Evaluation of common femoral vein thickness as a diagnostic tool for Behçet's disease in a non-endemic area.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-03 DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/a56qqi
Sarah A C Neaime, Mariana F de Aguiar, Dennise O N Farias, Eliza Nakajima, Francisca H Moon, Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza
{"title":"Evaluation of common femoral vein thickness as a diagnostic tool for Behçet's disease in a non-endemic area.","authors":"Sarah A C Neaime, Mariana F de Aguiar, Dennise O N Farias, Eliza Nakajima, Francisca H Moon, Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/a56qqi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate common femoral vein thickness (CFVT) as a diagnostic tool in Brazilian patients with Behçet's disease (BD) and to analyse associations between increased CFVT and disease features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed including 100 BD patients and 100 controls. The CFVT and the diameters of great saphenous vein (GSV), and small saphenous vein (SSV) were measured by Doppler ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BD patients had higher right CFVT [0.600mm (0.500-0.700) vs. 0.525mm (0.450-0.637); p=0.012] and left CFVT [0.550mm (0.450-0.650) vs. 0.500mm (0.450-0.550); p=0.004] compared to controls. Vascular involvement of BD and previous deep venous thrombosis were associated with increased CFVT (p<0.05). The number of vascular events correlated with right and left CFVT (Rho = 0.475 p=0.030 and Rho = 0.429 p=0.052, respectively). The 0.575mm cut-off point of right and left CFVT had area under the curve (AUC) of 0.602; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.524-0.680 and AUC: 0.615; 95% CI: 0.537-0.693, respectively. The right and left CFVT had a sensitivity for BD diagnosis of 52% and 43%, and a specificity of 64% and 77%, respectively. No significant differences were found between BD patients and controls regarding the GSV and SSV diameters in both legs (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, CFVT measurement was not shown to be a reliable diagnostic test for BD. CFVT was increased in BD patients presenting vascular involvement and correlated with the number of previous events.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/a56qqi","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate common femoral vein thickness (CFVT) as a diagnostic tool in Brazilian patients with Behçet's disease (BD) and to analyse associations between increased CFVT and disease features.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 100 BD patients and 100 controls. The CFVT and the diameters of great saphenous vein (GSV), and small saphenous vein (SSV) were measured by Doppler ultrasound.

Results: BD patients had higher right CFVT [0.600mm (0.500-0.700) vs. 0.525mm (0.450-0.637); p=0.012] and left CFVT [0.550mm (0.450-0.650) vs. 0.500mm (0.450-0.550); p=0.004] compared to controls. Vascular involvement of BD and previous deep venous thrombosis were associated with increased CFVT (p<0.05). The number of vascular events correlated with right and left CFVT (Rho = 0.475 p=0.030 and Rho = 0.429 p=0.052, respectively). The 0.575mm cut-off point of right and left CFVT had area under the curve (AUC) of 0.602; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.524-0.680 and AUC: 0.615; 95% CI: 0.537-0.693, respectively. The right and left CFVT had a sensitivity for BD diagnosis of 52% and 43%, and a specificity of 64% and 77%, respectively. No significant differences were found between BD patients and controls regarding the GSV and SSV diameters in both legs (p>0.05).

Conclusions: In this study, CFVT measurement was not shown to be a reliable diagnostic test for BD. CFVT was increased in BD patients presenting vascular involvement and correlated with the number of previous events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非流行区评估股总静脉厚度作为诊断贝赫切特氏病的工具。
目的评估作为诊断工具的股总静脉厚度(CFVT)对巴西贝赫切特病(BD)患者的影响,并分析CFVT增加与疾病特征之间的关联:这项横断面研究包括 100 名贝赫切特病患者和 100 名对照者。多普勒超声测量了CFVT以及大隐静脉(GSV)和小隐静脉(SSV)的直径:结果:与对照组相比,BD 患者的右侧 CFVT [0.600mm (0.500-0.700) vs. 0.525mm (0.450-0.637); p=0.012]和左侧 CFVT [0.550mm (0.450-0.650) vs. 0.500mm (0.450-0.550); p=0.004]更高。BD血管受累和既往深静脉血栓形成与CFVT增加有关(P0.05):在这项研究中,CFVT 测量未被证明是一种可靠的 BD 诊断测试。在出现血管受累的 BD 患者中,CFVT 增加,并与既往事件的数量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
Group 3 innate lymphoid cells promotes Th17 cells differentiation in rheumatoid arthritis. Mechanism of neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathogenesis of gout. Osteoarticular x-ray reading by medical students followed by eye-tracking: better understanding for better training. Understanding mechanisms of JAK1 inhibition on synovial fibroblasts using combinatorial approaches of bulk and single cell RNAseq analyses. WNT16 as a promising biomarker for systemic lupus erythematosus and its role in regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1