Exercise referral schemes in the UK: mapping provision and aims

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdae057
Ben Jane, John Downey
{"title":"Exercise referral schemes in the UK: mapping provision and aims","authors":"Ben Jane, John Downey","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Exercise Referral Schemes (ERS) are designed so health professionals can refer certain patients to a supervised programme of physical activity. However, evaluations have questioned the effectiveness of these schemes/programmes. The aim of this study was to systematically review the provision of ERS in England and analyse related promotional material. Methods Content analysis methods were used to analyse scheme websites and promotional material. A coding scheme was used to analyse the data, which included information on the programme’s aims, inclusion criteria, type of activities, accessibility and cost. Results The study identified 625 sites offering ERS across 168 geographic areas. Findings highlighted a lack of clarity in what constitutes a scheme. Over a third of schemes did not explicitly state their aims, but of those that did, the focus was mainly on notions of physical and mental health benefits. Conclusions This study is the first to review the scope and offer of ERS in the UK by examining promotional material and highlights issues around the stated aims of ERS. More clarity on aims is needed in the material that promotes the schemes and most likely within the schemes themselves. Such improvements could make a difference when considering engagement with delivery stakeholders and potential participants.","PeriodicalId":16904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Exercise Referral Schemes (ERS) are designed so health professionals can refer certain patients to a supervised programme of physical activity. However, evaluations have questioned the effectiveness of these schemes/programmes. The aim of this study was to systematically review the provision of ERS in England and analyse related promotional material. Methods Content analysis methods were used to analyse scheme websites and promotional material. A coding scheme was used to analyse the data, which included information on the programme’s aims, inclusion criteria, type of activities, accessibility and cost. Results The study identified 625 sites offering ERS across 168 geographic areas. Findings highlighted a lack of clarity in what constitutes a scheme. Over a third of schemes did not explicitly state their aims, but of those that did, the focus was mainly on notions of physical and mental health benefits. Conclusions This study is the first to review the scope and offer of ERS in the UK by examining promotional material and highlights issues around the stated aims of ERS. More clarity on aims is needed in the material that promotes the schemes and most likely within the schemes themselves. Such improvements could make a difference when considering engagement with delivery stakeholders and potential participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国的运动转介计划:计划的提供和目标
背景 运动转介计划(ERS)的目的是让医疗专业人员将某些病人转介到有监督的体育活动计划中。然而,评估结果对这些计划/方案的有效性提出了质疑。本研究的目的是系统回顾英格兰提供的 ERS,并分析相关的宣传材料。方法 采用内容分析法对计划网站和宣传材料进行分析。采用编码方案对数据进行分析,其中包括计划的目的、纳入标准、活动类型、可及性和费用等信息。结果 这项研究确定了 168 个地区的 625 个提供 ERS 的地点。研究结果表明,计划的构成要素不够明确。超过三分之一的计划没有明确说明其目的,但在说明目的的计划中,重点主要放在对身心健康有益的概念上。结论 本研究首次通过审查宣传材料对英国雇员再保险计划的范围和提供的服务进行了审查,并强调了与雇员再保险计划的既定目标有关的问题。需要在宣传材料中更明确地说明这些计划的目的,而且很可能在计划本身中也需要这样做。在考虑与交付利益相关者和潜在参与者的接触时,这些改进可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health
Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
期刊最新文献
How does health visiting in the first year of life vary by family characteristics? A longitudinal analysis of administrative data The correlates of environmental initiatives in sports organizations with climate change attitudes and subjective well-being Enhancing vitamin D levels in care homes: the role of healthy building design in preventing respiratory infections ‘Sleeping with the enemy’: a cross-sectional study on psychological and emotional violence among couples living in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic Association between neonatal mortality and births not weighed among 400 thousand institutional deliveries in 32 low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1