposed that is consistent with previous studies and supported by data. Other considerations are also described to inform conclusions about knowledge gaps and priorities for future testing. Collectively, these lines of evidence and other considerations help communicate the complexities of PFAS treatment, strengthen research plans, standardize technology evaluator reviews, and inform realistic expectations of PFAS treatment technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant investments have been made to develop treatment technologies, particularly destructive approaches, for a variety of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are present in groundwater, surface water, and other environmental media. A multiple lines of evidence approach were developed to assist regulators, funding agencies, and practitioners in evaluating PFAS treatment technology performance. This article describes each of three lines of evidence that a technology is effective: (1) decrease in target PFAS concentrations is observed; (2) PFAS treatment transformation products are identified and quantified; and (3) a treatment mechanism is proposed that is consistent with previous studies and supported by data. Other considerations are also described to inform conclusions about knowledge gaps and priorities for future testing. Collectively, these lines of evidence and other considerations help communicate the complexities of PFAS treatment, strengthen research plans, standardize technology evaluator reviews, and inform realistic expectations of PFAS treatment technologies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证明全氟辛烷磺酸修复技术有效性的多种证据方法
针对地下水、地表水和其他环境介质中存在的各种全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS),已经投入了大量资金来开发处理技术,特别是破坏性方法。为了帮助监管机构、资助机构和从业人员评估 PFAS 处理技术的性能,我们开发了一种多证据方法。本文介绍了证明某项技术有效的三个证据:(1)观察到目标 PFAS 浓度下降;(2)确定并量化了 PFAS 处理转化产物;以及(3)提出了与先前研究一致并有数据支持的处理机制。此外,还介绍了其他考虑因素,以便就知识差距和未来测试的优先事项得出结论。总之,这些证据和其他考虑因素有助于说明全氟辛烷磺酸处理的复杂性,加强研究计划,规范技术评估人员的审查,并告知人们对全氟辛烷磺酸处理技术的现实期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Issue Information - ISSN page Complementary Field and Laboratory Batch Studies to Quantify Generation Rates of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in a Contaminated Agricultural Topsoil with Unknown Precursors Featured Products Highlight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1