Improved adherence to statin treatment and differences in results between men and women after pictorial risk communication—a sub-study of the VIPVIZA RCT

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s00228-024-03694-6
Henrik Holmberg, Eva-Lotta Glader, Ulf Näslund, Bo Carlberg, Eva Sönnerstam, Margareta Norberg, Anders Själander
{"title":"Improved adherence to statin treatment and differences in results between men and women after pictorial risk communication—a sub-study of the VIPVIZA RCT","authors":"Henrik Holmberg, Eva-Lotta Glader, Ulf Näslund, Bo Carlberg, Eva Sönnerstam, Margareta Norberg, Anders Själander","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03694-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>People with intermediate CVD risk constitute most of the population. Within this group, the proportion of events is lower compared to the high-risk group, but they contribute with the largest absolute number of events. Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and progression can be slowed or even reversed with medication and lifestyle changes, but adherence to prescribed treatment is crucial.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aim</h3><p>To investigate the long-term effects of interventions with pictorial risk communication of cardiovascular (CVD) risk on average adherence in a group of statin users. Compare response in adherence over time between men and women after intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Participants on active statin treatment were followed up to 5 years after being randomly assigned to an intervention program aimed at raising CVD risk awareness among participants and their physicians. Merging prescribed medication databases with VIPVIZA study to study adherence over time. A moving average adherence was used to compare groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Generally, the average adherence to statins among the 512 participants was high. Men had a higher average adherence over time, while women had a sharper increase in adherence in conjuncture with the intervention program.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Both men and women were receptive to pictorial information regarding CVD risk, but the intervention effect was more pronounced in women. Sex differences are important when considering risk communication strategies. Periodically repeating the intervention was beneficial for maintaining the intervention effect over time.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>The VIPVIZA study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, May 8, 2013, number NCT01849575.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03694-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People with intermediate CVD risk constitute most of the population. Within this group, the proportion of events is lower compared to the high-risk group, but they contribute with the largest absolute number of events. Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and progression can be slowed or even reversed with medication and lifestyle changes, but adherence to prescribed treatment is crucial.

Aim

To investigate the long-term effects of interventions with pictorial risk communication of cardiovascular (CVD) risk on average adherence in a group of statin users. Compare response in adherence over time between men and women after intervention.

Methods

Participants on active statin treatment were followed up to 5 years after being randomly assigned to an intervention program aimed at raising CVD risk awareness among participants and their physicians. Merging prescribed medication databases with VIPVIZA study to study adherence over time. A moving average adherence was used to compare groups.

Results

Generally, the average adherence to statins among the 512 participants was high. Men had a higher average adherence over time, while women had a sharper increase in adherence in conjuncture with the intervention program.

Conclusions

Both men and women were receptive to pictorial information regarding CVD risk, but the intervention effect was more pronounced in women. Sex differences are important when considering risk communication strategies. Periodically repeating the intervention was beneficial for maintaining the intervention effect over time.

Trial registration

The VIPVIZA study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, May 8, 2013, number NCT01849575.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图形化风险交流后他汀类药物治疗依从性的改善及男女之间的结果差异--VIPVIZA RCT 的子研究
背景中度心血管疾病风险人群占总人口的大多数。与高危人群相比,中危人群发生心血管疾病的比例较低,但他们发生心血管疾病的绝对数量最多。动脉粥样硬化是一个动态过程,通过药物治疗和生活方式的改变可以减缓甚至逆转病情的发展,但坚持处方治疗至关重要。方法对正在接受他汀类药物治疗的参与者进行长达5年的随访,此前他们被随机分配到一个旨在提高参与者及其医生对心血管疾病风险认识的干预项目中。将处方药数据库与VIPVIZA研究合并,研究随时间变化的依从性。结果总体而言,512 名参与者对他汀类药物的平均依从性较高。结论男性和女性都能接受有关心血管疾病风险的图像信息,但干预效果在女性中更为明显。在考虑风险交流策略时,性别差异非常重要。定期重复干预有利于长期保持干预效果。试验注册VIPVIZA研究已于2013年5月8日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01849575。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Immune‑related serious adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors: systematic review and network meta‑analysis. Correction to: Use of antibiotics in the early COVID‑19 pandemic in Poland, the Netherlands and Spain, from erraticism to (more) logic. Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol on coagulation, vascular endothelial function and pregnancy outcome in early-onset severe preeclampsia. Is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma superior to lenvatinib? a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Risk of agranulocytosis with metamizole in comparison with alternative medications based on health records in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1