Determination of optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure using electrical impedance tomography in infants under general anesthesia: Comparison between supine and prone positions

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1111/pan.14914
Ji‐Hyun Lee, Pyoyoon Kang, Jung‐Bin Park, Sang‐Hwan Ji, Young‐Eun Jang, Eun‐Hee Kim, Jin‐Tae Kim, Hee‐Soo Kim
{"title":"Determination of optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure using electrical impedance tomography in infants under general anesthesia: Comparison between supine and prone positions","authors":"Ji‐Hyun Lee, Pyoyoon Kang, Jung‐Bin Park, Sang‐Hwan Ji, Young‐Eun Jang, Eun‐Hee Kim, Jin‐Tae Kim, Hee‐Soo Kim","doi":"10.1111/pan.14914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsThis study determined the optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure levels in infants in supine and prone positions under general anesthesia using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).MethodsThis prospective observational single‐centre study included infants scheduled for surgery in the prone position. An electrical impedance tomography sensor was applied after inducing general anesthesia. The optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the supine position was determined in a decremental trial based on EIT and compliance. Subsequently, the patient's position was changed to prone. Electrical impedance tomography parameters, including global inhomogeneity index, regional ventilation delay, opening pressure, the centre of ventilation, and pendelluft volume, were continuously obtained up to 1 h after prone positioning. The optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the prone position was similarly determined.ResultsData from 30 infants were analyzed. The mean value of electrical impedance tomography‐based optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the prone position was significantly higher than that in the supine position [10.9 (1.6) cmH<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O and 6.1 (0.9) cmH<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O, respectively (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001)]. Significant differences were observed between electrical impedance tomography‐ and compliance‐based optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure. Peak and mean airway, plateau, and driving pressures increased 1 h after prone positioning compared with those in the supine position. In addition, the centre of ventilation for balance in ventilation between the ventral and dorsal regions improved.ConclusionThe prone position required higher positive end‐expiratory pressure than the supine position in mechanically ventilated infants under general anesthesia. EIT is a promising tool to find the optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure, which needs to be individualized.","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsThis study determined the optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure levels in infants in supine and prone positions under general anesthesia using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).MethodsThis prospective observational single‐centre study included infants scheduled for surgery in the prone position. An electrical impedance tomography sensor was applied after inducing general anesthesia. The optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the supine position was determined in a decremental trial based on EIT and compliance. Subsequently, the patient's position was changed to prone. Electrical impedance tomography parameters, including global inhomogeneity index, regional ventilation delay, opening pressure, the centre of ventilation, and pendelluft volume, were continuously obtained up to 1 h after prone positioning. The optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the prone position was similarly determined.ResultsData from 30 infants were analyzed. The mean value of electrical impedance tomography‐based optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure in the prone position was significantly higher than that in the supine position [10.9 (1.6) cmH2O and 6.1 (0.9) cmH2O, respectively (p < .001)]. Significant differences were observed between electrical impedance tomography‐ and compliance‐based optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure. Peak and mean airway, plateau, and driving pressures increased 1 h after prone positioning compared with those in the supine position. In addition, the centre of ventilation for balance in ventilation between the ventral and dorsal regions improved.ConclusionThe prone position required higher positive end‐expiratory pressure than the supine position in mechanically ventilated infants under general anesthesia. EIT is a promising tool to find the optimal positive end‐expiratory pressure, which needs to be individualized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电阻抗断层扫描确定全身麻醉下婴儿的最佳呼气末正压:仰卧位与俯卧位的比较
目的 本研究使用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)确定了全身麻醉下仰卧位和俯卧位婴儿的最佳呼气末正压水平。方法 这项前瞻性观察性单中心研究纳入了计划采用俯卧位进行手术的婴儿。诱导全身麻醉后使用电阻抗断层扫描传感器。根据 EIT 和顺应性,通过递减试验确定了仰卧位的最佳呼气末正压。随后,患者体位改为俯卧位。俯卧位后 1 小时内连续获得电阻抗断层成像参数,包括全局不均匀性指数、区域通气延迟、开放压力、通气中心和垂体容积。结果 分析了 30 名婴儿的数据。基于电阻抗断层扫描的俯卧位最佳呼气末正压的平均值明显高于仰卧位[分别为 10.9 (1.6) cmH2O 和 6.1 (0.9) cmH2O (p <.001)]。基于电阻抗断层扫描和顺应性的最佳呼气末正压之间存在显著差异。与仰卧位相比,俯卧位 1 小时后的峰值和平均气道压、高原压和驱动压均有所增加。结论对于全身麻醉下机械通气的婴儿,俯卧位比仰卧位需要更高的呼气末正压。EIT 是寻找最佳呼气末正压的一种有前途的工具,但需要因人而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The power of POCUS in every pocket: Handheld ultrasound the new essential tool? Severe knotting guidewire after central venous catheterization. Ball valve gas trapping in pediatric one-lung ventilation: Not all ventilation is loss of isolation. Links between mutations in functionally separate arms of mitochondrial complex I and responses to volatile anesthetics. Feasibility of bispectral index monitoring during pediatric critical care transport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1