{"title":"Internet of things-based approach for glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Ryotaro Bouchi, Kazuo Izumi, Naoki Ishizuka, Yukari Uemura, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Kengo Miyo, Shigeho Tanaka, Noriko Satoh-Asahara, Kazuo Hara, Masato Odawara, Yoshiki Kusunoki, Hidenori Koyama, Takeshi Onoue, Hiroshi Arima, Kazuyo Tsushita, Hirotaka Watada, Takashi Kadowaki, Kohjiro Ueki","doi":"10.1111/jdi.14227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The utilization of long-term effect of internet of things (IoT) on glycemic control is controversial. This trial aimed to examine the effect of an IoT-based approach for type 2 diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,159 adults aged 20–74 years with type 2 diabetes with a HbA1c of 6.0–8.9% (42–74 mmol/mol), who were using a smartphone on a daily basis were randomly assigned to either the IoT-based approach group (ITG) or the control group (CTG). The ITG were supervised to utilize an IoT automated system that demonstrates a summary of lifelogging data (weight, blood pressure, and physical activities) and provides feedback messages that promote behavioral changes in both diet and exercise. The primary end point was a HbA1c change over 52 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the patients, 581 were assigned to the ITG and 578 were in the CTG. The changes in HbA1c from baseline to the final measurement at 52 weeks [mean (standard deviation)] were −0.000 (0.6225)% in ITG and − 0.006 (0.6449)% in CTG, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.8766). In the per protocol set, including ITG using the IoT system almost daily and CTG, excluding those using the application almost daily, the difference in HbA1c from baseline to 52 weeks were −0.098 (0.579)% and 0.027 (0.571)%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.0201). We observed no significant difference in the adverse event profile between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The IoT-based approach did not reduce HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. IoT-based intervention using data on the daily glycemic control and HbA1c level may be required to improve glycemic control.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.14227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
The utilization of long-term effect of internet of things (IoT) on glycemic control is controversial. This trial aimed to examine the effect of an IoT-based approach for type 2 diabetes.
Materials and Methods
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,159 adults aged 20–74 years with type 2 diabetes with a HbA1c of 6.0–8.9% (42–74 mmol/mol), who were using a smartphone on a daily basis were randomly assigned to either the IoT-based approach group (ITG) or the control group (CTG). The ITG were supervised to utilize an IoT automated system that demonstrates a summary of lifelogging data (weight, blood pressure, and physical activities) and provides feedback messages that promote behavioral changes in both diet and exercise. The primary end point was a HbA1c change over 52 weeks.
Results
Among the patients, 581 were assigned to the ITG and 578 were in the CTG. The changes in HbA1c from baseline to the final measurement at 52 weeks [mean (standard deviation)] were −0.000 (0.6225)% in ITG and − 0.006 (0.6449)% in CTG, respectively (P = 0.8766). In the per protocol set, including ITG using the IoT system almost daily and CTG, excluding those using the application almost daily, the difference in HbA1c from baseline to 52 weeks were −0.098 (0.579)% and 0.027 (0.571)%, respectively (P = 0.0201). We observed no significant difference in the adverse event profile between the groups.
Conclusions
The IoT-based approach did not reduce HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. IoT-based intervention using data on the daily glycemic control and HbA1c level may be required to improve glycemic control.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).