Effects of icosapent ethyl according to baseline residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results from REDUCE-IT.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae030
Pascal M Burger, Deepak L Bhatt, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Stefan Koudstaal, Arend Mosterd, Fabrice M A C Martens, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Frank L J Visseren
{"title":"Effects of icosapent ethyl according to baseline residual risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results from REDUCE-IT.","authors":"Pascal M Burger, Deepak L Bhatt, Jannick A N Dorresteijn, Stefan Koudstaal, Arend Mosterd, Fabrice M A C Martens, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Frank L J Visseren","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Icosapent ethyl lowers triglycerides and significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), though treatment effects may vary between individuals. This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute effects of icosapent ethyl on MACE according to baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Participants from the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) with ASCVD were included (n = 5785). The primary outcome was 3-point MACE, i.e. non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Baseline 5-year risk of MACE was estimated using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended SMART2 risk score. Modification of the relative treatment effects of icosapent ethyl by baseline risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, including a treatment-by-risk interaction. Next, treatment effects were assessed stratified by quartiles of baseline risk. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.2-5.3), MACE occurred in 361 vs. 489 patients in the icosapent ethyl vs. placebo group [95% confidence interval (CI)]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (0.63-0.82), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.4% (2.6-6.2%), number needed to treat (NNT) 23 (16-38), and 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence reduction (CIR) 5.7% (3.5-7.9%). Icosapent ethyl significantly reduced MACE in all risk quartiles, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.62 (0.43-0.88), 0.66 (0.48-0.92), 0.69 (0.53-0.90), and 0.78 (0.63-0.96), respectively (P for treatment-by-risk interaction = 0.106). The ARR (95% CI) increased across risk quartiles, i.e. was 3.9% (1.0-6.8%), 4.3% (1.2-7.3%), 5.1% (1.4-8.7%), and 5.6% (1.3-10.0%), respectively. This translates to NNTs (95% CI) of 26 (15-98), 24 (14-84), 20 (11-70), and 18 (10-77). The 5-year CIR (95% CI) was 4.8% (1.3-8.2%), 5.0% (1.3-8.7%), 6.1% (1.7-10.5%), and 7.7% (2.3-13.2%), respectively. Consistent results were obtained for 5-point MACE, additionally including coronary revascularization and unstable angina.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with ASCVD and elevated triglyceride levels, icosapent ethyl significantly reduces the risk of MACE irrespective of baseline CVD risk, though absolute benefits are largest for patients at the highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"488-499"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Icosapent ethyl lowers triglycerides and significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), though treatment effects may vary between individuals. This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute effects of icosapent ethyl on MACE according to baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods and results: Participants from the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) with ASCVD were included (n = 5785). The primary outcome was 3-point MACE, i.e. non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Baseline 5-year risk of MACE was estimated using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended SMART2 risk score. Modification of the relative treatment effects of icosapent ethyl by baseline risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, including a treatment-by-risk interaction. Next, treatment effects were assessed stratified by quartiles of baseline risk. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.2-5.3), MACE occurred in 361 vs. 489 patients in the icosapent ethyl vs. placebo group [95% confidence interval (CI)]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (0.63-0.82), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.4% (2.6-6.2%), number needed to treat (NNT) 23 (16-38), and 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence reduction (CIR) 5.7% (3.5-7.9%). Icosapent ethyl significantly reduced MACE in all risk quartiles, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.62 (0.43-0.88), 0.66 (0.48-0.92), 0.69 (0.53-0.90), and 0.78 (0.63-0.96), respectively (P for treatment-by-risk interaction = 0.106). The ARR (95% CI) increased across risk quartiles, i.e. was 3.9% (1.0-6.8%), 4.3% (1.2-7.3%), 5.1% (1.4-8.7%), and 5.6% (1.3-10.0%), respectively. This translates to NNTs (95% CI) of 26 (15-98), 24 (14-84), 20 (11-70), and 18 (10-77). The 5-year CIR (95% CI) was 4.8% (1.3-8.2%), 5.0% (1.3-8.7%), 6.1% (1.7-10.5%), and 7.7% (2.3-13.2%), respectively. Consistent results were obtained for 5-point MACE, additionally including coronary revascularization and unstable angina.

Conclusion: Among patients with ASCVD and elevated triglyceride levels, icosapent ethyl significantly reduces the risk of MACE irrespective of baseline CVD risk, though absolute benefits are largest for patients at the highest risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的基线残余风险确定冰沙平乙酯的效果:REDUCE-IT 的结果。
背景和目的:伊可新戊酯可降低甘油三酯并显著减少主要不良心血管事件(MACE),但治疗效果可能因人而异。本研究旨在根据动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者的基线心血管疾病风险,确定伊可新戊酯对 MACE 的相对和绝对影响:方法:纳入REDUCE-IT的ASCVD患者(n = 5,785)。主要结果为3点MACE,即非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性中风或心血管死亡。采用ESC指南推荐的SMART2风险评分估算基线5年MACE风险。使用包括治疗与风险交互作用的 Cox 比例危险模型评估了基线风险对 icosapent ethyl 相对治疗效果的影响。然后,根据基线风险的四分位数对治疗效果进行分层评估:在中位随访 4.8 年(四分位间范围 3.2-5.3)期间,伊可新乙酯组与安慰剂组分别有 361 例和 489 例患者发生 MACE(95% 置信区间 [CI]);危险比 (HR) 0.72 (0.63-0.82),绝对风险降低率 (ARR) 4.4% (2.6-6.2%),治疗所需人数 (NNT) 23 (16-38),5 年 Kaplan-Meier 估计累积发病率降低率 (CIR) 5.7% (3.5-7.9%)。在所有风险四分位数中,伊可新戊酯都能显著降低MACE,HR(95% CI)分别为0.62(0.43-0.88)、0.66(0.48-0.92)、0.69(0.53-0.90)和0.78(0.63-0.96)(治疗与风险的交互作用P=0.106)。ARR(95% CI)随风险四分位数的增加而增加,即分别为 3.9% (1.0-6.8%)、4.3% (1.2-7.3%)、5.1% (1.4-8.7%) 和 5.6% (1.3-10.0%)。这意味着NNTs(95% CI)分别为26(15-98)、24(14-84)、20(11-70)和18(10-77)。5 年 CIR(95% CI)分别为 4.8%(1.3-8.2%)、5.0%(1.3-8.7%)、6.1%(1.7-10.5%)和 7.7%(2.3-13.2%)。5点MACE结果一致,此外还包括冠状动脉血运重建和不稳定型心绞痛:结论:在患有 ASCVD 和甘油三酯水平升高的患者中,无论基线 CVD 风险如何,icosapent ethyl 均可显著降低 MACE 风险,但高风险患者的绝对获益最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
期刊最新文献
Lipid lowering therapies for aortic stenosis: a drug-target Mendelian randomisation study. STOPDAPT-3 subanalysis on prasugrel monotherapy after elective or emergent coronary intervention in patients with or without diabetes: are we ready for this? Pharmacogenetic testing to broaden patient eligibility for mavacamten. Cost-effectiveness of Implementing a Genotype-Guided De-Escalation Strategy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Extensive LDL-cholesterol lowering by PCSK9 inhibitor on the risk of venous thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1