Sources of Sound Exposure in Pediatric Critical Care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024688
Laura Beth Kalvas, Tondi M Harrison
{"title":"Sources of Sound Exposure in Pediatric Critical Care.","authors":"Laura Beth Kalvas, Tondi M Harrison","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sound levels in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are often above recommended levels, but few researchers have identified the sound sources contributing to high levels.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify sources of PICU sound exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of continuous bedside video and dosimeter data (n = 220.7 hours). A reliable coding scheme developed to identify sound sources in the adult ICU was modified for pediatrics. Proportions of sound sources were compared between times of high (≥45 dB) and low (<45 dB) sound, during day (7 AM to 6:59 PM) and night (7 PM to 6:59 AM) shifts, and during sound peaks (≥70 dB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, family vocalizations (38% of observation time, n = 83.9 hours), clinician vocalizations (32%, n = 70.6 hours), and child nonverbal vocalizations (29.4%, n = 64.9 hours) were the main human sound sources. Media sounds (57.7%, n = 127.3 hours), general activity (40.7%, n = 89.8 hours), and medical equipment (31.3%, n = 69.1 hours) were the main environmental sound sources. Media sounds occurred in more than half of video hours. Child nonverbal (71.6%, n = 10.2 hours) and family vocalizations (63.2%, n = 9 hours) were highly prevalent during sound peaks. General activity (32.1%, n = 33.2 hours), clinician vocalizations (22.5%, n = 23.3 hours), and medical equipment sounds (20.6, n = 21.3 hours) were prevalent during night shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians should partner with families to limit nighttime PICU noise pollution. Large-scale studies using this reliable coding scheme are needed to understand the PICU sound environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 3","pages":"202-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sound levels in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are often above recommended levels, but few researchers have identified the sound sources contributing to high levels.

Objectives: To identify sources of PICU sound exposure.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of continuous bedside video and dosimeter data (n = 220.7 hours). A reliable coding scheme developed to identify sound sources in the adult ICU was modified for pediatrics. Proportions of sound sources were compared between times of high (≥45 dB) and low (<45 dB) sound, during day (7 AM to 6:59 PM) and night (7 PM to 6:59 AM) shifts, and during sound peaks (≥70 dB).

Results: Overall, family vocalizations (38% of observation time, n = 83.9 hours), clinician vocalizations (32%, n = 70.6 hours), and child nonverbal vocalizations (29.4%, n = 64.9 hours) were the main human sound sources. Media sounds (57.7%, n = 127.3 hours), general activity (40.7%, n = 89.8 hours), and medical equipment (31.3%, n = 69.1 hours) were the main environmental sound sources. Media sounds occurred in more than half of video hours. Child nonverbal (71.6%, n = 10.2 hours) and family vocalizations (63.2%, n = 9 hours) were highly prevalent during sound peaks. General activity (32.1%, n = 33.2 hours), clinician vocalizations (22.5%, n = 23.3 hours), and medical equipment sounds (20.6, n = 21.3 hours) were prevalent during night shifts.

Conclusions: Clinicians should partner with families to limit nighttime PICU noise pollution. Large-scale studies using this reliable coding scheme are needed to understand the PICU sound environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护中的声音暴露源。
背景:儿科重症监护室(PICU)内的声级通常高于建议的声级,但很少有研究人员确定导致高声级的声源:方法:这是一项对连续床旁视频和数据进行的二次分析:这是对连续床旁视频和剂量计数据(n = 220.7 小时)的二次分析。对用于识别成人重症监护病房声源的可靠编码方案进行了修改,以适用于儿科。比较了高分贝(≥45 dB)和低分贝(结果:≥45 dB)时的声源比例:总体而言,人类的主要声源是家人的发声(占观察时间的 38%,n = 83.9 小时)、临床医生的发声(32%,n = 70.6 小时)和儿童的非语言发声(29.4%,n = 64.9 小时)。媒体声音(57.7%,n = 127.3 小时)、一般活动(40.7%,n = 89.8 小时)和医疗设备(31.3%,n = 69.1 小时)是主要的环境声源。半数以上的视频时间都有媒体声音。在声音高峰期,儿童的非语言(71.6%,n = 10.2 小时)和家人的发声(63.2%,n = 9 小时)非常普遍。一般活动(32.1%,n = 33.2 小时)、临床医生发声(22.5%,n = 23.3 小时)和医疗设备声音(20.6,n = 21.3 小时)在夜班期间很普遍:结论:临床医生应与家属合作,限制夜间 PICU 噪音污染。结论:临床医生应与家属合作,限制夜间 PICU 的噪声污染。需要使用这种可靠的编码方案进行大规模研究,以了解 PICU 的声音环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Correction. A 12-Lead Electrocardiography Patch for Continuous Arrhythmia Monitoring: A Case Example. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the McDermott Article. From Moral Distress to Moral Integrity: Qualitative Evaluation of a New Moral Conflict Assessment Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1