Affect variability and cortisol in context: The moderating roles of mean affect and stress

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Psychoneuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107064
Brooke N. Jenkins , Logan T. Martin , Hee Youn “Helen” Lee , John F. Hunter , Amanda M. Acevedo , Sarah D. Pressman
{"title":"Affect variability and cortisol in context: The moderating roles of mean affect and stress","authors":"Brooke N. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Logan T. Martin ,&nbsp;Hee Youn “Helen” Lee ,&nbsp;John F. Hunter ,&nbsp;Amanda M. Acevedo ,&nbsp;Sarah D. Pressman","doi":"10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Positive and negative affect have been shown to have implications for hormones like cortisol but how moment to moment changes in affect (i.e., affect variability) influence cortisol secretion is less well understood. Additionally, context characteristics such as mean affect and stress may influence the association between affect variability and cortisol output. In the current study, we examined affect, stress, and cortisol data from 113 participants (age range = 25–63, <em>M</em> = 35.63, <em>SD</em> = 11.34; 29<!--> <!-->% male; 42<!--> <!-->% White/Caucasian, 37<!--> <!-->% Asian or Pacific Islander, 13<!--> <!-->% Hispanic/Latino, 4<!--> <!-->% Black/African American, 1<!--> <!-->% Native American, Eskimo, or Aleut, 4<!--> <!-->% selected “other” for their race/ethnicity). Participants completed ecological momentary assessments assessing positive and negative affect and stress four times per day for five days and provided saliva samples at each time point. Saliva was assayed for cortisol, and area under the curve with respect to ground was computed. In a three-way interaction, both positive affect mean level and stress moderated the association between positive affect variability and cortisol (<em>b</em> = −1.55, <em>t</em>(100) = −3.29, <em>SE</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> &lt;.01, <em>β</em> = −4.05). When breaking down this three-way interaction, in the context of low stress and high mean positive affect, variability was <em>positively</em> related to total cortisol output. In contrast, in the context of high stress and high mean positive affect, variability was <em>negatively</em> related to total cortisol output. While greater positive affect variability is generally worse for health-relevant outcomes (as prior research has shown and as we show here at low levels of stress), at high levels of stress, fluctuation in affect may be adaptive. For someone experiencing a high stress week, having fluctuations in positive affect may mean that they are adaptively changing to meet their environmental needs especially when they typically report high mean positive affect levels. There were no associations between negative affect variability and cortisol secretion nor did mean negative affect or stress play a moderating role for negative affect variability. This study provides evidence that positive affect variability’s association with cortisol secretion throughout the day may vary based on stress and mean positive affect levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20836,"journal":{"name":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024001082/pdfft?md5=6adf5d153d4171e2e12e7c672d27d912&pid=1-s2.0-S0306453024001082-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024001082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive and negative affect have been shown to have implications for hormones like cortisol but how moment to moment changes in affect (i.e., affect variability) influence cortisol secretion is less well understood. Additionally, context characteristics such as mean affect and stress may influence the association between affect variability and cortisol output. In the current study, we examined affect, stress, and cortisol data from 113 participants (age range = 25–63, M = 35.63, SD = 11.34; 29 % male; 42 % White/Caucasian, 37 % Asian or Pacific Islander, 13 % Hispanic/Latino, 4 % Black/African American, 1 % Native American, Eskimo, or Aleut, 4 % selected “other” for their race/ethnicity). Participants completed ecological momentary assessments assessing positive and negative affect and stress four times per day for five days and provided saliva samples at each time point. Saliva was assayed for cortisol, and area under the curve with respect to ground was computed. In a three-way interaction, both positive affect mean level and stress moderated the association between positive affect variability and cortisol (b = −1.55, t(100) = −3.29, SE = 0.47, p <.01, β = −4.05). When breaking down this three-way interaction, in the context of low stress and high mean positive affect, variability was positively related to total cortisol output. In contrast, in the context of high stress and high mean positive affect, variability was negatively related to total cortisol output. While greater positive affect variability is generally worse for health-relevant outcomes (as prior research has shown and as we show here at low levels of stress), at high levels of stress, fluctuation in affect may be adaptive. For someone experiencing a high stress week, having fluctuations in positive affect may mean that they are adaptively changing to meet their environmental needs especially when they typically report high mean positive affect levels. There were no associations between negative affect variability and cortisol secretion nor did mean negative affect or stress play a moderating role for negative affect variability. This study provides evidence that positive affect variability’s association with cortisol secretion throughout the day may vary based on stress and mean positive affect levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境中的情感变异和皮质醇:平均情感和压力的调节作用
积极和消极情绪已被证明对皮质醇等荷尔蒙有影响,但人们对情绪的瞬间变化(即情绪变异性)如何影响皮质醇分泌还不甚了解。此外,平均情绪和压力等情境特征可能会影响情绪变化与皮质醇分泌之间的关联。在本研究中,我们检查了 113 名参与者(年龄范围 = 25-63,M = 35.63,SD = 11.34;29 % 为男性;42 % 为白人/高加索人,37 % 为亚洲人或太平洋岛民,13 % 为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人,4 % 为黑人/非洲裔美国人,1 % 为美洲原住民、爱斯基摩人或阿留申人,4 % 的种族/族裔选择了 "其他")的情绪、压力和皮质醇数据。参与者在五天内每天完成四次生态瞬间评估,评估积极和消极情绪以及压力,并在每个时间点提供唾液样本。对唾液进行皮质醇检测,并计算与地面相关的曲线下面积。在三方交互作用中,积极情绪平均水平和压力都调节了积极情绪变异性与皮质醇之间的关联(b = -1.55, t(100) = -3.29, SE = 0.47, p <.01,β=-4.05)。如果细分这种三方交互作用,在低压力和高平均积极情绪的情况下,变异性与皮质醇总输出量呈正相关。相反,在高压力和高平均积极情绪的情况下,变异性与皮质醇总输出量呈负相关。虽然积极情绪变异性越大,通常对健康相关结果越不利(正如之前的研究以及我们在这里对低压力水平的研究所示),但在高压力水平下,情绪波动可能是适应性的。对于一周压力较大的人来说,积极情绪的波动可能意味着他们正在进行适应性改变,以满足环境需求,尤其是当他们通常报告的平均积极情绪水平较高时。消极情绪变异与皮质醇分泌之间没有关联,平均消极情绪或压力对消极情绪变异也没有调节作用。本研究提供的证据表明,积极情绪变异性与皮质醇分泌的全天关联可能会因压力和平均积极情绪水平的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Psychoneuroendocrinology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
268
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Psychoneuroendocrinology publishes papers dealing with the interrelated disciplines of psychology, neurobiology, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, and psychiatry, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary studies aiming at integrating these disciplines in terms of either basic research or clinical implications. One of the main goals is to understand how a variety of psychobiological factors interact in the expression of the stress response as it relates to the development and/or maintenance of neuropsychiatric illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Early-life adversity severity, timing, and context type are associated with SLC6A4 methylation in emerging adults: Results from a prospective cohort study Editorial Board Special issue editorial: Intersectionality and biological embedding Emotion and birth control: Emotion regulation ERPs differ based on menstrual cycle phase and hormonal contraceptive use Fasting insulinemia as biomarker of illness relapse in patients with severe mental illness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1