Market Entry and Competition Under Network Effects

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Operations Research Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1287/opre.2022.0275
Yinbo Feng, Ming Hu
{"title":"Market Entry and Competition Under Network Effects","authors":"Yinbo Feng, Ming Hu","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We consider a three-stage game in which, first, a large number of potential firms make entry decisions, then those who choose to stay in the market decide on the investment (quality) level in each product, and last, customers with heterogeneous preferences arrive sequentially to make (random) purchase decisions based on product quality and historical sales under the network effect according to a discrete choice model. We characterize such a random purchase process and show that a growing network effect always contributes to more sales concentration ex post on a small number of products. Perhaps surprisingly, we further show several phase-changing phenomena regarding equilibrium outcomes with respect to the network effect’s strength. In particular, the equilibrium product variety (respectively, quality investment) first decreases (respectively, increases) and then increases (respectively, decreases) as the network effect grows. Specifically, when the strength of the network effect is below a threshold, an increasing network effect would shift more sales toward those products with higher quality, preventing more products from entering the market ex ante and inducing firms to adopt the high-budget equilibrium strategy by making a small number of high-quality products, which is consistent with the blockbuster phenomenon. When the strength of the network effect is above the threshold, the network effect would easily cause the market to be concentrated on a few products ex post; even some low-quality products may have a chance to become a “hit.” Interestingly, in this case, when the network effect is growing, the ex ante equilibrium product variety will be wider, and firms adopt the low-budget equilibrium strategy by making a (relatively) large number of low-quality products, a finding consistent with the long tail theory. We then establish the robustness of the previous main insights by accounting for endogenized pricing and multiproducts carried by each firm.</p><p><b>Funding:</b> Y. Feng was financially supported by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72192830 and 7219283X], Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Program for Innovative Research of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. M. Hu was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Grants RGPIN-2015-06757 and RGPIN-2021-04295].</p><p><b>Supplemental Material:</b> The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0275.</p>","PeriodicalId":54680,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a three-stage game in which, first, a large number of potential firms make entry decisions, then those who choose to stay in the market decide on the investment (quality) level in each product, and last, customers with heterogeneous preferences arrive sequentially to make (random) purchase decisions based on product quality and historical sales under the network effect according to a discrete choice model. We characterize such a random purchase process and show that a growing network effect always contributes to more sales concentration ex post on a small number of products. Perhaps surprisingly, we further show several phase-changing phenomena regarding equilibrium outcomes with respect to the network effect’s strength. In particular, the equilibrium product variety (respectively, quality investment) first decreases (respectively, increases) and then increases (respectively, decreases) as the network effect grows. Specifically, when the strength of the network effect is below a threshold, an increasing network effect would shift more sales toward those products with higher quality, preventing more products from entering the market ex ante and inducing firms to adopt the high-budget equilibrium strategy by making a small number of high-quality products, which is consistent with the blockbuster phenomenon. When the strength of the network effect is above the threshold, the network effect would easily cause the market to be concentrated on a few products ex post; even some low-quality products may have a chance to become a “hit.” Interestingly, in this case, when the network effect is growing, the ex ante equilibrium product variety will be wider, and firms adopt the low-budget equilibrium strategy by making a (relatively) large number of low-quality products, a finding consistent with the long tail theory. We then establish the robustness of the previous main insights by accounting for endogenized pricing and multiproducts carried by each firm.

Funding: Y. Feng was financially supported by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72192830 and 7219283X], Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Program for Innovative Research of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. M. Hu was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Grants RGPIN-2015-06757 and RGPIN-2021-04295].

Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0275.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络效应下的市场进入与竞争
我们考虑了这样一个三阶段博弈:首先,大量潜在企业做出进入市场的决定,然后,选择留在市场上的企业决定每种产品的投资(质量)水平,最后,具有异质性偏好的客户根据离散选择模型,根据产品质量和网络效应下的历史销售情况,依次做出(随机)购买决定。我们描述了这种随机购买过程的特征,并表明不断增长的网络效应总是会在事后促使更多的销售集中在少数产品上。或许令人惊讶的是,我们还进一步展示了与网络效应强度有关的均衡结果的若干阶段性变化现象。特别是,随着网络效应的增长,均衡产品种类(分别是质量投资)先减少(分别是增加),然后增加(分别是减少)。具体来说,当网络效应的强度低于临界值时,网络效应的增强会使更多的销售转向质量更高的产品,从而阻止更多的产品事先进入市场,促使企业采取高预算均衡策略,生产少量高质量的产品,这与大片现象是一致的。当网络效应的强度高于临界值时,网络效应很容易导致事后市场向少数产品集中,甚至一些低质量产品也有机会成为 "爆款"。有趣的是,在这种情况下,当网络效应不断增强时,事前均衡产品种类会更多,企业会采取低预算均衡策略,生产(相对)大量低质量产品,这一结论与长尾理论一致。然后,我们通过考虑内生定价和每个企业的多产品情况,确定了前面主要观点的稳健性:冯宇得到了国家自然科学基金重大项目[72192830 和 7219283X]、中央高校基本科研业务费和上海财经大学创新研究计划的资助。M.Hu得到了加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会[Grants RGPIN-2015-06757 and RGPIN-2021-04295]的资助:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0275。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research
Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
237
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: Operations Research publishes quality operations research and management science works of interest to the OR practitioner and researcher in three substantive categories: methods, data-based operational science, and the practice of OR. The journal seeks papers reporting underlying data-based principles of operational science, observations and modeling of operating systems, contributions to the methods and models of OR, case histories of applications, review articles, and discussions of the administrative environment, history, policy, practice, future, and arenas of application of operations research.
期刊最新文献
Stability of a Queue Fed by Scheduled Traffic at Critical Loading On (Random-Order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs Efficient Algorithms for a Class of Stochastic Hidden Convex Optimization and Its Applications in Network Revenue Management Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting Data-Driven Clustering and Feature-Based Retail Electricity Pricing with Smart Meters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1