Examining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elementary Students’ Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Schools Implementing Tiered Systems

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/10634266241248446
Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman, Wendy Peia Oakes, Kandace Fleming, Nathan Allen Lane, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Rebecca Esther Swinburne Romine, Rebecca Sherod, Grant Edmund Allen
{"title":"Examining the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Elementary Students’ Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Schools Implementing Tiered Systems","authors":"Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman, Wendy Peia Oakes, Kandace Fleming, Nathan Allen Lane, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Rebecca Esther Swinburne Romine, Rebecca Sherod, Grant Edmund Allen","doi":"10.1177/10634266241248446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an urgent need to aid in what will be an ongoing educational recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. One avenue for supporting students with and at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) is implementation of tiered systems, which emphasize evidence-based practices to prevent and respond to academic, behavioral, and social and emotional well-being needs. We conducted this study to quantify cross-sectional differences between the academic years before (prepandemic: 2018–2019 and 2019–2020) and immediately following the pandemic onset (after-pandemic onset: 2021–2022) in students’ levels of internalizing and externalizing behaviors and referrals for special education eligibility determination. We analyzed data from the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE) and district-provided special education data from 22 elementary schools collected as part of regular practices. Schools were from two midwestern districts implementing an integrated tiered system of support—the Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-tiered (Ci3T) model of prevention—district-wide. Results indicated some statistically significant but very small-magnitude differences in internalizing and externalizing behaviors relative to the pandemic with few exceptions (e.g., fall externalizing scores slightly lower in fall after the pandemic onset). Effect sizes suggested students with disabilities and students of color were very similar and did not indicate differential pandemic impact. We discussed limitations, which centered primarily on issues of generalizability, and encouraged other researchers to examine shifts in student performance in other locales, in schools not yet implementing tiered systems, and in subsequent years following the pandemic onset.","PeriodicalId":47557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266241248446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an urgent need to aid in what will be an ongoing educational recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. One avenue for supporting students with and at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (e.g., internalizing and externalizing behaviors) is implementation of tiered systems, which emphasize evidence-based practices to prevent and respond to academic, behavioral, and social and emotional well-being needs. We conducted this study to quantify cross-sectional differences between the academic years before (prepandemic: 2018–2019 and 2019–2020) and immediately following the pandemic onset (after-pandemic onset: 2021–2022) in students’ levels of internalizing and externalizing behaviors and referrals for special education eligibility determination. We analyzed data from the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE) and district-provided special education data from 22 elementary schools collected as part of regular practices. Schools were from two midwestern districts implementing an integrated tiered system of support—the Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-tiered (Ci3T) model of prevention—district-wide. Results indicated some statistically significant but very small-magnitude differences in internalizing and externalizing behaviors relative to the pandemic with few exceptions (e.g., fall externalizing scores slightly lower in fall after the pandemic onset). Effect sizes suggested students with disabilities and students of color were very similar and did not indicate differential pandemic impact. We discussed limitations, which centered primarily on issues of generalizability, and encouraged other researchers to examine shifts in student performance in other locales, in schools not yet implementing tiered systems, and in subsequent years following the pandemic onset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 COVID-19 大流行对实施分层系统的学校中小学生内化和外化行为的影响
在 COVID-19 大流行之后,迫切需要帮助教育持续恢复。支持有情绪和行为障碍(如内化和外化行为)的学生和高危学生的一个途径是实施分层系统,该系统强调循证实践,以预防和应对学业、行为、社会和情绪健康需求。我们开展了这项研究,以量化大流行前(大流行前:2018-2019 学年和 2019-2020 学年)和大流行刚开始后(大流行后:2021-2022 学年)两个学年之间在学生内化和外化行为水平以及特殊教育资格确定转介方面的横截面差异。我们分析了学生内化和外化风险筛查量表(SRSS-IE)中的数据,以及由地区提供的特殊教育数据,这些数据来自 22 所小学,是常规教学活动的一部分。这些学校来自中西部的两个学区,在全学区范围内实施综合分层支持系统--全面、综合、三层(Ci3T)预防模式。结果表明,与大流行病相比,内化行为和外化行为在统计上有一些显著差异,但幅度很小,只有少数例外(例如,大流行病开始后的秋季外化行为得分略低)。影响大小表明残疾学生和有色人种学生的情况非常相似,并不表明大流行造成了不同的影响。我们讨论了研究的局限性,主要集中在可推广性问题上,并鼓励其他研究人员研究其他地区、尚未实施分层系统的学校以及大流行开始后的随后几年中学生成绩的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders publishes quality scholarship related to individuals with emotional and behavioral disorders. Articles represent a wide range of disciplines, including counseling, education, early childhood care, juvenile corrections, mental health, psychiatry, psychology, public health, rehabilitation, social work, and special education. Articles on characteristics, assessment, prevention, intervention, treatment, legal or policy issues, and evaluation are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Initial Development of the Child Responsiveness Scale for Early Childhood Settings Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Burnout: The Mediating Roles of Interpersonal Mindfulness in Teaching and Emotion Regulation Understanding the Relationship Between Race and Career Intent of Teachers Serving Students With Emotional and Behavior Disorders Taking Charge of Early Childhood Transitions: Preventing Challenging Behaviors Through Engaging Routines Research and Development of Short-Term Interventions for K–3 Students Having Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1