Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1177/0272989x241248142
Eeva-Liisa Røssell, Hilary Louise Bekker, Mara A. Schonberg, Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, Signe Borgquist, Henrik Støvring
{"title":"Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods","authors":"Eeva-Liisa Røssell, Hilary Louise Bekker, Mara A. Schonberg, Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, Signe Borgquist, Henrik Støvring","doi":"10.1177/0272989x241248142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAt mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y.MethodsWe invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women’s stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data.ResultsA total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%–98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind.ConclusionIn our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making.HighlightsAlmost all women of prescreening age (44–49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y. Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative. Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information.","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x241248142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAt mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y.MethodsWe invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women’s stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data.ResultsA total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%–98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind.ConclusionIn our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making.HighlightsAlmost all women of prescreening age (44–49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y. Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative. Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦妇女在收到邀请信息前决定是否参加乳腺癌筛查:采用实验方法的在线调查
导言:丹麦卫生局建议 50 至 69 岁的女性在收到乳房 X 射线照相筛查邀请后,在知情的情况下决定是否接受筛查。以往的研究表明,妇女对参加筛查持非常积极的态度。因此,我们假设丹麦女性在 50 岁收到筛查邀请之前可能已经决定参加乳腺癌筛查。方法我们随机抽样邀请了 2,952 名 44 至 49 岁(筛查前年龄)的丹麦女性,使用丹麦官方数字邮箱系统完成了一份关于筛查知情决策障碍的在线问卷。我们通过 3 个不同的问题询问了参与者的筛查意向,并对妇女进行了随机分组:1)将筛查作为一种机会;2)将筛查作为一种选择;3)将筛查作为一种机会,外加一个有关妇女决策阶段的问题。所有妇女都填写了有关背景特征、参加筛查计划的意向、筛查信息的使用和影响以及决策过程的偏好等问题。数据与社会人口登记数据相链接。其中,97%(95% 置信区间:96%-98%)的妇女表示,她们希望在 50 岁时应邀参加乳腺癌筛查。结论在我们的研究中,几乎所有筛查前年龄的女性都希望参加乳腺癌筛查,这表明在筛查邀请时提供信息可能为时已晚,无法为知情决策提供支持。亮点在我们的研究中,几乎所有预检年龄(44-49 岁)的女性都希望从 50 岁开始参加丹麦国家乳腺 X 线照相筛查项目。早期决策是做出知情决策的障碍,因为本研究中的女性在收到正式筛查邀请之前就有参加乳腺癌筛查的意向,因此,在收到筛查邀请时提供信息可能为时已晚,无法支持做出知情决策。只有极少数妇女拒绝参加筛查;然而,与只提供筛查选项而不描述替代方案的情况相比,当信息被描述为在接受或拒绝乳腺癌筛查(继续接受常规治疗)之间进行主动选择时,有更多的妇女拒绝筛查。在本研究中,三分之二阅读筛查信息的妇女在阅读所提供的信息后对筛查的态度没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Shared Decision Making Is in Need of Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Studies. Reframing SDM Using Implementation Science: SDM Is the Intervention. Incorporating Social Determinants of Health in Infectious Disease Models: A Systematic Review of Guidelines. Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study. The Use of Nudge Strategies in Improving Physicians' Prescribing Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1