Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Software in the Automated Analysis of Left Ventricular Function in Echocardiography in Central Vietnam.

Q2 Medicine Acta Informatica Medica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/aim.2024.32.32-36
Chi Thang Doan, Khanh Hung Tran, Viet Thang Luong, Ngoc Hai Dang-Nguyen, Victoria Ton-Nu
{"title":"Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Software in the Automated Analysis of Left Ventricular Function in Echocardiography in Central Vietnam.","authors":"Chi Thang Doan, Khanh Hung Tran, Viet Thang Luong, Ngoc Hai Dang-Nguyen, Victoria Ton-Nu","doi":"10.5455/aim.2024.32.32-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a significant focus on the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare. However, current scientific evidence is still not convincing enough for the general public and the medical community to widely adopt AI in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted this study to investigate the correlation between left ventricular function indices assessed by AI and those evaluated by physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 136 patients who attended and received treatment at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from April 2022 to June 2023. Using QLAB version 15, Philips Healthcare.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI software accurately identified 98.5% of the echocardiographic cine-loops. However, there were about 1.5% of cine-loops that the software failed to recognize. The sensitivity of Ejection Fraction (EF) calculated by AI was 73.3%, specificity was 81.3%, and accuracy stood at 78.6%. A strong positive correlation was observed between EF measured by AI and that assessed by physicians, r = 0.701, p < 0.01. The sensitivity of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) calculated by AI was 42.1%, specificity was 84.8%, and accuracy was 67.6%. A moderate positive correlation was found between GLS measured by AI and physician's assessment, r = 0.460, p < 0.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of AI software for evaluating left ventricular function through ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain is rapid and yields results comparable to cardiologists' echocardiographic assessments. The AI-powered software holds a promising and feasible future in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":"32 1","pages":"32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2024.32.32-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been a significant focus on the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare. However, current scientific evidence is still not convincing enough for the general public and the medical community to widely adopt AI in clinical practice.

Objective: We conducted this study to investigate the correlation between left ventricular function indices assessed by AI and those evaluated by physicians.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 136 patients who attended and received treatment at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from April 2022 to June 2023. Using QLAB version 15, Philips Healthcare.

Results: The AI software accurately identified 98.5% of the echocardiographic cine-loops. However, there were about 1.5% of cine-loops that the software failed to recognize. The sensitivity of Ejection Fraction (EF) calculated by AI was 73.3%, specificity was 81.3%, and accuracy stood at 78.6%. A strong positive correlation was observed between EF measured by AI and that assessed by physicians, r = 0.701, p < 0.01. The sensitivity of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) calculated by AI was 42.1%, specificity was 84.8%, and accuracy was 67.6%. A moderate positive correlation was found between GLS measured by AI and physician's assessment, r = 0.460, p < 0.01.

Conclusion: The use of AI software for evaluating left ventricular function through ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain is rapid and yields results comparable to cardiologists' echocardiographic assessments. The AI-powered software holds a promising and feasible future in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能软件在越南中部地区超声心动图左心室功能自动分析中的功效。
背景:近年来,人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的应用发展备受关注。然而,目前的科学证据仍不足以说服公众和医学界在临床实践中广泛采用人工智能:本研究旨在探讨人工智能评估的左心室功能指数与医生评估的左心室功能指数之间的相关性:这项横断面描述性研究的对象是 2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 6 月在顺化医科大学附属医院就诊并接受治疗的 136 名患者。使用飞利浦医疗保健公司的 QLAB 15 版本:结果:人工智能软件准确识别了98.5%的超声心动图心动环。然而,约有 1.5% 的超声心动图瓣膜未能被软件识别。人工智能计算射血分数(EF)的敏感性为 73.3%,特异性为 81.3%,准确性为 78.6%。人工智能测量的射血分数与医生评估的射血分数之间存在很强的正相关性,r = 0.701,p < 0.01。用人工智能计算的全球纵向应变(GLS)的敏感性为 42.1%,特异性为 84.8%,准确性为 67.6%。人工智能测得的 GLS 与医生的评估结果呈中度正相关,r = 0.460,p < 0.01:结论:使用人工智能软件通过射血分数和整体纵向应变评估左心室功能非常快速,其结果可与心脏病专家的超声心动图评估相媲美。人工智能软件在临床实践中具有广阔的前景和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Carotid Stenosis and Pulsatile Index Measured by Transcranial Doppler. Combined Cataract and Corneal Transplantation Surgery Without Viscosurgical Devices. The Effect of Secreted IL-10 from Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Immune Checkpoint Molecules. Factors Affecting the Outcomes of COVID-19 in Diabetes Patients at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan, Indonesia. Electronic On-line Incident Reporting System (IRS) as a Tool for Risk Assessment in Radiation Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1