Critical race theory and COVID-19 vaccination: An experimental test of interest convergence

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1111/josi.12611
Sophie Trawalter, James N. Druckman, Kyshia Henderson
{"title":"Critical race theory and COVID-19 vaccination: An experimental test of interest convergence","authors":"Sophie Trawalter,&nbsp;James N. Druckman,&nbsp;Kyshia Henderson","doi":"10.1111/josi.12611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Critical Race Theory (CRT) offers crucial insights into the persistence of racism. The theory also identifies the conditions under which White Americans will support policies aimed at redressing racial inequities. According to the tenet of interest convergence, White Americans will support policies aimed at redressing racial inequities when it serves their interests to do so; that is, when their interests converge with those of Black people. Here, we provide an experimental test of interest convergence in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with interest convergence, we find that White support for race-conscious policies aimed at redressing COVID-19 inequities increased when policies were framed as benefiting White people (i.e., a benefits frame). White support decreased when policies were framed as only benefiting Black people and was unmoved by a frame that accentuated systemic racism. Further, the impact of the benefit frame was not moderated by racial attitudes or political ideology. The results offer a sobering reminder that racial progress does not necessarily reflect shifts in White people's prejudice and consciousness, but rather shifts in their interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"80 2","pages":"778-800"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12611","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical Race Theory (CRT) offers crucial insights into the persistence of racism. The theory also identifies the conditions under which White Americans will support policies aimed at redressing racial inequities. According to the tenet of interest convergence, White Americans will support policies aimed at redressing racial inequities when it serves their interests to do so; that is, when their interests converge with those of Black people. Here, we provide an experimental test of interest convergence in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with interest convergence, we find that White support for race-conscious policies aimed at redressing COVID-19 inequities increased when policies were framed as benefiting White people (i.e., a benefits frame). White support decreased when policies were framed as only benefiting Black people and was unmoved by a frame that accentuated systemic racism. Further, the impact of the benefit frame was not moderated by racial attitudes or political ideology. The results offer a sobering reminder that racial progress does not necessarily reflect shifts in White people's prejudice and consciousness, but rather shifts in their interests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族批判理论与 COVID-19 疫苗接种:兴趣趋同实验测试
批判种族理论(CRT)为种族主义的持续存在提供了重要的见解。该理论还指出了美国白人支持旨在纠正种族不平等的政策的条件。根据利益趋同原则,当旨在纠正种族不平等的政策符合美国白人的利益时,他们就会支持这些政策;也就是说,当他们的利益与黑人的利益趋同时,他们就会支持这些政策。在此,我们以 COVID-19 大流行为背景,对利益趋同性进行了实验检验。与利益趋同一致的是,我们发现当旨在纠正 COVID-19 不公平现象的具有种族意识的政策被设定为有利于白人时(即利益框架),白人对这些政策的支持率会上升。当政策只有利于黑人时,白人的支持率就会下降,而强调系统性种族主义的框架则无动于衷。此外,利益框架的影响不受种族态度或政治意识形态的调节。这些结果警示我们,种族进步并不一定反映了白人偏见和意识的转变,而是反映了他们利益的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Challenging the Status-Quo with Practical Theory: Introduction to John T. Jost's Kurt Lewin Award Address From oppressive to affirmative: Situating the health and well-being of LGBTIQ+ people as impacted by systemic and structural transitions in Russia, Turkey, Pakistan, and India Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries The damaging legacy of damage-centered LGBTIQ+ research: Implications for healthcare and LGBTIQ+ health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1