Assessment of potentially inappropriate medications among long-stay older adult patients with serious mental illnesses: findings from a low-resource setting

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Middle East Current Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1186/s43045-024-00419-4
Ghinwa Abilmona, Feten Fekih-Romdhane, Souheil Hallit
{"title":"Assessment of potentially inappropriate medications among long-stay older adult patients with serious mental illnesses: findings from a low-resource setting","authors":"Ghinwa Abilmona, Feten Fekih-Romdhane, Souheil Hallit","doi":"10.1186/s43045-024-00419-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are defined as drugs whose adverse effects outweigh the benefits or when more efficacious alternatives are present. This study aims to assess the overall prevalence of PIMs according to Beers 2019 and 2023 among older adult patients with serious mental illnesses (such as schizophrenia), and factors associated with PIMs while examining the difference between the two versions. This cross-sectional study included chronic patients aged 65 years and above, hospitalized at the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross (Lebanon), and taking at least one medication daily. Sociodemographic characteristics, medications, and clinical information were obtained from patients’ medical records. SPSS version 26 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe independent variables, while bivariate analysis was used to assess associations between PIM use and different factors. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ninety-seven patients were included with a mean age of 71.21 (± 4.63) years. 52.6% were female. 44.3% were on polypharmacy (5–9 medications). 97.9% had at least one PIM according to both versions with the majority being anticholinergics (84.5%). Polypharmacy was significantly correlated to PIM use. Hospital stay length and the presence of comorbid neurological disorders were negatively associated with PIM use. PIMs were extremely prevalent among hospitalized psychiatric older adult patients. Raising awareness among physicians on the Beers criteria or making them mandatory could help diminish PIM use among this vulnerable population.","PeriodicalId":38653,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-024-00419-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are defined as drugs whose adverse effects outweigh the benefits or when more efficacious alternatives are present. This study aims to assess the overall prevalence of PIMs according to Beers 2019 and 2023 among older adult patients with serious mental illnesses (such as schizophrenia), and factors associated with PIMs while examining the difference between the two versions. This cross-sectional study included chronic patients aged 65 years and above, hospitalized at the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross (Lebanon), and taking at least one medication daily. Sociodemographic characteristics, medications, and clinical information were obtained from patients’ medical records. SPSS version 26 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe independent variables, while bivariate analysis was used to assess associations between PIM use and different factors. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ninety-seven patients were included with a mean age of 71.21 (± 4.63) years. 52.6% were female. 44.3% were on polypharmacy (5–9 medications). 97.9% had at least one PIM according to both versions with the majority being anticholinergics (84.5%). Polypharmacy was significantly correlated to PIM use. Hospital stay length and the presence of comorbid neurological disorders were negatively associated with PIM use. PIMs were extremely prevalent among hospitalized psychiatric older adult patients. Raising awareness among physicians on the Beers criteria or making them mandatory could help diminish PIM use among this vulnerable population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对长期住院的老年重症精神病患者潜在用药不当的评估:来自资源匮乏地区的研究结果
潜在不适当药物(PIMs)是指不良反应大于益处或存在更有效替代药物的药物。本研究旨在根据 Beers 2019 和 2023 版评估老年重性精神疾病(如精神分裂症)患者中潜在不适当用药的总体流行率,以及与潜在不适当用药相关的因素,同时研究两个版本之间的差异。这项横断面研究的对象包括 65 岁及以上、在十字架精神病医院(黎巴嫩)住院治疗、每天至少服用一种药物的慢性病患者。社会人口学特征、药物和临床信息均来自患者的医疗记录。数据分析采用 SPSS 26 版本。描述性统计用于描述自变量,而双变量分析则用于评估 PIM 使用与不同因素之间的关联。双尾 P 值小于 0.05 即为具有统计学意义。共纳入 97 名患者,平均年龄为 71.21 (± 4.63)岁。52.6%为女性。44.3%的患者服用多种药物(5-9种)。根据两个版本,97.9%的患者至少服用一种 PIM,其中大多数是抗胆碱能药物(84.5%)。多重用药与 PIM 的使用明显相关。住院时间和合并神经系统疾病与 PIM 的使用呈负相关。在住院的老年精神病患者中,PIM 的使用率极高。提高医生对 Beers 标准的认识或将其作为强制性标准,有助于减少这一弱势群体使用 PIM 的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Middle East Current Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality in telepsychiatry is a new horizon for immersive mental health therapy Status and sociodemographic correlates of pathological internet use among adolescents in Jordan: a cross-sectional study Post-traumatic stress disorder among nursing students at Palestine Polytechnique University during the Gaza war and the attack on the health care system Psychological assessment of violent behaviors in schizophrenic patients followed up in My EL Hassan health center of Kenitra, Morocco Burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression symptoms among workers in radiation field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1