Three histories of the system of states

IF 1.4 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Politics Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1057/s41311-024-00566-9
Quentin Bruneau, Claire Vergerio
{"title":"Three histories of the system of states","authors":"Quentin Bruneau, Claire Vergerio","doi":"10.1057/s41311-024-00566-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An enduring question for social scientists concerns the origins of the system of states we currently live in. In this review paper, we aim to clarify the terms of the discussion by mapping out three different ways of periodizing its emergence. The first view is what we call the ‘millennial’ account of the system of states: it defines states and systems of states in the broadest fashion, identifying them as far back as the Bronze Age, if not earlier. The second and most famous position is the ‘early modern account’: it is grounded in the emergence of new actor categories like ‘state’ and ‘sovereignty,’ and points to major institutional developments pertaining to the fiscal-military apparatus. The third nascent position we present views the long nineteenth century as the birthplace of the system of states. Having mapped these accounts, we conclude by reflecting on their relation to one another.</p>","PeriodicalId":46593,"journal":{"name":"International Politics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00566-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An enduring question for social scientists concerns the origins of the system of states we currently live in. In this review paper, we aim to clarify the terms of the discussion by mapping out three different ways of periodizing its emergence. The first view is what we call the ‘millennial’ account of the system of states: it defines states and systems of states in the broadest fashion, identifying them as far back as the Bronze Age, if not earlier. The second and most famous position is the ‘early modern account’: it is grounded in the emergence of new actor categories like ‘state’ and ‘sovereignty,’ and points to major institutional developments pertaining to the fiscal-military apparatus. The third nascent position we present views the long nineteenth century as the birthplace of the system of states. Having mapped these accounts, we conclude by reflecting on their relation to one another.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家体系的三部历史
对于社会科学家来说,一个永恒的问题涉及我们目前所处的国家体系的起源。在这篇评论文章中,我们旨在通过勾勒三种不同的国家体系兴起时期划分方式,来澄清讨论的条件。第一种观点是我们所说的国家体系的 "千年 "论:它以最宽泛的方式定义国家和国家体系,认为它们可以追溯到青铜时代,甚至更早。第二种也是最著名的一种观点是 "早期现代观点":它以 "国家 "和 "主权 "等新的行为主体类别的出现为基础,并指出了与财政军事机构有关的重大制度发展。我们提出的第三种新观点认为,漫长的 19 世纪是国家体系的诞生地。在勾勒出这些观点之后,我们将对它们之间的关系进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: International Politics?is a leading peer reviewed journal dedicated to transnational issues and global problems. It subscribes to no political or methodological identity and welcomes any appropriate contributions designed to communicate findings and enhance dialogue.International Politics?defines itself as critical in character truly international in scope and totally engaged with the central issues facing the world today. Taking as its point of departure the simple but essential notion that no one approach has all the answers it aims to provide a global forum for a rapidly expanding community of scholars from across the range of academic disciplines.International Politics?aims to encourage debate controversy and reflection. Topics addressed within the journal include:Rethinking the Clash of CivilizationsMyths of WestphaliaHolocaust and ChinaLeo Strauss and the Cold WarJustin Rosenberg and Globalisation TheoryPutin and the WestThe USA Post-BushCan China Rise Peacefully Just WarsCuba Castro and AfterGramsci and IRIs America in Decline。
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing religion and religious ideology in political science research: what is in a name and what description can do Adam Watson and international relations: a contemporary reassessment—introduction Conspiratorial imaginaries of the right: a commentary on capital, race and space by Richard Saull From mandate to actor: the case of the International Law Commission EU–Russia energy cooperation: implications for Lithuania’s energy security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1