The raced and gendered persistence of human‐exemptionalism

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13212
Miranda P. Dotson
{"title":"The raced and gendered persistence of human‐exemptionalism","authors":"Miranda P. Dotson","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper makes the case for a reconsideration of the human exemptionalist paradigm in sociological research. Reviewing recent research on the racialized and gendered dimensions of environmental use and abuse in North America, this paper argues that the persistent belief that humans dominate over all other biota is a direct result of the white supremacist, patriarchal gender system. Traditional Anglo‐European performances of and expectations for masculinity not only mandate the subjugation of women, but of all biota. Consequently, the burdens for repair and regeneration are disproportionately placed upon feminized subjects. This racialized gender system is strengthened as long as human exemptionalism persists. Ultimately, sociologists should contend with ‘human supremacy’ as a system of inequality that strengthens all other systems of inequality that plague human society. Moving forward, theories of liberation must go beyond the species boundary to account for an end to unjust domination of all life on Earth.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper makes the case for a reconsideration of the human exemptionalist paradigm in sociological research. Reviewing recent research on the racialized and gendered dimensions of environmental use and abuse in North America, this paper argues that the persistent belief that humans dominate over all other biota is a direct result of the white supremacist, patriarchal gender system. Traditional Anglo‐European performances of and expectations for masculinity not only mandate the subjugation of women, but of all biota. Consequently, the burdens for repair and regeneration are disproportionately placed upon feminized subjects. This racialized gender system is strengthened as long as human exemptionalism persists. Ultimately, sociologists should contend with ‘human supremacy’ as a system of inequality that strengthens all other systems of inequality that plague human society. Moving forward, theories of liberation must go beyond the species boundary to account for an end to unjust domination of all life on Earth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从种族和性别角度看人类豁免主义的顽固性
本文提出了在社会学研究中重新考虑人类豁免主义范式的理由。通过回顾最近对北美环境使用和滥用的种族化和性别化层面的研究,本文认为,人类统治所有其他生物区系的顽固信念是白人至上主义、父权制性别体系的直接结果。盎格鲁-欧洲人对男性的传统表现和期望不仅要求征服女性,而且要求征服所有生物群。因此,修复和再生的重担不成比例地落在了女性化的主体身上。只要人类豁免主义继续存在,这种种族化的性别体系就会得到加强。归根结底,社会学家应该与 "人类至上 "这一不平等体系作斗争,因为它强化了困扰人类社会的所有其他不平等体系。展望未来,解放理论必须超越物种的界限,为结束对地球上所有生命的不公正统治做出解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1